Tag Archives: private

WHAT ARE SOME EXAMPLES OF PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS IN SMART CITY CYBERSECURITY

Leave a reply

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) are becoming increasingly common in the smart cities sector as more responsibilities for critical infrastructure are shared between government agencies and private companies. When it comes to cybersecurity, PPPs allow for expertise, resources, and capabilities from both the public and private sectors to be leveraged to better protect smart city systems and data from growing cyber threats. Here are some key examples of PPPs that have emerged for smart city cybersecurity:

One major example is Singapore’s Smart Nation Cybersecurity Collaboration Programme. Through this program, the Cyber Security Agency of Singapore partners with over 30 technology companies like Cisco, Thales, and DXC Technology to co-develop solutions, conduct joint testing and training, and share threat intelligence. The goal is to foster a collaborative ecosystem to strengthen the cyber defenses of Singapore’s smart nation initiatives. Some specific projects under this program include developing an IoT security certification framework and establishing an AI and cyber range lab for testing new technologies.

In Europe, the city of Barcelona has engaged in a long-term PPP with Telefonica to develop and run its smart city command center and operations. Part of this partnership involves jointly managing Barcelona’s cyber risk, with Telefonica providing security services and monitoring for the city’s IT and IoT infrastructure. They conduct regular vulnerability assessments, patch management, malware detection and response. Some of the data shared between the city and Telefonica is also anonymized and analyzed to help strengthen future security measures for smart city systems.

In the U.S., a number of state and local governments have initiated smart city PPPs focused on cybersecurity. For example, the state of Rhode Island has partnered with Johnson Controls, Dell Technologies and other tech firms via the Rhode Island FastFund program to deploy smart city technologies like connected street lights. These companies provide ongoing security services and incident response capabilities to the state as the programs expand. Meanwhile in Columbus, Ohio the extensive smart city testbed known as Smart Columbus has engaged with Qualcomm to implement mobile-first security solutions and edge computing architectures integrated with the city’s operations technology systems.

On a broader scale, organizations like the non-profit CyberSecurity Coalition in Los Angeles facilitate collaboration between the public sector, private enterprises, and academia to enhance protection of critical infrastructure across the region. Key initiatives have included conducting emergency response exercises that replicate data breaches or cyberattacks against smart city utilities. Coalition members work together to identify vulnerabilities, simulate incidents, and improve coordination of recovery efforts between different stakeholders.

In the transportation sector, public transit agencies have signed deals with security giants like Cisco to deploy next-generation network and endpoint security across rail, bus and autonomous vehicle fleets. Widespread deployment of WiFi, ticketing, SCADA and other smart mobility technologies have increased cyber risk profiles, driving a need for scalable managed security services delivered through PPPs. For example, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority in New York partnered with BT to fortify security controls for IT, operational technology and passenger facing systems used across the subway, commuter rail and bus network serving millions daily.

On a city level, both Boston and Atlanta have pursued comprehensive smart city PPPs with Accenture that entail applying cybersecurity best practices and governance frameworks across all stages of new IoT project deployment. Services include security architecture design, access management, encryption, monitoring for anomalies, incident response procedures, vulnerability management and employee training. These engagements recognize that robust security must be “baked in” from initial planning of smart city systems rather than an afterthought.

Looking ahead, more PPPs are sure to emerge that take cybersecurity collaboration between cities and technology vendors to the next level. Joint security operation centers, community hacker spaces for controlled “attack” simulations, cross-sector information sharing arrangements and combined research on next-gen security controls are some areas ripe for deeper cooperation through public-private models. With collective resources and expertise unified, smart cities stand the best chance of defending against inevitable cyber threats constantly evolving alongside new connected infrastructure and digital services.

As the surface area of attack for malicious cyber actors continues expanding due to growing smart city deployments, forging strategic security partnerships between government, industry and research will remain mission critical. Examples demonstrated that PPPs provide a framework for the public and private sectors to jointly invest, innovate and problem solve and boost cyber defenses for these complex, interconnected urban networks of the future.

HOW CAN CITIES ENCOURAGE CITIZENS TO USE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION INSTEAD OF PRIVATE CARS

Leave a reply

Cities have several options available to encourage more citizens to switch from private cars to public transportation. One of the most effective approaches is to invest significantly in improving and expanding public transportation systems. When public transit is fast, frequent, convenient and comfortable, it becomes a much more attractive alternative to driving. Things like dedicated bus and train lanes, traffic signal prioritization, modern vehicles, covered platforms and stations, real-time passenger information and contactless payment systems all help make public transportation a premium service.

In addition to better infrastructure and service, affordable fares also play a pivotal role. Keeping ticket and pass prices low relative to the cost of driving and parking makes public transit financially sensible for more people. Some cities offer programs like income-based or employer-subsidized fare discounts to further improve accessibility. Free or very low cost options for students, seniors and low-income residents can also help increase ridership. Revenue tools like high parking fees, road tolls and congestion charges in certain areas provide a funding source for upgraded public transit networks and discounted fares.

Implementing dedicated bus lanes, cycle paths and sidewalk improvements makes public transportation more directly competitive with driving by shortening travel times. Ensuring safe, attractive pedestrian routes to and from transit stops expands the zone of accessibility. Integrating bicycles and electric scooters through dedicated parking, rental programs and carriers on vehicles allows for multi-modal connections that don’t rely solely on private vehicles for end-to-end trips. Convenient integrated journey planning apps showing multiple trip options help challenge the habit of always driving.

