Tag Archives: when

WHAT ARE SOME CHALLENGES THAT ORGANIZATIONS MAY FACE WHEN IMPLEMENTING AI AND MACHINE LEARNING IN THEIR SUPPLY CHAIN

Lack of Data: One of the biggest challenges is a lack of high-quality, labeled data needed to train machine learning models. Supply chain data can come from many disparate sources like ERP systems, transportation APIs, IoT sensors etc. Integration and normalization of this multi-structured data is a significant effort. The data also needs to be cleaned, pre-processed and labeled to make it suitable for modeling. This data engineering work requires skills that many organizations lack.

Model Interpretability: Most machine learning models like deep neural networks are considered “black boxes” since it is difficult to explain their inner working and predictions. This lack of interpretability makes it challenging to use such models for mission-critical supply chain decisions that require explainability and auditability. Organizations need to use techniques like model inspection, SIM explanations to gain useful insights from opaque models.

Integration with Legacy Systems: Supply chain IT infrastructure in most organizations consists of legacy ERP/TMS systems that have been in use for decades. Integrating new AI/ML capabilities with these existing systems in a seamless manner requires careful planning and deployment strategies. Issues range from data/API compatibility to ensuring continuous and reliable model execution within legacy processes and workflows. Organizations need to invest in modernization efforts and plan integrations judiciously.

Technology Debt: Implementing any new technology comes with technical debt as prototypes are built, capabilities are added iteratively and systems evolve over time. With AI/ML with its fast pace of innovation, technology debt issues like outdated models, code, and infrastructure become important to manage proactively. Without due diligence, debt can lead to deteriorating performance, bugs and security vulnerabilities down the line. Organizations need to adopt best practices like continuous integration/delivery to manage this evolving technology landscape.

Talent Shortage: AI and supply chain talent with cross-functional skills are in short supply industry-wide. Building high-performing AI/ML teams requires capabilities across data science, engineering, domain expertise and more. While certain roles can be outsourced, core team members with deep technical skills and business acumen are critical for long term success but difficult to hire. Organizations need strategic talent partnerships and training programs to develop internal staff.

Regulatory Compliance: Supply chains operate in complex regulatory environments which adds extra challenges for AI. Issues range from data privacy & security to model governance, explainability for audits and non-discrimination in outputs. Frameworks like GDPR guidelines on ML require thorough due diligence. Adoption also needs to consider domain-specific regulations for industries like pharma, manufacturing etc. Regulatory knowledge gaps can delay projects or even result in non-compliance penalties.

Change Management: Implementing emerging technologies with potential for business model change and job displacements requires proactive change management. Issues range from guiding user adoption, reskilling workforce to addressing potential job displacement responsibly. Change fatigue from repeated large-scale digital transformations also needs consideration. Strong change leadership, communication and talent strategies are important for successful transformation while mitigating operational/social disruptions.

Cost of Experimentation: Building complex AI/ML supply chain applications often requires extensive experimentation with different model architectures, features, algorithms, etc. to get optimal solutions. This exploratory work has significant associated costs in terms of infrastructure spend, data processing resources, talent effort etc. Budgeting adequately for an experimental phase and establishing governance around cost controls is important. Return on investment also needs to consider tangible vs intangible benefits to justify spends.

While AI/ML offers immense opportunities to transform supply chains, their successful implementation requires diligent planning and long term commitment to address challenges across data, technology, talent, change management and regulatory compliance dimensions. Adopting best practices, piloting judiciously, establishing governance processes and fostering cross-functional collaboration are critical success factors for organizations. Continuous learning based on experiments and outcomes also helps maximize value from these emerging technologies over time.

WHAT ARE SOME COMMON CHALLENGES THAT STUDENTS FACE WHEN WORKING ON GOVERNMENT CAPSTONE PROJECTS

Students pursuing degrees related to public administration, policy, or government frequently have to take on a capstone project as one of their final undergraduate or graduate degree requirements. These capstone projects aim to allow students to synthesize their academic learning by applying theories and concepts to real-world problems or scenarios. Working on such an applied project focused on the government sector can present several unique challenges for students.

