Author Archives: Steven Okelley

BEYER CRITICAL THINKING MODEL

Leave a reply

The Beyer Critical Thinking Model was developed by Barry Beyer and provides a framework for developing and applying critical thinking skills. This model breaks down the critical thinking process into distinct phases that can be directly taught and practiced. According to Beyer, critical thinking involves asking meaningful questions, using concepts, gathering and assessing relevant information, coming to well-reasoned conclusions, solving problems creatively, and making careful decisions.

The first step in the Beyer model is Establishing Purpose. When approaching a new problem or situation, it is important to begin by clearly articulating the overall goal or purpose. What is the issue being examined? Why is it important to think critically about this issue? What kind of decision needs to be made or what problem needs to be solved? Having a clear sense of purpose helps guide the rest of the critical thinking process.

The second step is Questioning. Beyer emphasizes that strong critical thinkers ask good questions. Not just any questions will do – the types of questions asked need to match the established purpose and move the thinking process forward in a meaningful way. Effectively questioning involves activities like identifying assumptions, points of view, reasons and claims, alternatives, implications and consequences. Questions also need to be open-minded and aimed at exploring all aspects of the issue.

The third step is Using Concepts. According to Beyer, critical thinking relies on the use of concepts to examine and analyze issues and draw connections. Relevant concepts help create useful categories for understanding new information and different perspectives. Examples of concepts that may apply include perspective, interpretation, assumption, implication, point of view, reliability, causation and credibility. Identifying and precisely defining the appropriate concepts is an important part of examining any problem or situation critically.

Gathering and Assessing Relevant Information comes next. Strong critical thinkers identify and obtain high quality information from reliable sources related to the issue or problem. But information alone is not enough – it needs to be carefully assessed. Assessment involves activities like checking source credibility, identifying bias, evaluating the strength of evidence, connecting the evidence back to the purpose and initial questions, and identifying gaps or weaknesses. Stereotypes or generalizations should also be questioned.

Step five is Drawing Reasoned Conclusions. Now that purpose has been established, good questions asked, appropriate concepts identified and relevant information gathered and assessed – conclusions about the issue can be inferred. Conclusions need to logically flow from the assessment of information gathered and directly address the established purpose. Inductive and deductive reasoning are both important in order to draw justifiable, open-minded, non-arbitrary conclusions.

The sixth step is Presenting Results. Once critical thinking has occurred, results need to be presented to others. Strong critical thinkers can present their logical reasoning and conclusions in an organized manner. Visuals, clear examples and explanations of key points help convey overall understanding. Presentations also allow for feedback, additional questioning and confirmation that the conclusions are warranted based on the evidence and do in fact address the original purpose and scope of the critical thinking.

The final step is the Continuous Re-Evaluation and Improvement phase. Critical thinking is an ongoing process that does not end with the presentation of conclusions. Ideas, theories and situations are constantly changing, so strong critical thinkers keep an open mind and are willing to reconsider prior reasoning based on new evidence or insights. They also aim to strengthen their critical thinking abilities further with each application of the model. Beyer’s model provides a framework that can be deliberately practiced to develop better critical thinkers.

The Beyer Critical Thinking Model outlines seven distinct steps – Establishing Purpose, Questioning, Using Concepts, Gathering and Assessing Information, Drawing Reasoned Conclusions, Presenting Results, and Continuous Re-Evaluation and Improvement. If utilized effectively, this comprehensive model can significantly enhance one’s ability to think critically by promoting careful analysis and evaluation of complex issues, problems and decisions. The emphasis on active and open-minded questioning, use of relevant evidence, logical inference, and ongoing refinement makes this a very useful tool for developing superior critical reasoning skills. Its systematic approach also facilitates the teaching of critical thinking to others across different subject areas and contexts.

7.1 CRITICAL THINKING CHALLENGE WORKING WITH MEDIA FILES

Leave a reply

You raise an interesting point about the complexities involved in working with media files. Here is a lengthy, detailed response to consider:

There are many factors to address when taking on any media-based project that requires collecting, organizing, and utilizing different file types. First and foremost, it is crucial to have a clear understanding of the goals and intended outcomes of the project to identify what file formats will best achieve those aims. The flexibility and limitations of various formats need to be evaluated against the specific distribution channels and audience platforms involved.

An initial audit of the source files that will be drawn upon is also necessary to take stock of what is available and ensure all relevant parties can access needed permissions. File types will likely span a wide range including videos, photos, audio recordings, graphics, and textual documents. Their current storage locations, file names or other identifying metadata, and ownership history all bear examining. Proper file naming and organizational conventions should be established upfront to maintain coherence and retrieve-ability throughout the project lifespan.