Strategic urban planning that focuses new housing and commercial development near existing and planned public transit corridors rather than highway-centric sprawl also incentivizes transit use. Higher density, mixed-use environments make public transportation scheduling and routing more efficient while reducing distances between origins and destinations walkable from transit stops. Limiting and strategically pricing new parking construction sends a signal that cities aim to prioritize alternative modes over private automobile dependence.

Disincentives for driving like reduced and costlier parking, congestion pricing in dense areas with ample transit alternatives and emissions-based vehicle registration fees also shift the overall transportation costs in favor of public options. While unpopular, modest gasoline taxes that fund transportation infrastructure improvements including transit can influence decisions at the margin. Restricting vehicular access to certain streets, like downtown cores, at peak periods nudges drivers to consider public transit, cycling or walking instead.

A combination of robust infrastructure investments, affordable fares, good urban design, disincentives and smart logistical solutions creates conditions where high-quality public transportation becomes genuinely preferable to driving for most trips within cities. Changing long-held habits requires many supportive policies together, not in isolation. It also necessitates effective multilingual communications campaigns to raise awareness of all the mobility options available. Tracking and publicly reporting ridership gains helps demonstrate progress and continued commitment to priorities beyond automobility. Switching significant numbers of car trips to public transit relies on convenient, affordable and reliable systems within accessibility of most residents.

In the long run, reducing per capita private vehicle ownership should also be a priority. This requires affordable housing located near public transportation, supporting goods delivery services eliminating trip needs, promoting vehicle and ride sharing programs, and gradually transitioning commercial vehicle fleets to electric powered models. Transitioning to renewable energy sources for public transportation can help address sustainability challenges and changing climate conditions over time. Public spaces reclaimed from roadways can also support placemaking, recreation and community events to further foster alternative transportation cultures. All of these lifestyle shifts take sustained effort and political will from city leaders committed to curbing automobile dependence. But well-designed policies prove public transportation can become the first choice for urban mobility.

HOW CAN INDIA ENSURE LONG TERM STABILITY IN ITS RENEWABLE ENERGY POLICIES TO ATTRACT PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION

Leave a reply

India has made commendable progress in scaling up renewable energy in recent years. To achieve its ambitious target of 450 GW by 2030 and meet the energy needs of its growing economy, it is crucial that it ensures long-term stable and predictable policies. Only then will there be increased confidence among private players to invest significantly in renewable capacity addition. Some key measures that India can take are:

Formulate a comprehensive long-term national renewable energy policy with clear long-term goals for at least 10-20 years. The current policies have 5-year targets which do not provide enough certainty. A long-term policy will signal intent and direction. It should lay out a planned transition away from fossil fuels over 20-30 years. This will boost investor confidence that policies will remain stable over the long run.

Continue with schemes like competitive bidding through reverse auctions but ensure auction targets are well-staggered over 5-10 years to avoid boom-bust cycles. This will provide a steady pipeline of projects for developers and component manufacturers to invest in. Flexibilities may be introduced to factor in future cost reductions and technological changes.

Phase out all direct subsidies and move to a fixed-feed in-tariff (FIT) regime determined through auctions for different renewable resource zones. Staggered long-term FIT contracts of 15-20 years should provide assured returns. This will reduce risks for investors and banks, and attract more competitive bids. Contracts can be linked to inflation to ensure tariffs remain attractive.

Establish an independent national Renewable Energy Regulatory Commission on the lines of electricity regulators. This will provide long-term regulatory certainty and consistency in policy implementation. It can oversee auction designs, Power Purchase Agreements (PPA), grid connectivity etc. to make the system more transparent and attractive.

Simplify and streamline clearances and approvals through a single-window system. Liaise with state governments to expedite land acquisition, transmission infrastructure development and grid connectivity approvals. Ensure dispute resolution mechanisms are strong to reduce delayed payments risks. This will significantly reduce project implementation timelines.

Bring tax and financing reforms through incentives like accelerated depreciation, concessional duties on equipment, green bonds etc. to make financing renewable projects more competitive vis-a-vis fossil fuels. Offer Viability Gap Funding for projects in resource-rich areas lacking infrastructure to kickstart development.

Build capacity through training programs to develop a skilled local workforce for maintaining renewable energy systems. Create dedicated credit lines and financing packages through institutions like IREDA and Green Energy Corridor projects to scale up R&D, manufacturing and project development capacity within India over the long-run.

Put in place robust mechanisms for forecasting and scheduling of renewable power. Invest heavily in modernizing the grid, energy storage and developing a national renewable energy grid to balance variability through inter-state connectivity. Stringent quality control and technical standards can boost consumer and installer confidence.

Promote domestic and global green finance through registration on global carbon exchanges, emission trading and labeling programs. Multilateral cooperation on just energy transition programs can leverage greater international financing support.

Undertake sustained IEC campaigns to build wider public and political support for long-term policy consistency. This will reduce policy risks from changes in government priorities over time. Long-term visibility and policy-level support is vital for attracting significant private investment in building new zero-carbon energy infrastructure and supply chains in India.

Implementing these comprehensive measures can power India’s renewable energy transition by providing the predictability, bankability and enabling policy ecosystem essential to unleash massive private sector involvement over the coming decades. With consistent long-term policies and a conducive investment environment, India has enormous potential to emerge as a global renewable energy leader and achieve its ambitious climate and energy goals through collaborative efforts of the government and private sector. This will lay the foundation for a more sustainable, secure and prosperous low-carbon future energy system.