Tag Archives: near

WHAT ARE SOME OF THE CHALLENGES THAT CAPSTONE FACES IN MAINTAINING ITS NEAR RECTILINEAR HALO ORBIT

One of the biggest challenges Capstone faces is precisely controlling its trajectory using its minimal onboard propulsion system to maintain its highly elliptical orbit around the Moon’s lagrange point Lunar Distant Retrograde Orbit (DRRO). The DRRO is an unstable three-body orbit that requires periodic station keeping to counteract thermal influences, spacecraft dynamics, and other perturbations that could cause its orbit to drift over time.

Maintaining this precarious orbit takes an enormous amount of precise orbital maneuvering. Capstone only carries about 22 pounds of propellant for its cold-gas thrusters, which must carefully control the cubesat’s position and velocity over its planned 6 month demonstration mission. Any propulsion errors could cause the smallsat to go off course and drift out of the desired DRRO orbit. The lack of significant onboard fuel means maneuvers must be extremely efficient and errors are difficult to correct.

The complex natural gravitational forces around the Moon-Earth lagrange point make station keeping in the DRRO quite challenging. Disturbances from the Earth and Moon’s gravity, along with minimal onboard sensors and actuators, mean Capstone’s navigation and attitude control systems must operate with extremely high accuracy to counteract orbital perturbations. Even tiny imbalances or uncertainties in onboard sensors and thrusters could accumulate over time and degrade the orbit.

Thermal influences from variations in sunlight on the spacecraft also perturb its trajectory and must be actively countered. As Capstone orbits in the perpetually changing thermal environment around the lagrange point, solar heating and infrared radiation pressure impart small forces on its structure and components. Changes in the cubesat’s overall density, shape, or center of mass due to minor expansions or movements of its parts in response to thermal swings produce imbalances that require regular trajectory corrections. The lack of an active thermal control system means these thermal disturbances cannot be prevented, adding complexity for maneuver planning.

CommunicationsBlackouts as Capstone passes behind the Moon during each half of its 6 day orbit are also challenging. Navigation depends on tracking radian position from Earth, but loss of signal during the blackout durations degrades onboard state estimates. While stored navigation data helps bridge outages, uncertainties accumulate faster without direct observation and correction. Blackouts reduce the amount of monitoring possible and periods available to assess maneuvers, plan future burns, and redirect the orbit if needed.

The tiny cubesat also faces risks from the space environment around the Moon, such as harmful charged particles in the magnetosphere and unpredictable meteoroid and orbital debris impacts. While Capstone has no moving parts, long term exposure to radiation could potentially compromise electronic systems or navigation sensors and exacerbate station keeping difficulties over its 6+ month mission. The increasing congestion of orbital debris also raises concerns about the potential for high speed collisions that could damage hardware or nudge the orbit off course. Any glitches or anomalies would be difficult to pinpoint and repair on the remote, autonomous smallsat. Maintaining CGPS’s hazardous but precise near-rectilinear halo orbit demands immense precision, planning and risk mitigation from both the spacecraft and ground teams. Even with NASA’s extensive experience, the demonstration provides an opportunity to assess the challenges of operating in this demanding region of space. Lessons from Capstone’s station keeping campaign will help inform strategies for future long term lunar and Mars missions that propose exploiting unstable multi-body dynamics for fuel efficient transit or infrastructure purposes. Precise onboard propulsion, complex orbital dynamics, minimal onboard resources or redundancy, communications gaps, and potential environmental impacts combine to present a considerable ongoing navigation and control problem for the tiny Capstone spacecraft over its six month lunar mission. Careful management of numerous error sources and perturbations will be required to keep the cubesat circling stably in its intended near-rectilinear halo orbit, validating innovative orbital techniques for future exploration.

WHAT ARE SOME OF THE KEY ADVANTAGES OF THE NEAR RECTILINEAR HALO ORBIT NRHO FOR LUNAR MISSIONS

The near rectilinear halo orbit, or NRHO, is a special type of halo orbit that was selected by NASA for the Gateway – a small space station that will orbit the Moon and serve as a staging point for Artemis missions. There are several advantages of using an NRHO for the Gateway and future lunar missions compared to other possible orbits.

One major benefit of the NRHO is its stability. Halo orbits around the second Lagrangian point (L2) of the Earth-Moon system are dynamically stable, meaning a spacecraft can remain in this orbit without having to perform complex orbital maintenance maneuvers to counteract perturbations. This allows for long-term dwell of orbital assets like the Gateway. In contrast, low lunar orbits require station-keeping to account for orbital decay over time. The intrinsic stability of the NRHO reduces operational costs and Complexity for missions utilizing the Gateway.

A linked advantage is that the Gateway’s NRHO enables continuous line-of-sight communication with Earth without interruptions from the Moon getting in the way. This “stable remote platform” feature provides mission planners assured and uninterrupted command and control of robonaut or manned sorties from the Gateway to the lunar surface, increasing safety. Low lunar orbits by comparison have intermittent communications blackout periods. Reliable comms through Gateway are crucial for surface missions.

Another key benefit of the Gateway’s NRHO is its free return capability. If engines fail on a spacecraft departing the Gateway for the lunar surface, the craft’s trajectory will return it to the Earth-Moon system without the need for correction. This ensuresBuilt insafe mode return for astronautswithout depleting mission resources. Low lunar orbits lack this fail-safe free return capacity, necessitating precise maneuvers and significant propellant usage for any emergencies.

The phasing properties of the NRHO mean that missions departing from the Gateway can access any part of the lunar surface within a single orbit, offering coverage flexibility for surface sorties, landings or cargo deliveries. This facilitates global access unlike low polar or equatorial orbits which see the same side of the Moon on each pass. The Gateway’s NRHO phasing point allows surface missions to utilize minimal propellant for optimal transit to target locations.

The orbital altitude of the NRHO above the lunar surface, averaging around 70,000 km, also provides an ideal vantage point for long-term scientific observation of the Moon without interference from short-term fluctuations. Platforms in the Gateway will be able to conduct persistent solar astronomy studies as well as high-resolution imaging surveys of the entire lunar farside which remains occluded from Earth-based observation. Long duration monitoring supports rigorous analysis impossible through brief fly-bys alone.

The NRHO actually fosters economical trajectories allowing spacecraft to take advantage of gravity assists from both Earth and Moon, reducing propellant demands. Missions can utilize minimum energy ballistic transfers from low Earth orbit to the Gateway then onward surface excursions. This conserves precious onboard fuel compared to direct transfers and lower orbits. Lower propellant needs cuts spacecraft mass and launch vehicle lift requirements, easing deployment logistics and decreasing costs. Recent studies have shown NRHO transit mass savings can reach 30% compared to lunar surface injection.

The Gateway’s Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit provides unmatched accessibility, communications, crew safety assurances, scientific value, and most importantly – cost effectiveness – through its inherent dynamical characteristics. Its advantages over direct low lunar orbits truly establish it as the optimal orbital choice for establishing a sustainable lunar presence and enabling the long term exploration, development and commercialization of the Moon under the Artemis program and beyond. The decision to position the Gateway in NRHO demonstrates the care and thoroughness that has gone into mission architecture design for enabling sustainable and ambitious human exploration of the lunar surface from this unique vantage point.