Interoperability is another prime consideration as media often needs adapting to different environments. File conversions may be unavoidable, so accepting lossy versus lossless options and how much quality degradation is acceptable versus the size and compatibility tradeoffs must be weighed. The necessary technical know-how and software licenses for conversions also factor into budget and resource planning. Establishing standardized formats for each file category lessens future compatibility surprises.

Rights management encompassing copyrights, clearances, and attribution protocols demands close review of all source material to surface any restrictions on use or modification. File provenance trails help fulfill proper crediting requirements. If third-party content will be involved, permissions must be procured in writing and tracked systematically. Rights expiry dates and renewals pose ongoing responsibilities. Freedom of Information Act or other disclosure obligations regionally could also impact project privacy and security measures.

Metadata standards and styles directly affect files’ findability down the line. Descriptive tags about content, context, dates, creators, and technical specs have immense retrieval value when applied judiciously and consistently throughout the project holdings. Automated metadata harvesting tools can expedite the process but manual verification remains crucial for precision. Periodic metadata audits and normalizations further preserve organized access over the technology lifecycles.

Even the most meticulously assembled media projects cannot be set-and-forget, as file formats, software, and infrastructure are constantly evolving. A preservation strategy outlining migration plans, refresh cycles, and backup/disaster recovery protocols guards against future obsolescence or corruption risks. Emulation and encapsulation techniques may futureproof access. The ever-growing volumes of digital content also bring the challenges of economical storage, network bandwidth, and computing power requirements as scale increases.

Although juggling various media file types adds intricacy to any initiative, diligently addressing identification, organization, description, standards, rights, and future accessibility concerns upfront can help streamline workflow while sparing headaches down the road. With thorough audit and planning tailored to specific goals, technical and policy roadblocks that often derail similar projects may be avoided. Please let me know if any part of this lengthy response requires expansion or clarification as we embark on examining this multifaceted topic further.

CAPSTONE PROJECTS INSPIRING SOLUTIONS FOR MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION CHALLENGES

Leave a reply

There are so many inspiring capstone projects that offer innovative solutions to challenges in media and communication. Students constantly impress with their ability to identify real-world issues and design thoughtful interventions. Here are just a few examples:

Many students tackle the problem of misinformation online and propose new tools for verifying facts. One group built a browser extension that checks claims on social media against databases of fact-checked information. It tags posts with warnings if they contain untruths. Another developed an AI assistant able to discuss any topic and clearly distinguish verifiable facts from opinions or impossible claims. Projects like these could help curb the spread of falsehoods that mislead the public and undermine public discourse.

Accessibility is another area rife with opportunity for clever solutions. One senior designed an augmented reality app allowing deaf users to attend live events or lectures while seeing captions overlaid on speakers in real-time. Computer vision recognizes who is talking andPulls transcripts from a database. Elsewhere, a student invented a browser plugin replacing CAPTCHAs With audio descriptions of images to Verify humans for websites in a manner accessible to the blind. Such thoughtful ideas make the web and real-world experiences more inclusive for those with disabilities.

Localized communication breakdowns also provided inspiration. In areas hit by natural disasters, power outages can cut communities off from emergency alerts and aid coordination. But one group devised a mesh network system utilizing Wi-Fi and Bluetooth between phones, allowing information to still circulate even without cell service. Separately, for isolated rural villages in developing nations, another capstone invented a voice assistant accessible through any phone that local farmers could call for real-time price comparisons, weather forecasts, and other services normally only available online. Projects like these demonstrate how technology can strengthen communities under duress.

Some seek to remedy information gaps. A student worked with tribal elders to compile their abundant traditional ecological knowledge into an interactive database with photos and audio clips. Now younger generations and students can access teachings on indigenous plant uses, seasonal cycles, and wildlife in a culturally-sensitive digital format to promote cultural preservation. Meanwhile, another capstone team built an open source archive of historical minority press articles to broaden historical understandings of marginalized groups. Their database incorporates optical character recognition to make millions of pages searchable which otherwise would have remained unseen in microfilm reels. These efforts help ensure diverse perspectives and bodies of knowledge do not fade from collective memories.

