Tag Archives: challenges

WHAT ARE SOME COMMON CHALLENGES THAT STUDENTS FACE WHEN CREATING THEIR CAPSTONE PROJECT TIMELINES

Leave a reply

A major challenge students face is underestimating the total time needed to complete all aspects of the capstone project. Capstone projects often involve complex, multi-step processes that require extensive planning, research, execution of various tasks, analysis, and reporting. Students who are working on their capstone projects for the first time may find it difficult to accurately estimate how long each part of the process will take. They tend to assume tasks will take less time than is realistically needed. This can lead to an unrealistic timeline that does not properly account for potential setbacks or delays. To address this challenge, students should build extra buffer time into their initial timeline estimates. They can also consult with faculty advisors or peers who have completed capstones previously to get a better sense of realistic timeframes.

Another timeline-related challenge comes from failing to properly break down large projects into specific, actionable tasks. It is easy for students to list broad steps like “conduct research” or “analyze data” in their timelines without delineating the numerous sub-tasks that fall under each of those headings. This results in a timeline that is vague and difficult to use effectively for planning purposes. Students should spend time whiteboarding or mind-mapping all of the individual processes, decisions, and to-dos that fall under each major step. Only by breaking projects down into discrete, actionable tasks can students then estimate realistic deadlines and due dates to develop a useable timeline.

Related to the above challenge, students also commonly struggle with sequencing and ordering the necessary tasks and milestones in a logical workflow. Without a clear understanding of workflow dependencies, it is easy for timeline tasks and dates to be listed in an illogical or even contradictory order. Students must take care to think through how each individual task, whether research, data collection, analysis, or writing, informs or depends on subsequent tasks when putting together their timelines. Failure to consider workflow and dependencies can result in unrealistic assumptions about when certain tasks can be completed.

A further issue stems from external factors and life events that are difficult to foresee and plan for when students are first developing capstone timelines. Personal issues like health problems, family emergencies, or increased work responsibilities are common sources of unplanned delays. So too are challenges like difficulty connecting with potential interviewees or participants, problems securing needed resources or approvals, adverse weather/disaster events, or technologic difficulties. Students should incorporate buffer time and build in contingencies in their timelines to allow for minor setbacks from unforeseen circumstances that are an inevitable part of any long-term project work. They can also schedule regular meetings with advisors to re-evaluate progress against timeline goals and modify deadlines as needed.

Student motivation and consistency of effort over long periods is another factor often underestimated in early capstone timelines. As capstone work gets broken into smaller incremental tasks over months, it is easy for student momentum and focus to waver without structured accountability. Timelines need to be designed with intermediate progress reporting, submission of modular deliverables, and regular checkpoint meetings built in to keep students on track motivationally as well as temporally. Without breaks in long-term projects and consistent oversight, timeline goals may not be met due to lapses in effort or follow through. Proactively planning periods for review of accomplishments and adjustment of next steps can help address issues of flagging motivation.

Ensuring adequate timeliness reviews of drafts is also key. Students may underestimate how long different rounds of feedback, revision and refinement of deliverables may take based on faculty and committee availability. Multiple draft iterations of proposals, methodology documentation, initial findings and final reporting are standard parts of the capstone process but the related timing is difficult for students to estimate accurately without prior project experience. Timelines need to realistically account not just for the initial development of deliverables but multiple review-feedback-revision cycles as well. Proper deadline setting here requires communication with advisors about their review cycles and availability for feedback.

Students face numerous realistic challenges in creating accurate and usable timelines for their lengthy capstone projects given the complex nature of the work and their own inexperience in executing such long-term independent research or analysis. Careful planning, frequent re-evaluation, incorporation of schedule buffer time, consideration of life factors and draft review cycles, structured interim deliverables and regular advising checkpoints can help students to develop strong yet flexible capstone timelines that set them up for success in completing their final academic assignments. With guidance from faculty and peers, students can learn to anticipate and address many timeline issues early to stay on track.

