Tag Archives: will

HOW WILL THE CHATBOT HANDLE COMPLEX CONVERSATIONS AND ESCALATE TO HUMAN AGENTS IF NEEDED

Leave a reply

Modern conversational AI systems are designed to have natural conversations with humans about a wide range of topics. These systems use advanced deep learning techniques like neural networks to analyze language, maintain context, and respond in coherent, human-like ways. However, AI still has limitations compared to human intelligence and experience. Completely open-domain conversations about any topic under the sun can often lead to situations beyond an AI’s abilities.

When this happens, it is important for the AI to be able to recognize its own limitations and gracefully transfer the conversation to a human agent for further assistance. This allows the interaction to continue progressing in a seamless manner without leaving the user frustrated or without answers. It also ensures users receive an appropriate level of support that is best suited for the complexity of their inquiry or issue.

A well-designed conversational AI integrated with a live chat platform can implement several strategies to identify when a complex conversation requires escalation to a human:

Monitoring conversation context and history: As the conversation progresses, the AI tracks key details discussed, questions asked, areas explored, information provided, remaining uncertainties, and open loops. If the context grows increasingly complicated involving many interlinking topics and facts, the AI may determine a human can better navigate the conversation.

Analyzing language and response confidence levels: The AI assesses its own confidence levels in understanding the user’s messages accurately and in generating high quality, well-supported responses. Responses with very low confidence indicate the topic exceeds the AI’s capabilities. Ambiguous, vague or unrelated responses are also flags.

Tracking conversation flow and coherence: An increasingly disjointed or disjointed conversation flow where topics hop abruptly or messages do not build logically on each other is another signal more experienced human facilitation is needed. Incoherence frustrates both parties.

Escalation triggers: The AI may be programmed with specific keywords, phrases or question types that automatically trigger escalation. For example, any request involving legal/medical advice or urgent help. This ensures critical issues don’t get mishandled.

Limiting response depth: The AI only explores issues or provides information to a certain level of depth and detail before passing the conversation to an agent. This prevents it from speculating too much without adequate support.

Identifying lack of progress: If after multiple exchange cycles, the user does not receive helpful answers or the issue does not advance closer towards resolution, escalation is preferred over frustrating both sides. Humans can often think outside prescribed models.

Considering user sentiment: Analyzing the user’s language sentiment and emotional state allows detecting growing impatience, frustration, or dissatisfaction signaling the need for a human assist. Users expect personalized service.

When deciding that escalation is necessary, the AI alerts the user politely and seeks permission using language like “I apologize, but this issue seems quite complex. May I transfer you to one of our agents who can better assist? They would have more experience to discuss this in depth.” Upon agreement, the AI passes the full conversation context and history to a human agent in real-time.

At the agent end, prior conversations are visible within the live chat platform along with the escalation note from the AI. The human can pick up right where the discussion left off to provide seamless continuation of service. They acknowledge the user, thank them for their patience, and using their expertise, explore open topics, answer remaining queries and work towards issue resolution.

The knowledge gained from these escalated conversations is also fed back into improving the AI system. Key information, question patterns, contextual clues etc. are used to expand the bot’s understanding over time, reducing future needs for transfers. This closes the loop in creating increasingly self-sufficient, while safely mediated, AI-human collaboration.

Properly integrating live chat capabilities makes the escalation process both natural and seamless for users. They are handed off expertly to an agent within the same interface when required, without having to repeat information or context from the start again on a separate support channel. This preserves continuity and the feeling of interacting with a single cohesive “virtual agent”.

By thoughtfully monitoring its own understanding limits and proactively shifting complex conversations to human expertise when needed, an AI system can have intelligent, context-aware discussions with people. It ensures users consistently receive appropriate guidance that addresses their needs fully. And through the feedback loop, the bot continuously learns to handle more sophisticated interactions over time with less dependence on agent hand-offs. This forms thefoundation of productive and trustworthy AI-human collaboration.