Journalism and media projects also abounded. Some conceived new types of interactive storytelling combining immersive virtual reality with documentary techniques. One even used thermal imaging and air quality sensors to “embed” viewers inside smog-choked streets in order to evoke the crisis of pollution. In terms of hard news tools, a GPS-enabled crisis map application allows citizen witnesses to upload firsthand accounts, photos and videos from conflict zones which editors then verify and compile into live interactive disaster maps with embedded social media feeds. Such platforms could make eyewitness reporting more reliable and accessible during emergencies when traditional networks falter.

There are too many brilliant capstone concepts to list entirely. But these diverse examples portray some of the promising new directions in leveraging technology, from mitigating misinformation and making media accessible, to archiving hidden histories or strengthening disaster communications. Time and again, students rise to the challenge of devising pragmatic yet optimistic solutions to societal problems within media and connectivity. Their fresh perspectives offer real hope that we can build a more just, inclusive and well-informed digital future for all.

WHAT IS INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM?

Leave a reply

An intrusion detection system (IDS) is a device or software application that monitors a network or systems for malicious activity or policy violations. Any malicious activities or violations are typically reported either to an administrator or collected centrally using a security information and event management (SIEM) system.

There are two main types of intrusion detection systems – network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) and host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDS). A NIDS is designed to sit on the network, usually as a separate system connected to a span or mirror port, and passively monitor all network traffic that passes through its network segments. It analyzes the network and transport layers of the network traffic to detect suspicious activity using signatures or anomaly detection methods. A HIDS is installed on individual hosts or end points like servers, workstations, firewalls etc. and monitors events occurring within those systems like access to critical files, changes to critical systems files and directories, signs of malware etc.

Some key aspects of how intrusion detection systems work:

  • Signatures/Rules/Patterns – The IDS has a database of attack signatures, rules or patterns that it uses to compare network traffic and system events against to detect known malicious behavior. The signatures are constantly updated as new threats emerge.
  • Anomaly detection – Some advanced IDS can detect anomalies or deviations from a defined baseline of normal user or system behavior. It builds up a profile of what is considered normal behavior and detect anomalies from that statistical norm. This helps catch previously unknown threats.
  • Protocol analysis – The IDS analyzes the network traffic at different protocol levels like TCP/IP, HTTP etc. to detect protocol violations, suspicious traffic patterns and policy violations.
  • Log file monitoring – The host-based IDS monitors system log files for events like unauthorized file access, changes to system files and processes that could indicate a compromise.
  • Packet inspection – The network IDS can inspect the actual content of packets on the network at different layers to detect payload anomalies, malware signatures, suspicious URLs, file transfers etc.
  • Real-time operation – Modern IDS work in real-time and flag any potential incidents immediately as they are detected to facilitate quick response.
  • Alerts – When the IDS detects a potential incident, it generates an alert. The alert usually contains details like source/destination IPs, protocol used, rule/signature that triggered it, time of detection etc. Alerts are sent to a central management system.
  • Incident response tools – Many IDS integrate with tools like network packet capture solutions to allow security teams to review captured network traffic associated with an alert for further analysis.

While IDS are very useful in detecting threats, they also have some limitations:

  • Generate high false positives – Due to their very sensitive nature, IDS may detect normal benign traffic as attacks incorrectly resulting in high false alarms. Too many false alerts can desensitize security teams.
  • Easily evaded – Experienced attackers know the common attack patterns and signatures monitored by IDS and are able to subtly modify their behavior or use obfuscation to evade detection.
  • No prevention – IDS are passive, only generating alerts. They cannot actively block or prevent threats on their own. Response still depends on human security teams.
  • Resource intensive – Monitoring all network and system activity continuously in real-time requires high compute and storage resources which increases infrastructure and management costs.
  • Complex to deploy and manage at scale – As networks and infrastructures grow in size, deploying, correlating alerts from and managing multiple IDS poses operational challenges. A centralized SIEM is needed.

To mitigate these limitations, modern IDS have evolved and many organizations integrate them with other preventive security controls like firewalls, web gateways and endpoint protections that can block threats. Machine learning and AI analytics are also being used to enhance anomaly detection abilities to catch novel threats. Correlation of IDS alerts with data from other systems through SIEM platforms improves accuracy and reduces false alarms.

Despite some weaknesses, intrusion detection systems continue to play a critical role in most security programs by providing continuous monitoring capabilities and acting as early warning systems for threats and policy violations. When rigorously maintained and paired with preventive controls, they can significantly strengthen an organization’s security posture.

INTRUSTION DETECTION SYSTEM

Leave a reply

An intrusion detection system (IDS) is a device or software application that monitors a network or systems for malicious activity or policy violations. Any malicious activities or violations are typically reported either to an administrator or collected centrally using a security information and event management (SIEM) system.