One major challenge is accessing key information and data needed to thoroughly analyze an issue area and propose evidence-based solutions or recommendations. Government agencies understandably have restrictions around what internal documents and data they can share with outsiders like students. Navigating freedom of information laws and requests, privacy rules, and non-disclosure agreements to obtain useful materials can be a time-consuming bureaucratic process for students. Even when information is shareable, it may be in formats not easily accessible or usable for research purposes. Without robust data, students have to make assumptions or generalizations that weaken the analytical rigor and credibility of their capstone work.

Students also face difficulties related to directly engaging with practitioners and officials within the levels of government relevant to their project topics. Heavy workloads and limited availability hinder many public servants from dedicating significant time to guiding or advising students. Building relationships and gaining access takes strategic outreach but students have constraints on their capacity to network. Participating in meetings or directly observing agency processes is also challenging due to clearances, permissions, and scheduling. A lack of immersed understanding of real organizational dynamics and priorities detracts from the applied value of students’ recommendations.

The sometimes abstract, broad nature of policy issues and systemic problems students may choose also presents difficulties. Providing clear, tangible, and politically feasible solutions within the boundaries of an academic project can be daunting. There are rarely straightforward answers to multifaceted challenges involving multiple stakeholders with competing interests. Students have to narrow the scope of problems sufficiently to complete thorough analysis and proposed actions within strict capstone guidelines and timeframes. Yet narrowly focusing risks overlooking critical contextual factors and interdependencies.

The timelines of government and higher education do not always align which creates barriers. Students are bound by academic calendars and deadlines that may not match legislative cycles, budget planning periods, or longer-term strategic planning within the public sector. Proposing solutions or initiatives that realistically require years to implement diffuses the policy relevance and takes away from the integrated, practicum-style approach of capstone experiences. Similarly, political transitions at all levels of government during students’ work can suddenly shift priorities and appetite for certain solutions.

Securing community buy-in or organizational sponsorship for capstone projects focused on assessment, pilot programs, or demonstrations poses difficulties as well. Government agencies and non-profits have limited flexibility and resources to participate based purely on academic timelines. Without “real world” partners invested in following through after the student graduates, projects lose applied impact and capacity to drive genuine progress. This lessens the incentive for stakeholders to collaborate closely with students throughout their research.

While government-centered capstone projects help prepare students for careers in public service, they present complex navigational challenges. With proper support and realistic scoping of projects, these difficulties can certainly be mitigated. Students should enter the process understanding such applied work may not perfectly align with academic constraints or generate immediate, tangible reforms. The learning that comes through wrestling with real barriers better equips one to make thoughtful contributions within democratic governance.

WHAT ARE SOME IMPORTANT FACTORS TO CONSIDER WHEN DEVELOPING A MOBILE APPLICATION FOR A CAPSTONE PROJECT

Platform and technology choice is a crucial early consideration. You need to determine if your app will be developed for iOS, Android, or both platforms. This has implications for things like codebases, developer tools and SDKs used, and also audience reach. Research which platform(s) make the most sense based on your intended users.

Within each platform, you need to choose a programming language and frameworks. For iOS, this typically means Swift or Objective-C using Xcode and Cocoa Touch. For Android, this usually means Java or Kotlin using Android Studio and its SDK. Flutter is a newer cross-platform option too. Technology choices affect development speed and capabilities.

User experience and interface design are extremely important, especially for a mobile app. Users expect a smooth, intuitive UX tailored for small screens. Wireframing, mockups, and prototyping early on will help validate and refine your design concepts. Consider gestural navigation, screen real estate usage, data input methods, and more. Get feedback and iterate on the UX.

Plan your app’s feature set and functionality carefully. Determine the key experiences and flows users will need based on research. Prioritize features based on importance and what can reasonably be delivered within project timelines. Consider how different features integrate and work together seamlessly. Whiteboard workflows, stories, and flows in detail.

Data architecture and storage is another major design aspect. Think through what data needs to be stored, where, and how to structure it. Options include SQLite, Core Data, Realtime Databases like Firebase, cloud services. Determine whether data is local, synced, shared amongst users, accessed publicly or privately and apply the right solutions.

Security and privacy are also important mobile app considerations especially with sensitive user data. Features like authentication, authorization, data encryption, input validation become essential. Adhere to security best practices and comply with regulations like GDPR depending on your users and functionality.

