Tag Archives: communication


When attendees register for an event on the event management platform, their registration data is stored securely in the platform’s database. This database contains tables with information on attendees, their registration details, payment info if applicable, and any additional data captured through the registration forms.

The event organizers setting up the event on the platform are given a user account that allows them to log into the administration interface for their event space. In this interface, there are several reporting and dashboard features that surface key registration metrics and allow drilling down into attendee data.

Some of the main areas event organizers can access registered attendee data are:

Registration Reports – Detailed reports can be generated that list out all registered attendees with their relevant profile fields like name, email, company, job title etc. These reports also indicate their registration status, any tickets/seats purchased, and payment status. Organizers can view, print or export these reports in Excel/CSV formats for easy communication needs.

Attendee Directory – A searchable attendee directory allows organizers to look up individual attendees by name or other fields and view their full profile. This acts as a centralized contact database of all registered delegates. Some platforms also allow basic messaging features within the directory.

Custom Fields & Metadata – If organizers have added any custom fields to the registration form, the values entered by attendees for those fields are also accessible in reports and profiles. This could include fields like dietary requirements, interests, attendee types etc.

Name Badge Templates – Name badge designs can be created/edited by organizers in the admin side. When printing name badges close to the event date, attendee data like name, organization automatically populates onto the template for printing.

Mailing Lists – The platform allows creating segmented mailing lists of attendees using dynamic criteria like source they registered from, their location, package purchased etc. These lists can then be used to send targeted emails.

Event/Session Attendees – If tracking session/activity registrations, organizers can see which registered attendees have signed up for specific sessions, events, activities planned.

Contact Syncing – Many platforms allow syncing the attendee data with the organizers’ external CRM/mailing list so it’s available across channels for follow up. Data like names, profile details, session sign ups is synced in real time.

Reporting APIs – Advanced users can access the attendee data through APIs and pull reports, contacts in formats like CSV to import into their own databases for more flexible use. Dynamic API filters allow pulling subsets of data.

Dashboard Insights – Interactive dashboards on the admin interface provide organizers with key registration metrics over time like number of registrations, countries represented, most popular sessions selected etc. at an event level.

The event registration data accessibility allows organizers to effectively manage communication with attendees before, during and after the event through proper channels. For example, organizers can:

Send pre-event promotional emails about the agenda, speakers etc to drive onsite engagement

Provide tips/instructions about logistics, travel in a pre-arrival guide

Announce schedule changes, special activities through onsite messaging apps

Conduct post-event surveys to understand attendee experience and gather feedback

Share event recaps, photos, stories with those who couldn’t make it

Promote or thank sponsors through targeted mailings to attendees

Nurture leads by sharing related content, invites to future events

Thank all attendees for participation with a short checklist email post event

Analyze registration and sales insights to plan future events better

So By having access to centralized and well-organized attendee data on the event management platform, organizers can devise integrated multichannel communication strategies to maximise value for all event stakeholders before, during and after the live event. This data access ensures smooth planning and execution of the event as well as effective engagement with attendees across various touchpoints of their journey.


Communication capstone projects are culminating assignments that allow students to demonstrate their mastery of communication concepts and skills learned throughout their degree program. Given their significance, these projects are usually rigorously evaluated using detailed rubrics that assess students’ work across multiple dimensions.

Most communication programs aim for their capstone projects to mirror real-world communication challenges and scenarios that graduates may encounter in their careers. Projects are generally evaluated based on how professionally and comprehensively they address an authentic communication problem or opportunity. Capstone work is usually judged as much on the process used to complete the project as the final deliverables or end product.

Common rubric categories used to grade communication capstones include:

Issue/Problem Identification: Rubrics assess whether students clearly defined the key communication challenge/issue and properly scoped the project’s focus and goals. Did they fully understand the relevant context and stakeholder needs?

Research & Background: Rubrics evaluate the depth and rigor of background research students conducted to understand the issue from different perspectives. Did they find and synthesize relevant literature, data, stakeholder insights and best practices to inform their approach?

Strategy & Planning: Rubrics appraise the strategic thinking and project management skills used. Did students propose a coherent strategy/plan and show an organized, deadline-driven process to complete all necessary project elements?