There are two main types of intrusion detection systems – network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) that monitor network traffic and host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDS) that monitor activities on individual hosts or devices. A NIDS is usually placed on its own network segment where it can see all traffic to and from the devices it is monitoring. This allows it to analyze traffic patterns and flag any activity that looks suspicious without potentially being compromised itself. A HIDS monitors the inbound and outbound traffic of the individual host it is installed on in order to detect malicious inbound or outbound traffic or unauthorized changes to files and systems.

Some key things that modern IDS try to detect include:

  • Viruses, worms, trojans – By analyzing patterns of traffic and comparing them to known malicious traffic signatures. Over time an IDS can build up a picture of what normal traffic looks like vs anomalous or malicious traffic.
  • Brute force attacks – Detecting repeated failed login attempts that might indicate a brute force password cracking attack.
  • Denial of service attacks – Detecting traffic patterns that might be associated with a DoS or DDoS attack such as very high volumes of identical packets.
  • Protocol analyses anomaly – Flagging up traffic that doesn’t conform to normal protocol behaviors such as abnormal packet sizes or sequences.
  • Policy violations – Detecting activity that violates an organization’s security policy around things like banned web categories, file transfers etc. Policy is usually predefined based on the organization’s needs.
  • Unusual system changes – Watching for changes to critical system files and configs on a host that weren’t authorized or scheduled. Could indicate a successful infection or intrusion.
  • Unauthorized wireless networks – Finding rogue wireless access points in the organization’s airspace.
  • Malformed packets – Detecting packets that don’t conform to normal protocol standards.

There are a few different approaches IDS can take to detecting threats:

  • Signature-based detection – This works by comparing patterns of traffic against a database of known malicious signatures or patterns. Only works for already known threats but very accurate. Prone to evasion by novel or polymorphic threats.
  • Anomaly-based detection – Tries to build a baseline of normal network behavior and flags deviations from that baseline as potential threats. Can detect unknown threats but prone to false alarms without very large training datasets. Needs machine learning capabilities.
  • Behavioral-based detection – Looks for abnormal sequences of events rather than just single patterns. Can provide more context around multi-stage attacks and evasions but harder to implement than signature or anomaly detection.
  • Stateful protocol analysis – Analyzes sequences of network conversations or traffic and checks they conform to understood state models for given protocols. Can detect protocol manipulation or abnormal traffic.

When an IDS detects potential malicious behavior, it will usually generate some kind of alert. Basic IDS may just log alerts but more advanced ones can automatically take action like blocking traffic from certain sources. IDS alerts still need to be analyzed by a response team to determine if they are genuine threats requiring incident response or just false positives.

As more and more security tools are deployed in an organization’s environment, it becomes important for an IDS to integrate and share information with tools like firewalls, authentication systems, antivirus etc. This is known as security information and event management (SIEM). A SIEM acts as a central console that collects logs, events and alerts from all security systems. It then uses correlation engines and security analytics to identify patterns across multiple tools to detect threats the individual tools may have missed on their own.

Some key challenges for intrusion detection include:

  • Evasion techniques – Things like encryption, obfuscation, slow attacks or stepping stone attacks can potentially evade detection by IDS signatures. Requires machine learning to recognize malicious patterns under transformation.
  • Sheer network volume – As network and cloud environments grow increasingly large-scale, analyzing and making sense of vast traffic volumes in real-time challenges traditional IDS deployments. Requires big data and ML techniques.
  • Accuracy of anomaly detection – Building robust baselines of “normal” and detecting true anomalies vs false alarms at large scale remains an open challenge, likely requiring unsupervised or self-supervised ML.
  • Integration with endpoint/network tools – Ensuring IDS can analyze a unified set of logs, events across all security layers and correlate findings for a true detection capability beyond any individual tool.
  • Response automation – Ensuring IDS detections can automatically trigger appropriate defensive responses or integration with SOAR platforms for full incident response workflows without human analysts.
  • Evolving threats – Staying ahead of adversary techniques demands continuous ML model updates, ideally without disrupting production systems, to recognize novel pattern-of-life changes.

While intrusion detection has its challenges, it remains a core component of modern security operations. With the adoption of advanced machine learning and big data techniques, as well as tight integration into broader security information platforms, IDS continues evolving to take security monitoring to new scales. Its role in early threat detection, security intelligence and incident response automation will likely grow even more important going forward.