Tag Archives: trading


The European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) is a cap-and-trade system implemented in 2005 that aims to combat climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions from heavy energy-using industries in the EU, including power plants. Under the EU ETS, there is a declining cap on the total amount of certain greenhouse gases that can be emitted by installations covered by the system. Within this cap, companies receive or buy emission allowances which each allow emissions of 1 tonne of carbon dioxide equivalents. Companies can buy and sell allowances as needed in annual emissions trading auctions and on the secondary market. This creates a price signal encouraging greenhouse gas reductions where they can be made most cost-effectively.

The EU ETS has played an important role in driving the deployment of renewable energy sources across Europe. The carbon price signal created by the trading of emission allowances under the EU ETS incentivizes power generators to switch away from fossil fuel-based generation towards lower-carbon alternatives such as renewable energy sources. Several studies have found that the carbon price resulting from the EU ETS has increased the deployment of renewable energy capacity in the power sector across the EU. For example, a study by the European Environment Agency found that about 45% of new renewable capacity installed between 2008-2015 could be attributed to the impact of carbon pricing under the EU ETS. This effect is due to renewable energy sources such as wind and solar having very low marginal generation costs once invested, giving them a competitive advantage over fossil fuel generation as carbon prices rise.

The increased deployment of renewable energies under the EU ETS also displaces fossil fuel generation, contributing to emission reductions in the capped sectors. A study published in Nature Climate Change found that cumulative emission reductions due to renewable energy deployment driven by the EU ETS amounted to around 20 million tonnes of CO2 between 2008-2015. This displacement effect amplifies the overall impact of the emissions trading system on emission reductions beyond a simple cap-and-trade mechanism. The incentive for renewable energy provided by the carbon price is largely dependent on the stability and predictability of the price signal. Periods of low and volatile carbon prices, such as those seen in Phase 2 and Phase 3 of the EU ETS to date, undermine this effect to some extent.

The EU ETS also indirectly supports renewable energy deployment through specific provisions within the design of the system. For example, the EU ETS electricity sector benchmark used for free allocation distribution considers a renewable energy benchmark. This favors renewable generators who face no carbon costs and thus need fewer free allowances. Also, the directive establishing the EU ETS allows Member States to use revenues from EU ETS allowance auctions to support national renewable energy and energy efficiency measures. Many countries have implemented such ‘carbon pricing measures’ like UK carbon price support and Sweden’s carbon tax, with revenues dedicated to green energy goals. Estimates suggest up to 30% of renewable support spending across EU nations between 2008-2015 was financed through carbon pricing revenues. So in several ways, the design and operation of the EU ETS provides dedicated support for scaling up renewable electricity.

The emissions trading mechanism of the EU ETS has played a significant role in driving renewable energy deployment across the European Union over the past decade. By placing a price on carbon emissions, the EU ETS incentivizes the replacement of fossil fuels with lower-carbon alternatives like various renewable energy sources. Empirical analysis has shown over 40% of new renewable capacity installed since Phase 2 can be attributed to this effect. The displacement of fossil fuel use by renewables supported by the ETS also amplifies its emission reduction impact. While a stable and high enough carbon price is critical, features within the EU ETS that support renewable energy further increase its positive impact on deployment of clean energy alternatives across Europe’s power sector.


Emissions trading systems, while an important policy tool for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, do face notable challenges in their design and implementation. Setting up an effective cap-and-trade program involves complex technical, economic and political considerations.

One major challenge is setting the appropriate cap or emission limit. The cap must be ambitious enough to drive meaningful reductions over time, but not so stringent that it drastically disrupts economic activity. Determining the appropriate pace and scale of future caps that balance environmental goals with socioeconomic impacts is difficult. Political pressures often result in caps that are too lax, weakening the system’s effectiveness. Uniform caps also ignore differences in industry circumstances.

Monitoring and enforcement of the cap present technical difficulties as well. Authorities must be able to accurately track covered emissions across many dispersed sources. Emission sources have incentives to under-report, while inaccurate data undermines the integrity of the system. New and less standardized sources like transport present unique measurement challenges. Third party verification is important but adds to costs and complexity.

A related challenge is allocating the limited emissions allowances in a fair, consistent and transparent manner. Free allocation to industrial stakeholders protects them from carbon costs but rewards the status quo. Auctioning allowances raises money but industry resists additional costs. Political influences in the allocation process have weakened the effectiveness and credibility of some programs. Harmonizing allocation across jurisdictions is also difficult when their circumstances differ.

Ensuring sufficient liquidity and a continual trading market for allowances is another challenge. Volatile carbon prices, driven more by short-term economic influences than long-term decarbonization signals, undermine incentives for low-carbon investments. Banking provisions and reserve allowance pools can help smooth prices but require careful design. Linked trading with other systems expands market depth but regulatory differences complicate linkage.

A lack of predictable, long-term carbon pricing signals is a significant disincentive for businesses considering billion-dollar infrastructure investments with decades-long lifespans. Frequent changes in program rules erode certainty. Corporations also face split incentives between carbon costs imposed today versus long-term competitive advantages from low-carbon strategies. Governments struggle to balance environmental ambition with stable, investment-grade policies.

Emissions trading success also depends on complementary policies that address policy lacunae, market failures or non-price barriers. Regulations, performance standards, subsidies and public research can directly enable low-carbon options not driven solely by carbon costs. An overreliance on additional policies risks undermining the market signals from carbon pricing. Coordinating a policy mix is challenging.

Distributional impacts of higher carbon costs, whether through direct energy price increases or higher consumer prices, pose difficult political-economic tradeoffs. Low-income households are disproportionately affected unless cost measures like rebates are introduced, adding to the policy complexity. More comprehensive mitigation strategies are needed to ensure a just transition.

International cooperation to link trading systems or equalize carbon footprints also presents obstacles. Sovereign nations understandably prioritize domestic interests, and differences in social priorities, economic structures and political contexts complicate harmonization. Geopolitical dynamics have led some countries to delay or abandon emissions trading proposals.

While emissions trading holds promise as a flexible, market-based tool for driving emissions reductions, the design and implementation challenges are not to be underestimated. Success requires ongoing technical refinement, and navigating inevitable political tensions and socioeconomic impacts is a long-term process. Integrated mitigation strategies and global cooperation will be crucial to overcoming these challenges and realizing emissions trading’s full potential over time.