HOW CAN TECHNOLOGY HELP ADDRESS THE CHALLENGES OF AFFORDABILITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE IN IMPLEMENTING SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE PRACTICES

Leave a reply

Technology can play a major role in addressing the challenges of affordability and lack of infrastructure that often hinder the widespread adoption of sustainable agriculture practices, especially among smallholder farmers in developing nations. Here are some key ways this can be done:

Precision agriculture technologies such as GPS guidance systems, soil sensors, and drones equipped with cameras and sensors can help farmers use inputs like water, fertilizer, and pesticides much more efficiently. This precision allows for optimized usage while avoiding over-application, which brings considerable cost savings. Precision tools also enable site-specific management of fields, taking into account variability in soil health, which boosts yields. All of this can be done with minimal infrastructure requirements beyond the technologies themselves. For example, drone images and sensors can map a field and indicate exactly where and how much water or fertilizer is needed without the need for expensive irrigation systems or soil testing labs.

Mobile apps and digital platforms can also play a huge role in disseminating sustainable farming knowledge and techniques to widespread populations with minimal infrastructure. For example, apps provide just-in-time information to farmers on crop choices, planting times, nutrient management practices optimized for their location, weather forecasts, pest and disease warnings, and market prices via their smartphones. They may also connect farmers to agricultural experts for advice and help address specific problems. Some platforms even facilitate financial transactions by linking farmers to credit providers, input and machinery suppliers, and buyers. This type of access to knowledge, markets and financing helps remove barriers to adoption of sustainable practices.

Low-cost automated devices driven by artificial intelligence (AI) and Internet of Things (IoT) technologies also have potential to overcome infrastructure and affordability hurdles. For instance, inexpensive smart greenhouses powered by renewable energy can precisely control temperature, humidity, carbon dioxide levels, nutrient delivery and other parameters to maximize yields from smaller spaces with fewer inputs. AI and IoT can automate water and fertilizer delivery in hydroponic and aeroponic vertical farming systems with minimal land or water requirements. Similarly, autonomous robotic tools driven by computer vision can streamline operations like weeding and crop monitoring. While high-end versions of such technologies may be expensive initially, open-source community innovation is driving the development and sharing of simpler, low-cost sustainable farming devices.

Blockchain and distributed ledgers have applications for sustainably improving transparency, access and affordability in agriculture value chains. For example, they enable smallholder farmers to connect directly with buyers, cut out middlemen, and receive fair prices for sustainable products. Smart contracts on blockchain verify and automate transactions so farmers get paid immediately on delivery. Traceability solutions based on blockchain lend authenticity to sustainably-grown labels, opening new higher-value niche export markets. The same technologies can power innovative sharing economies for agricultural assets like machinery, reducing individual capital investment needs.

Collective models like cooperatives and aggregation hubs also circumvent infrastructure and scale barriers when paired with technology. Connecting dispersed smallholder plots virtually via data platforms brings efficiencies of larger-scale adoption. Farmers receive bulk discounts on sustainable inputs and services. Cooperative sales, processing and logistics lower individual cost burdens. Shared community assets like machinery, labs, renewable energy and storage infrastructure are more affordable. Information sharing among users multiplies knowledge spillovers faster. Such collective sustainable models will be further strengthened by emerging 5G networks and cloud platforms that reduce per-user technology access costs.

Of course, technology alone cannot solve every challenge – sociocultural and policy barriers also must be addressed. But with focused efforts around open innovation, local adaptation, skills development and enabling policies, affordable, decentralized technologies undoubtedly have immense potential to accelerate the transition to more sustainable agricultural systems globally, even in infrastructure-poor contexts. Public-private partnerships will be key to driving these solutions at scale, empowering millions of smallholder farmers worldwide with new alternatives.

The synergistic application of tools across precision agriculture, mobile/digital platforms, low-cost automated devices, distributed ledgers, cooperative models and emerging connectivity has enormous power to overcome affordability and infrastructure barriers currently limiting sustainable practices. With holistic strategy and support, technology can help achieve global food and climate goals through grassroots agricultural transformation.

