Tag Archives: literature

COULD YOU EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A LITERATURE REVIEW AND ORIGINAL RESEARCH FOR A CAPSTONE PROJECT

A literature review and original research are two important components of many capstone projects at the undergraduate and graduate level. While both involve an in-depth exploration of a topic, they differ significantly in their overall goals and methodologies.

A literature review is a comprehensive examination of the scholarly works, research studies, and theories that have addressed a particular topic, issue, or research question. The goal of a literature review is to summarize and synthesize the key findings and perspectives of the scholarly literature on the subject. It demonstrates to the reader that the student or researcher has become an expert in the secondary source material published on the topic.

Conducting a literature review primarily involves locating, selecting, evaluating, and synthesizing relevant scholarly sources such as peer-reviewed journal articles, academic books, government reports, and scholarly reviews. It does not typically involve primary data collection or experimentation. The student examines, compares, and contrasts what previous researchers have said about the topic in their published work. Key elements of a strong literature review include identifying relationships and gaps in the literature, discussing major themes and perspectives, determining the significance of the topic based on previous works, and showing how the proposed research will address gaps or expand current understanding.

Original research, on the other hand, goes beyond just summarizing and critiquing existing literature to make an original contribution of new knowledge through primary data collection and analysis. With original research, the student identifies a specific research question or hypothesis and designs a study to directly investigate or test that question. This requires determining an appropriate research methodology such as qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods. Primary data is then directly collected using methods like interviews, surveys, experiments, observations, or archival research. The data undergoes rigorous analysis using relevant analytic techniques in order to determine new findings, draw original conclusions, and potentially generalize the results. Original contributions involve producing results, theories, or insights that have not previously been published.

Some key characteristics that differentiate original research in a capstone project include:

Formulating a specific, focused research question that has not yet been fully explored or answered in existing literature. This helps ensure the study will yield original findings.

Choosing an appropriate research design (e.g. quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods) to directly investigate and answer the research question. This may involve experiments, field work, interviews, or other empirical methods.

Collecting primary data through hands-on methods like interviews, surveys, observations, experiments rather than solely relying on secondary data analysis.

Analyzing the original data through valid statistical or qualitative analytic techniques in order to discover new patterns, relationships, or theories that have not been previously described.

Drawing original conclusions and implications from the findings of the study. These conclusions should offer new insights, perspectives, or applications beyond what is described in existing literature.

Discussing the limitations, validity, and generalizability of the results to demonstrate rigor. As well as acknowledging how the findings specifically address gaps or expand current knowledge on the topic based on the original research question posed.

Following strict ethical guidelines when directly interacting with or observing human subjects during data collection for the study. This includes obtaining necessary permissions and ensuring confidentiality.

Having the research and methodology sections clearly describe the process well enough that other researchers could in theory replicate or build upon the original study.

A literature review primarily synthesizes and critically evaluates previous research whereas original research makes a novel empirical contribution through a focused research question directly investigated using valid methodology and analytic techniques. Both serve crucial roles in a capstone project, but one examines what is known while the other aims to discover what is not yet known about a topic through direct data collection and analysis. Understanding the distinction between these two approaches is vital for students conducting meaningful capstone work.

LITERATURE SCOPING FOR MBA CAPSTONE PROJECT

Literature scoping is a vital first step when beginning work on your MBA capstone project. The capstone requires synthesizing existing research and using it to support your own analysis, so it’s important to cast a wide net in exploring what others have already published on your topic. With properly conducted literature scoping, you can gain important insights that will help shape your project design, identify gaps where your work can contribute new knowledge, and find examples to support your arguments later on in the final paper.

To conduct effective literature scoping, start by brainstorming keywords and phrases related to your topic area. Consider the major constructs or variables involved, as well as synonyms. For example, if your topic concerns marketing strategy for luxury goods, some initial keywords could include “luxury brands, luxury marketing, brand positioning, product differentiation, consumer behavior.” Save these terms somewhere for future reference as your searching evolves.

The next step is selecting appropriate databases and directories to search. As an MBA student, focus first on business and management research databases like ABI/INFORM, Business Source Complete, and EBSCO. Don’t neglect cross-disciplinary sources like Google Scholar which can surface publications across many domains. Government and NGO sites may also offer reports relevant to your industry or issue. Thoroughly searching multiple databases increases the breadth and depth of sources found.

When searching selected databases, use controlled vocabularies and thesauri if available. This helps retrieve articles on closely related ideas that may not use your exact search terms. Apply appropriate filters like publication dates (focus on recent 5-10 years unless researching an historical topic), languages (usually stick to English), and document types (include journal articles, reports, books). Don’t eliminate sources based on their publication outlets until reviewing content – works from obscure or student journals occasionally present novel insights.

