Tag Archives: necessary

WHAT ARE SOME STRATEGIES FOR SECURING ACCESS TO RESOURCES NECESSARY FOR PRIMARY RESEARCH

Gaining access to resources is often a crucial step in the research process, as primary research frequently relies on being able to observe phenomena firsthand, interact directly with human or animal subjects, gain entry to private or restricted areas, utilize specialized equipment or facilities, and view documents not otherwise publicly available. While access needs vary widely depending on the topic, methods, and goals of each research project, some generally applicable best practices can improve researchers’ chances of obtaining what they require.

First, thoroughly researching both the resources sought and the protocols/requirements for accessing them is essential. Make sure to understand precisely what is entailed in terms of permission levels, access limitations, qualifying criteria, regulations, confidentiality agreements, and any fees or costs involved. Consulting directly with those who control the resources can provide clarity on feasibility and any uncertainty in the proposal. Starting early allows maximum time for dialogue, troubleshooting obstacles, and iterative feedback/refinement of the access strategy.

Second, carefully crafting a formal written access request tailored to the specific situation is important. Provide compelling justification for why the resources are necessary, appropriate, and will be safely and responsibly utilized. Focus on how the proposed research aligns with and benefits the controlling entity’s interests, values, policies and any other priorities. Clearly communicate plans to respect subjects’ privacy, confidentiality of information obtained, security of physical spaces and digital data, as well as intellectual property considerations. Specifically address any perceived risks and propose effective mitigation approaches.

Third, it is wise to leverage personal and professional connections whenever feasible. Reaching out to acquaintances within the target institution, relevant professional associations or political circles can open doors more readily than an impersonal letter. The energy and enthusiasm of capable advocates elsewhere in one’s network elevates credibility. Meeting key decision makers in person, if permitted, allows forming a direct rapport and addressing concerns through dialogue. Following up afterwards to express appreciation for their consideration also fosters ongoing goodwill.

Fourth, consider offering something in exchange for the requested access, recognizing that altruism alone may not suffice given legal/ethical obligations and limited resources. Propose value-added collaboration like providing summary analyses, contributing subject-matter expertise, acknowledging the organization in publications or inviting them to related events. Volunteer unpaid services or even make a modest monetary donation commensurate with budget. Compromise and compromise creatively to achieve mutual benefit wherever possible.

Fifth, persist diplomatically if initial requests are denied. Request feedback on deficiencies and resubmit strengthened proposals addressing the issues raised. Suggest reasonable alternatives scopes, timeframes or supervision models that still serve research needs while accommodating constraints. Appeal decisions through approved processes if miscommunications or reconsideration could yield a different outcome. Know when to graciously accept “no” and redirect efforts productively rather than irritate decision makers with stubborn insistences.

Sixth, properly handle any access that is approved by fulfilling commitments to safeguard subjects, respect policies, share results, protect proprietary interests and more. Maintain open communication throughout and provide timely updates. Send heartfelt appreciation afterwards. Upheld integrity builds warranted confidence for future cooperation, while breaches jeopardize it for one’s self and others. Continually evaluate experiences for lessons applicable to subsequent requests as careers progress.

Gaining primary research access often mandates meticulous planning, optimizing known factors within one’s control while judiciously navigating social, regulatory and resource realities beyond. A balanced combination of diligence, interpersonal skills, compromise and perseverance within ethical bounds can overcome many barriers with patience and understanding on all sides. Proper stewardship of access then granted further enables valuable work for the benefit of scholarship and society.

HOW CAN HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS ENSURE THAT PATIENTS HAVE ACCESS TO NECESSARY POST DISCHARGE SERVICES?

Ensuring patients have access to necessary post-discharge services is critical for facilitating recovery and preventing readmissions. There are several strategies healthcare providers can utilize.

First, providers must conduct comprehensive discharge planning which assesses what services each patient will need after leaving the hospital such as medication management, wound care, physical therapy, skilled nursing, home health, etc. This planning should ideally begin on admission so there is sufficient time to coordinate everything. During the planning process, providers need to screen for any social determinants of health risks like food/housing insecurity which if unaddressed could negatively impact outcomes.

Second, providers need to verify that patients being discharged have all the necessary medical equipment, supplies, medications they require as well as instructions for how to use everything and who to contact with any questions or issues that arise. This often involves working with durable medical equipment companies, pharmacies, and home health agencies to ensure everything is in place and operational by the time patients leave.

Third, providers need to conduct patient education prior to discharge regarding their diagnosis, treatment plan, warning signs that should prompt contacting a provider, and how to self-manage their condition at home. This education often involves multimodal teaching methods like verbal and written instructions plus return demonstrations to evaluate comprehension. It is also important for education to involve family members or caregivers who will be assisting patients.

Fourth, providers need to make timely post-discharge follow up appointments with primary care providers or specialists, as appropriate, before patients leave the hospital. This involves direct scheduling of appointments which may require addressing any transportation barriers. Following up within 7-10 days of discharge has been shown to reduce readmissions. Additional interventions like transitional care clinics or in-home visits can help bridge the time until a follow up appointment occurs.

Fifth, providers need to leverage technology and community resources to support patients post-discharge. This includes ensuring patients enroll in remote monitoring programs if applicable for their condition and prescribed treatments which allow providers to keep tabs on vital signs and progress from a distance. It also means ensuring patients are aware of and connected to any applicable community-based support programs for things like Meals on Wheels, food banks, transportation assistance, adult day care, homemaking help, support groups, etc.

Sixth, providers need robust discharge communication with outpatient providers including primary care physicians and specialists. This involves sending timely and comprehensive discharge summaries that detail the hospitalization, procedures, treatments, changes to medications or treatments, follow up needs, and open clinical questions. Strong bidirectional communication helps outpatient providers take over care seamlessly and addresses any gaps preemptively.

Seventh, healthcare systems and institutions need to closely track metrics like 30-day readmission rates, ED visit rates, and patient/family experience surveys specifically focused on transitions of care in order to identify gaps, continually refine processes, and ensure accessibility of post-discharge services according to community need. This may require facilities partnering with community organizations, expanding existing programs, or piloting new initiatives based on data trends.

By implementing comprehensive discharge planning that begins early, verifying patients have necessary medical equipment and instructions, conducting proper patient/caregiver education, making timely follow up appointments, leveraging technology and community resources, sending robust communication to outpatient providers, and closely tracking post-acute outcomes – healthcare providers can significantly improve patients’ access to vital post-discharge services needed for recovery and meeting their goals of care. Coordinated, patient-centered planning from admit to well after discharge is key.