HOW ARE COMPANIES ADDRESSING THE TECHNICAL CHALLENGES OF BATTERY LIFE AND WEATHER RESILIENCE IN DRONE DELIVERY

Leave a reply

One of the biggest technical challenges facing commercial drone delivery is battery life. Companies need drones that can carry payloads of packages while still having enough power to travel longer distances and complete multiple deliveries on a single battery charge. Addressing the limitations of current battery technology is a major focus area for many drone delivery startups and tech giants.

Amazon, which has plans for Prime Air drone delivery, has invested heavily in research and development to improve battery energy density and flight duration. In 2021, they patented a new dual-battery configuration that allows drones to quickly swap out depleted batteries in mid-air using robotic arms. This “battery hot-swapping” could theoretically enable drones to fly and deliver indefinitely without needing to land and recharge. This technology would require more advanced autonomous capabilities and adds complexity.

Other companies are taking different approaches. Flytrex, a leader in drone delivery, equips its drones with efficient electric motors and optimized flight routines to maximize flight time and range on conventional lithium-ion batteries. Flight tests have demonstrated payloads of up to 6.6 pounds and flight distances of over 10 miles on a single charge. Like all electric drones, weather extremes still significantly impact battery life.

Wing, owned by Google’s parent Alphabet, focuses on optimizing battery usage through lightweight drone designs and on-board diagnostics to monitor battery health and charging rates. Their latest generation of delivery drones have doubled battery capacity compared to earlier models through advances in battery chemistry and cooling systems. Total flight times are still limited to around 30 minutes based on battery capacity and drone weight with cargo onboard.

To address this, Startup Zipline is taking a very different approach than most competitors by relying entirely on fixed-wing drones versus the traditional multirotor designs with vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) capabilities. Fixed-wing drones are far more efficient gliders capable of traveling much greater distances on less battery power. Fixed-wing delivery drones require runway style launch and landing facilities versus being able to takeoff and land anywhere like VTOL drones. Zipline’s drones can carry 4-6 pounds of medical supplies over a 50+ mile range at speeds around 100 mph while only needing 10-15 minute battery recharges between supply runs. This allows for much higher throughput versus vertical take-off drones limited to a max 30 minute flight time and smaller per-charge range.

In terms of weather resilience, most commercial drone delivery programs today remain limited to fair weather flying since extreme wind, rain, snow and ice significantly impact flight performance and safety. Electric motors and lithium battery packs are also sensitive to moisture and temperature extremes.

Companies are actively working to expand drone operations into more challenging weather conditions via airframe, power system and autonomous software innovations.

Wing has tested delivery drones in light rain and gusty winds up to around 25 miles per hour. Their drones incorporate hydrophobic coatings to shed water and brushless motors sealed against moisture ingress. Advanced computer vision and lidar mapping helps the drones autonomously navigate inclement conditions.

Amazon envisions future delivery drones able to withstand heavy downpours, high winds, icy conditions and even complete deliveries in the wake of major storms or disasters when roads may be blocked. To that end, they are developing drones using hybrid or fuel cell propulsion versus batteries alone for more weather-resilient power. Experimental designs incorporate features like deicing systems, reinforced airframes, and autonomous flight capabilities robust enough to safely route around hazards like downed trees in inclement weather.

One challenge is that regulations currently prohibit routine operations beyond visual line-of-sight, a limitation in low-visibility conditions like heavy rain or fog. Advanced sense-and-avoid and beyond visual line-of-sight technologies still need additional reliability validation by regulators before approvals for commercial BVLOS flights in all-weather conditions.