Determine key metrics to track success post-launch. This could include things like downloads, active users, retention, feature engagement, support requests, revenue. Integrate analytics SDKs early like Firebase Analytics. Establish baseline goals and KPIs to measure against over time to guide future development.

Build for quality by following best practices for debugging, testing, releases and continuous integration/delivery. Leverage tools for thorough automated and manual testing across devices/emulators. Address bugs and crashes proactively to ensure high reliability, performance and stability. Test user flows rigorously from beginning to end.

Consider visual elements like icons, splash screens and app store assets. These represent your brand and should be professionally designed. High quality visuals create a better first impression and download conversion. Photos, images and other multimedia content may also be needed.

Monetization strategies if any need forethought. Options include premium features/subscriptions, in-app purchases, advertising. Monetization requires integrating payment processors and ad networks which demands additional consideration of data usage policies and user experience impact.

Maintenance and long term sustainability planning are just as important after launch. Routine bug fixing, feature updates, server management may be needed ongoing. Determine resource requirements and explore monetization options to keep funding future development. Nurture an engaged user community through forums, social media and other touchpoints. Consider an roadmap with a longer term product vision.

Thorough project documentation maintained throughout the process will prove invaluable for future students, users and other stakeholders. Clearly track goals, design decisions made with justifications, lessons learned – both technical and experiential. Comprehensive documentation showcases your work and serves as a learning asset for others.

Those cover some of the major factors that need attention when developing a polished, well-engineered mobile application for a capstone project that satisfies requirements and demonstrates skill mastery. A thoughtful consideration of objectives, technical implementation, user experience, business aspects, quality measures and documentation will empower success.

WHAT ARE SOME COMMON CHALLENGES THAT STUDENTS FACE WHEN MANAGING A CAPSTONE PROJECT

One of the biggest challenges students face is project planning and time management. Capstone projects require a significant time commitment, often spanning an entire semester or longer. Students must plan out their projects carefully to make the most effective use of their time. This requires estimating how long each task will take, setting deadlines, and sticking to a schedule. Students often struggle with overcommitting themselves early on and not leaving enough time for revisions, unforeseen delays, or unexpected challenges that arise. Proper planning and scheduling buffers is critical but can be difficult for students to learn to do well.

Related to planning is organization. Large projects involve tracking many moving parts like research, scheduling interviews or data collection, analyzing results, writing reports, and more. Students have to find effective ways to organize files, tasks, research notes, and all other project components. This requires skills like record keeping, folder structures, to-do lists, and documentation practices. Without good organization, projects can easily become scattered and disorganized. This leads to wasted time searching for materials and makes staying on track more difficult.

Scope is another common challenge. It can be tempting for ambitious students to take on overly broad or complex project scopes that are not realistically achievable given the time constraints. Narrowing a scope to only what can reasonably be accomplished is important but novice students still struggle with correctly defining the right scope. Scope creep, where the true amount of work expands beyond what was planned, is also risky without experience. Effective scoping requires knowing what level of depth, variables, outcomes, etc. are possible to reasonably include.

Research challenges can also arise. For some projects, students have to find appropriate literature sources, techniques, datasets, subjects, and more to use in their work. This requires strong research skills to track down quality information efficiently. Students may struggle finding viable options, assessing source credibility, dealing with information overload, gaining access to proprietary materials, or recruiting people to participate in their research. Without research experience, these can slow progress.

Another issue relates to analysis and unknowns. When analyzing results, students sometimes encounter unexpected findings, limitations in their data, inaccuracies in measurements, needing additional iterations or trials, or simply not knowing the best analytic approach. Handling unknowns, deviations from plans, and unforeseen barriers takes experience. Novice students tend to underestimate the potential for surprises and challenges during execution and analysis phases.

Writing large academic reports also presents difficulties. Many students struggle with the length, structure, format, integration of various components, citations, and overall quality of voice expected in a major paper or thesis. Effective scientific writing skills take practice to develop. Meeting high standards for academic work can be stressful.

Additionally, independent work styles are a change from typical coursework. Students have to be self-motivated to keep progressing without firm deadlines or class meetings driving their work. Working independently requires self-discipline that some struggle to establish on a large project. It can also be more difficult to ask for help from mentors compared to traditional classroom settings.