Taking good notes as you search and review results is critical. Capture the most pertinent details from each source in a standardized format like APA or MLA so they can easily be incorporated into your reference list later. As a minimum, record the author(s), year, title, publication information, and brief descriptive notes summarizing the paper’s main arguments or findings relevant to your research question. Saving or printing full-text PDFs of especially useful sources makes them readily accessible as you progress.

Organize and analyze the references you’ve collected using tools like bibliography software, spreadsheets, or coding/annotation features in PDF readers. Look for patterns in methodologies employed, gaps in existing research, and how findings do or don’t link together to form a cohesive picture of the area. You may find it helpful to group sources thematically to identify dominant perspectives or debates within the literature.

Iterating your searching with the new insights and questions that emerge from this analysis will yield an even richer set of sources. Discuss potential gaps or areas needing further exploration with your capstone supervisor early to refine your topic idea into a feasible research project. Well-executed literature scoping lays the foundation for situating your work within the published knowledge base, justifying your proposed contributions, and crafting a thoughtful research design capable of extending the discourse. With thorough scoping, you’ll be well equipped to craft a capstone proposal that demonstrates your command of the terrain.

CAN YOU PROVIDE SOME TIPS FOR CONDUCTING A THOROUGH LITERATURE REVIEW

Develop a plan for your literature review. Come up with a list of keywords, key authors, journals, databases etc. that are relevant to your topic. Define the scope and purpose of your review. Will it be comprehensive or focused on a certain aspect? Develop search terms to find relevant literature.

Do preliminary searches of bibliographic databases and other sources to get an initial sense of the available literature. Academic search engines like Google Scholar, ProQuest, Scopus and subject-specific databases will allow you to search for journal articles, books, conference papers and more. Search reference lists of relevant papers for additional sources.

Develop inclusion and exclusion criteria for literature. Decide what types of literature and from what date ranges will be included. For example, you may focus only on peer-reviewed journal articles published in the last 10-15 years written in English. Keep detailed notes on your criteria.

Use effective search strategies in databases. Start with controlled vocabulary/subject terms for your topic when available. Use Boolean search operators (AND, OR, NOT) to combine terms. Do iterative searches to expand or narrow your search. Search for variations in terminology.

Screen titles and abstracts against your criteria to identify sources for full text review. Download, request or note citations of relevant sources. Keep a bibliography or reference list as you go along using a citation management system like EndNote, Mendeley etc. This will help organize your sources.

Read selected sources in full. As you read take detailed notes summarizing key points, methods, findings, theories and concepts. Note agreements and disagreements between studies. Highlight useful quotes that relate to your review questions. You may need to read some sources multiple times.

Analyze and evaluate sources critically. Consider research design, methods, sample, measures. Note sources of funding and potential biases. Weigh evidence from different types of research. Use critical appraisal checklists for different study designs. Analyze conceptual frameworks used, research gaps identified.

Synthesize findings thematically from multiple sources rather than summarizing individual studies. Group studies together by factors such as topic, methodology, theoretical perspective, chronology etc. Compare and contrast evidence on your review questions while also identifying consistencies. Note relationships between studies.

Interpret overall significance and implications of research. Explain how studies connect or differ in their findings, scope and theories. Identify how research adds to the overall field. Note limitations and knowledge gaps. Explain how research could be improved, extended or applied. Assess overall strength and quality of evidence while remaining objective.

Structure the literature review around key themes, concepts and topics rather than individual studies. Develop an argument while discussing relevant literature. Provide insight into how reviewed literature relates to your topic and purposes of the review. Guide the reader through your synthesis of evidence.

Reference all sources using a consistent citation style. Include all sources cited within the text in a reference list. The reference list should contain full citations for all sources consulted even if not directly cited within the text. Check for accuracy and consistency of citations.

Provide a critical summary and conclusions. Briefly reiterate the key areas, discussions and debates covered in the review. Identify significant findings as they relate to your stated purposes and objectives. Highlight major limitations, generalizability and implications of body of literature. Suggest directions for future research. Consider review’s limitations and suggest ways to improve future versions.

Conducting a thorough literature review takes significant time, focus and effort. By developing and sticking to a clear plan, searching systematically, analysing and synthesising critically, and structuring the review thoughtfully – you can ensure a high quality output that justifies, contextualises and advances knowledge on your topic of interest. Maintaining organization and keeping detailed records at each stage is also crucial for producing a rigorous, replicable literature review.