While drone delivery shows tremendous potential to revolutionize last-mile logistics, battery life limitations and sensitivity to extreme weather remain major technical hurdles slowing widespread commercial deployment. Companies are addressing these challenges through a range of innovative solutions focused on energy density, battery swapping, hybrid-electric or fuel cell propulsion, lightweight materials, autonomous software, and more weather-resilient designs. Should technologies like fixed-wing delivery drones carrying multi-day battery packs or all-weather flight capabilities via hybrid propulsion systems prove out, it could vastly expand the potential use cases and commercial viability of drone delivery worldwide. Regulatory approval of more autonomous BVLOS flight will also be important to unlocking the true potential of drone delivery systems – especially in challenging weather conditions where drones could potentially provide a more reliable option than ground vehicles. Through ongoing technological innovation, the dream of rapid urban drone delivery may soon become widespread reality.

WHAT ARE SOME POTENTIAL CHALLENGES THAT BAKER’S DOZEN MAY FACE IN IMPLEMENTING THIS STRATEGIC PLAN

Leave a reply

Baker’s Dozen will face challenges with executing their plan to expand into 5 new locations within the next two years. Rapid expansion comes with many risks that could threaten the success of the business if not properly managed. First, they will need to ensure they have the financial resources and access to capital to fund the buildout of the new locations. Significant capital expenditures will be required for commercial real estate, equipment, supplies, and hiring new staff. If growth is too aggressive and costs are underestimated, it could strain the company’s cash flows and profitability.

Second, finding and securing high quality retail spaces in prime locations will be difficult. Commercial real estate, especially for food-based businesses, is very competitive. It may take time to locate the right spaces that meet their criteria of size, visibility, traffic patterns, and demographics. Lease negotiations could also prove challenging if market demand is high. Temporary delays in opening new locations would put them off pace from their expansion goals.

Third, ramping up operations and support functions to scale with the increased size of the business poses operational risks. Hiring and training qualified managers and staff for the new locations will be a human resources challenge. Ensuring consistent quality, service standards and culture across a larger footprint is difficult without institutionalized processes, training programs and oversight functions in place. Supply chain and inventory management systems would also need to be upgraded. Issues like understaffing, poor training or weak oversight could temporarily impact the customer experience as new locations launch.

Fourth, expanding into new markets requires caution. Demand may not be as strong or customer preferences different than existing markets. Surveys, focus groups and test markets could help reduce these risks but do not guarantee success in every new area. Selecting the right high potential markets based on demographics, density and competition is important. Entering regions where the brand is unknown brings marketing challenges to build awareness and trial among new customers. Initial sales could be lower than projections if the market potential is underestimated.

Fifth, keeping a consistent brand image and customer experience across both existing and new locations is a brand management challenge. As new territories and managers are onboarded, maintaining standardized operating procedures, product quality, store layouts, cleanliness and service levels requires significant effort. Customers familiar with one location may be disappointed by small differences in another location. Rapid growth can also temporarily strain a company’s ability to enforce consistent controls and monitor performance across a larger footprint. Identifying and mitigating differences quickly is important to protect the brand.

Sixth, competition is a threat to any expansion effort. The baked goods industry has low barriers to entry, so new competitors could emerge in targeted growth markets. Customers may choose alternatives, particularly if awareness of Baker’s Dozen is still developing in new territories. Pricing strategies need to balance growth objectives with competitive pressures. Aggressive promotion and campaigns would be needed to gain trial among customers with many choices. Market share gains are not guaranteed and performance could come in below projections if competitive responses are underestimated.

Seventh, retaining key talent as the organization grows larger is difficult but important for continuity. High performing managers, bakers and customer-facing staff are critical to executing the expansion effort and maintaining standards. Rapid growth may outpace the supply of qualified workers, requiring training of new and less experienced staff. Keeping compensation, training programs and culture engaging as the business scales will be important to retaining top performers in both existing and new roles. Staff turnover during expansion could disrupt operations if not appropriately managed.

Executing ambitious expansion comes with several risks that must be effectively managed to ensure the strategic plan’s success. Baker’s Dozen will need strong leadership, governance, operational excellence and financial flexibility to navigate these potential challenges as they undertake aggressive growth. With the right resources, strategies and controls, they can mitigate threats to their business and take advantage of new market opportunities. They must be prepared for potential issues that rapid expansion could introduce and be ready to respond quickly if problems arise.