Capstone projects often involve presenting research to audiences. Creating high-quality presentations, practicing public speaking skills, fielding technical questions, and engaging with professionals takes confidence. Presenting one’s own work can induce anxiety, especially for students without extensive presentation experience. Handling questioning and critique from others poses an added challenge.

Effective project management, research skills, analysis abilities, scientific writing, independent work habits, and presentation experience are not instinctual for many students undertaking their first major independent works. While rewarding, capstone projects absolutely present considerable challenges that require students to stretch beyond their current skill levels. With guidance, most overcome these obstacles and gain extremely valuable experience in the process. Proper supports help smooth out the numerous potential roadblocks students may face during large-scale independent work.

WHAT ARE SOME POTENTIAL CHALLENGES THAT MAY ARISE WHEN IMPLEMENTING SUSTAINABLE PASTURE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES

One of the key challenges is changing farmer mindsets and behaviors. Most farmers have been practicing conventional intensive grazing methods for generations and it can be difficult to convince them to change established practices and adopt more sustainable approaches. Transitioning to rotational or mob grazing requires a change in how they think about managing livestock and pastures. It demands more active management with fencing, water distribution, and frequent pasture rotations. This level of intensive management represents a significant change from typical extensive grazing systems and many farmers are hesitant or resistant to the additional work required at first. Extensive education and demonstration programs are needed to show farmers the long term production, economic, and environmental benefits of sustainable grazing.

Another challenge is the upfront infrastructure investment required for successful rotational or mob grazing. Fencing off smaller paddocks and setting up a reliable water distribution system is a substantial cost, especially for larger acreage operations. Portable fencing and water lines/troughs are necessary equipment that farms may not already have. Finding the capital to invest in these infrastructure upgrades can be difficult. Grant, loan, and cost-share programs may help but may not cover all expenses. The payback period for return on this investment through increased forage utilization and animal performance needs to be clearly demonstrated.

Land topography and layout can also pose challenges. Not all farms have land perfectly situated into easily fenced and accessed small paddocks. Features like hills, valleys, rocky areas, or scattered woodlots may complicate subdivision of large pastures. Lane ways and water line placements require planning and may not always provide ideal rotation pathways. Small odd-shaped areas not suitable for grazing may be left after fencing. Topography influences how pastures can be most efficiently subdivided.

Weed and invasive plant control can also be more difficult with intensive rotational grazing systems compared to traditional extensive grazing. Higher stocking densities and shorter grazing periods provide less grazing pressure on undesirable species which are then able to spread more readily. Close monitoring is needed to spot and treat new weed infestations before they proliferate. Herbicide use may need to increase which some farmers prefer to avoid. Maintaining correct timing, density and duration of grazing rotations is key to managing weeds naturally through grazing management.

Matching forage growth rates to the timing of grazing animal introductions and removals also requires precision management. With frequent rotations, pastures need time to fully recover between grazings which is dependent on local growing conditions and species. Too short an interval risks overgrazing while too long allows for wasted regrowth. Grazing during wet or drought periods can further complicate this synchronization. Experience and attentive planning over several seasons is usually needed to work out an ideal grazing schedule tailored to each farm’s conditions and resources.

Successful transition also demands an ongoing commitment to monitoring and adaptive management. No grazing system will remain static as livestock needs, markets, weather and forage conditions vary annually. Flexibility is important to adjust rotations, paddock sizes, stocking rates and other practices as warranted. Close tracking of forage response, animal performance, pasture health, weed pressures and other factors helps to continually refine management over time to optimize outcomes. This level of monitoring represents a sustained change from more “set and forget” extensive grazing methods of the past. The learning process for the farmer never truly ends.

While sustainable grazing techniques offer tremendous environmental, economic and livestock health benefits over the long term, their implementation does represent a significant change from traditional practices and pose real challenges. Overcoming farmer resistance to change, investing in infrastructure, adapting to landscape limitations, achieving the proper balance of grazing/rest periods, and committing to evolvive adaptive management all test the farmer. Careful planning, education, technical support, cost assistance and demonstrated benefits are key to helping overcome obstacles to transitioning to more ecological grazing systems. With persistence through the learning process, improved outcomes are very achievable.