Creative & Critical Thinking: Creativity, innovative approaches and critical analysis are often scored. Did students offer fresh, inventive solutions and provide a thoughtful critique of various options rather than just descriptive reporting?

Stakeholder Engagement: Authentic stakeholder input elevates capstones. Rubrics judge did students meaningfully engage important stakeholders to gain feedback, buy-in and support throughout the process versus just informing at the end?

Communication Skills: Both written and oral communication deliverables (e.g. reports, presentations) receive detailed assessment. Are the deliverables compelling, well-structured and free of errors – conveying key insights in a clear, concise yet comprehensive manner?

Ethical Considerations: Rubrics examine whether students considered potential ethical implications and incorporated protocols/safeguards to ensure their project complied with organizational/industry standards of conduct.

Practical Application: The feasibility and implementability of recommendations/solutions factored into grades. Could the proposed work realistically solve the targeted issue based on given parameters and constraints if deployed?

Reflection: Self-assessment of learning is commonly included. Did students critically reflect on their capstone experience and what they learned about their own communication abilities, strengths to leverage and areas for continued growth?

Individual communication programs may add or modify rubric dimensions slightly depending on their specific focus areas or project requirements. Criteria tend to comprehensively evaluate all facets of successful professional communication work, from issue scoping to research to stakeholder engagement and application of technical/soft skills.

Capstone grades usually factor in a mix of qualitative assessments from both an advisor and sometimes external reviewers/stakeholders as well as more quantitative scores from structured rubrics. Feedback aims to help students understand their competency strengths and weaknesses to continue honing communication expertise. The capstone’s culmination of learned skills in an intensive, real-world simulation sets a strong foundation for graduates to start their careers. Programs take grading seriously as it substantiates the level of competency their degrees impart in students.

Communication capstone projects are rigorously evaluated using detailed rubrics that assess key dimensions central to professional communication work like issue identification, research, strategy, stakeholder engagement, communication abilities, ethical conduct, critical thinking, creativity and practical application. Both qualitative commentary and quantitative scoring typically factor into holistic grades aiming to demonstrate students’ mastery and validate academic programs.


Nurses play a vital role in effective communication with patients, family members, doctors, and other healthcare professionals. There are several potential barriers that can interfere with clear communication in nursing. Some of the most common barriers include:

Noise – Healthcare environments like hospitals are often loud places with beeping monitors, frequent announcements over loudspeakers, and many conversations happening simultaneously. This type of noise makes it difficult to hear others clearly and interrupts focus. Patients may have a hard time hearing nurses or asking questions.

Time constraints – Nursing is a busy profession with high patient loads and tight schedules. Nurses may feel rushed to complete tasks and move on to the next patient. Taking the time for thorough, uninterrupted communication can be challenging. Patients may feel like the nurse does not have time to listen to all their concerns.

Medical jargon – Nursing often involves using complex medical terminology that patients and families may not understand. Using words, abbreviations, or complex explanations that are above a patient’s level of comprehension creates a significant communication barrier. Patients will not understand details about their care, tests, procedures or conditions if explanations are not tailored appropriately.

Cultural and language differences – For patients whose first language or cultural background differs from the nurse’s, communicating effectively is much more difficult. There may be language barriers, different communication styles, varying interpretations of concepts like health and illness, or low health literacy. Nurses must be sensitive to these differences and adapt communication strategies accordingly.

Bias and perceptions – Unconscious bias based on attributes like gender, age, race, economic status or appearance can negatively influence communication. Nurses may make inaccurate assumptions about patients or have different perceptions of what is being communicated. This hinders truly understanding the patient’s perspective, needs and questions.

Emotional factors – Stress, fears, anxiety and other strong emotions felt by patients, family or even nurses themselves can interfere with clear reciprocal communication. When any party is upset, attention spans decrease and messages become distorted or misunderstood. Establishing rapport and trust is key for overcoming this barrier.

Environmental distractions – Privacy, auditory distractions and frequent disruptions all take away from focused listening and conveying of information between nurses and patients. With numerous people in a patient’s room or people passing by in the hall, confidential discussions are difficult. Finding a quiet, private space is important.