WHAT ARE SOME CHALLENGES YOU FACED WHILE IMPLEMENTING THE SUSTAINABLE FARMING SYSTEM

Leave a reply

One of the biggest challenges we faced was the initial cost associated with transitioning the farm operations to more sustainable practices. While sustainable agriculture aims to reduce costs over the long run through techniques like composting, cover cropping, and using fewer chemical inputs, making these changes required a significant up-front investment. Purchasing no-till planters and drills to allow for reduced or no-till planting of cover crops was quite expensive. Establishing fencing and watering infrastructure for managed grazing of livestock also represented a sizable capital outlay. Transitioning to organic practices meant investing in new equipment specifically designed for small organic farms to cultivate, harvest, and process crops without synthetic fertilizers and pesticides.

Certification costs associated with organic, regenerative, or Climate Beneficial certification programs were also non-trivial and ongoing expenses that were harder to afford initially during the transition process. Staff training on new sustainable farming techniques like holistic planned grazing and integrated pest management also required both time and financial commitments. The learning curve for all of us on the farm to implement practices markedly different than conventional commodity farming methods was steep and riddled with challenges. Mistakes were inevitable as we developed our skills in agroecology and adapted techniques to our specific soils and climate.

Related to the financial challenges was a period of lowered productivity and profitability during the transition years as we phased out synthetic inputs and shifted to a systems-based approach with living cover crops and perennial plantings. Yields of some annual row crops were negatively impacted in the early transition years as we worked to build up soil organic matter and shift to nutrient cycling using managed livestock grazing. Selling products at a price premium to recoup transition costs and maintain margins also presented challenges related to developing new market channels and educating consumers.

Some crop failures or losses to new or newly managed pests were perhaps unavoidable as we fine-tuned our sustainable practices. These represented setbacks and added risks to an already difficult financial transition time for the farm. Maintaining cash flow during this period of learning and land rehabilitation required strategic planning and often relying on off-farm income or operating capital sources to bridge transition costs versus conventional commodity farming revenues.

Educating and training our entire farm team to manage and work with living soils, integrated systems, and holistic livestock management also had its challenges. Not all of our experienced farmers and crew were equally receptive to the transition or philosophically aligned with our regenerative mission. Turnover of some team members increased training demands on remaining staff as sustainable practices evolved. Coordinating livestock, crops, and crews working in a holistically planned integrated system required attaining a new level of complexity compared to single-enterprise conventional operations.

Establishing infrastructure for biological pest control like hedgerows, cover crops, predator habitats and beneficial insect propagation took both time and space away from cash crops. It challenged us to think about short and long-term tradeoffs, systems-level impacts, and profit versus utility of different land uses. Maintaining habitats for allies like pollinators and natural enemies, fallow or minimal tillage periods, hedgerows, riparian buffers and woodlands reduced our net cropland and presented challenges for optimizing productivity and cash flows versus sustainabilityenhancing landscape features over the long run.

Educating the surrounding community about our changes to sustainable practices and the rationale behind them also proved challenging. Some skepticism and resistance emerged from neighbors attuned to conventional production systems. Local crop advisors, extension services and agribusiness representatives used to promoting synthetic inputs were not always supportive either. We faced an uphill marketing challenge with consumers unfamiliar with organic and regenerative practices versus industrial agriculture norms. Transitioning a farm takes resilience, flexibility, perseverance and a longterm view through challenges. By adopting principles of ecological systems thinking, prioritizing soil health and holistic management, the long term viability, resilience and community benefits are transformative.

Transitioning to sustainable farming practices presented significant challenges related to upfront costs, lowered productivity during transition years, crop failures and pest management issues, training needs, coordination complexity, community education requirements, and more. By developing the skills of agroecology and regenerating our soils and biodiversity over the long run, the farm has enhanced its profitability, resilience to climate change, and ability to support our community through challenges. The transition was difficult but worth it for a brighter agricultural future.