Electronic devices – While technology facilitates aspects of care, it can also be a barrier if not used properly. Nurses carrying multiple devices, viewing screens during conversations, incomplete documentation all detract from meaningful communication with the patient. Device-free time is needed to connect.

Staffing issues – High nurse workload, frequent changes in nursing staff, lack of continuity of care providers, mandatory overtime and burnout negatively impact communication abilities. Nurses struggle to form meaningful relationships and invest quality time with each patient under such stressful conditions. Continuity is key for effective nurse-patient dialog.

Lack of training – Communication is a complex skill that requires ongoing education and practice to master effectively across diverse populations. Nursing programs may not adequately prepare students in therapeutic communication strategies. Without proper training, inherent biases and ineffective habits persist. Additional training opportunities should be provided.

These represent many of the systemic and situational barriers nurses regularly face in establishing clear, empathetic communication with patients, families and other members of the healthcare team. Overcoming barriers requires awareness, adaptability, priority on uninterrupted time and sensitivity to individual needs and circumstances. With a focus on truly understanding each unique patient perspective, barriers can be minimized to enhance patient outcomes and experience of care. Continuous quality improvement efforts should center on effective communication strategies.


There are so many inspiring capstone projects that offer innovative solutions to challenges in media and communication. Students constantly impress with their ability to identify real-world issues and design thoughtful interventions. Here are just a few examples:

Many students tackle the problem of misinformation online and propose new tools for verifying facts. One group built a browser extension that checks claims on social media against databases of fact-checked information. It tags posts with warnings if they contain untruths. Another developed an AI assistant able to discuss any topic and clearly distinguish verifiable facts from opinions or impossible claims. Projects like these could help curb the spread of falsehoods that mislead the public and undermine public discourse.

Accessibility is another area rife with opportunity for clever solutions. One senior designed an augmented reality app allowing deaf users to attend live events or lectures while seeing captions overlaid on speakers in real-time. Computer vision recognizes who is talking andPulls transcripts from a database. Elsewhere, a student invented a browser plugin replacing CAPTCHAs With audio descriptions of images to Verify humans for websites in a manner accessible to the blind. Such thoughtful ideas make the web and real-world experiences more inclusive for those with disabilities.

Localized communication breakdowns also provided inspiration. In areas hit by natural disasters, power outages can cut communities off from emergency alerts and aid coordination. But one group devised a mesh network system utilizing Wi-Fi and Bluetooth between phones, allowing information to still circulate even without cell service. Separately, for isolated rural villages in developing nations, another capstone invented a voice assistant accessible through any phone that local farmers could call for real-time price comparisons, weather forecasts, and other services normally only available online. Projects like these demonstrate how technology can strengthen communities under duress.

Some seek to remedy information gaps. A student worked with tribal elders to compile their abundant traditional ecological knowledge into an interactive database with photos and audio clips. Now younger generations and students can access teachings on indigenous plant uses, seasonal cycles, and wildlife in a culturally-sensitive digital format to promote cultural preservation. Meanwhile, another capstone team built an open source archive of historical minority press articles to broaden historical understandings of marginalized groups. Their database incorporates optical character recognition to make millions of pages searchable which otherwise would have remained unseen in microfilm reels. These efforts help ensure diverse perspectives and bodies of knowledge do not fade from collective memories.

Journalism and media projects also abounded. Some conceived new types of interactive storytelling combining immersive virtual reality with documentary techniques. One even used thermal imaging and air quality sensors to “embed” viewers inside smog-choked streets in order to evoke the crisis of pollution. In terms of hard news tools, a GPS-enabled crisis map application allows citizen witnesses to upload firsthand accounts, photos and videos from conflict zones which editors then verify and compile into live interactive disaster maps with embedded social media feeds. Such platforms could make eyewitness reporting more reliable and accessible during emergencies when traditional networks falter.

There are too many brilliant capstone concepts to list entirely. But these diverse examples portray some of the promising new directions in leveraging technology, from mitigating misinformation and making media accessible, to archiving hidden histories or strengthening disaster communications. Time and again, students rise to the challenge of devising pragmatic yet optimistic solutions to societal problems within media and connectivity. Their fresh perspectives offer real hope that we can build a more just, inclusive and well-informed digital future for all.