HOW WILL THE CAPSTONE PROJECT BENEFIT THE NURSING STUDENTS INVOLVED

Leave a reply

A capstone project provides nursing students with an invaluable opportunity to effectively integrate and apply the clinical knowledge and skills they have gained throughout their nursing education. By completing a self-designed capstone project, nursing students are able to synthesize evidence-based research with real-world clinical practice to address an identified gap or need within the healthcare system. This allows students to participate in a culminating experience that strengthens their critical thinking, decision-making, and leadership abilities which are core competencies required of professional nurses.

Undertaking a capstone project allows nursing students to deepen their understanding of complex patient conditions, health systems issues, public/community health challenges, or nursing roles through an intensive study of the topic area. Students can explore the intersecting social determinants of health and health outcomes for patients, which expands their holistic view of individual, family, and population health. Conducting a thorough literature review while planning and implementing their project helps reinforce students’ information literacy and ability to evaluate existing research. This fosters a culture of continuous learning and evidence-based practice that students will carry into their nursing careers.

Working through the various stages of a capstone project from formulation of objectives, to needs assessment, implementation, and evaluation provides nursing students with tangible experience in key elements of the nursing process and quality improvement initiatives. Through their capstone, students practice clinical reasoning, critical thinking, assessment skills, and the formulation of evidence-based interventions. This hands-on application of their nursing knowledge in a self-directed project strengthens students’ confidence in their clinical judgment and ability to develop, execute, and assess plans of care. The capstone project allows students to mirror real work responsibilities and gain experience in project management, which facilitates their transition to professional roles.

Presenting their capstone projects provides nursing students with a valuable opportunity to develop their oral and written communication abilities through dissemination and defense of their work. Communicating verbally about their project through a formal presentation and responding to questions mimics interactions that occur routinely in nursing practice. Writing professional reports and scholarly papers to document their capstone initiative further enhances students’ communication competence using appropriate technical language and succinct presentation of concepts. These skills are essential for nurses to effectively share information with diverse audiences, which includes patient teaching and collaborating with members of the healthcare team.

Collaboration with clinical preceptors, mentors, instructors, patients, and other key stakeholders through the capstone process fosters nursing students’ interprofessional competence. Working alongside other professionals when available provides authentic experiences in team-based care coordination and decision-making. This helps students appreciate the valuable perspectives and skill sets that each member brings to achieve positive patient and system outcomes. The capstone project empowers nursing students to potentially publish or showcase their work, allowing them to establish professional networks which they can call upon as they launch their careers. This level of engagement and visibility in the nursing community enhances students’ transition from education to practice.

The transformational impact of completing a capstone project is multi-dimensional for nursing students. It cultivates higher-level cognitive processing and clinical reasoning through intensive study of a relevant healthcare issue. Students gain hands-on experience mirroring nursing roles and quality improvement work. Communication, leadership, project management and interprofessional collaboration abilities are strengthened. The capstone project empowers nursing students to demonstrate synthesis of essential competencies through a self-directed scholarly work. This ensures they are well-equipped for diverse nursing roles upon graduation and entry into practice. The capstone establishes a solid foundation for lifelong learning and continuous growth as a professional that delivers truly patient-centered, evidence-based nursing care.

Undertaking a capstone project as the culminating experience of a nursing program provides immense benefit to students. It allows for deep exploration of an area of interest while strengthening core nursing competencies through application. Students gain experience in nursing processes, communication, project management and interprofessional collaboration to feel confident transitioning from education to practice. The capstone remains a transformational experience that solidifies students’ competence and prepares them to confidently join the nursing workforce with a desire for continuous quality improvement and learning.

CAN YOU PROVIDE MORE DETAILS ON THE EVALUATION METRICS THAT WILL BE USED TO BENCHMARK THE MODEL’S EFFECTIVENESS

Leave a reply

Accuracy: Accuracy is one of the most common and straightforward evaluation metrics used in machine learning. It measures what percentage of predictions the model got completely right. It is calculated as the number of correct predictions made by the model divided by the total number of predictions made. Accuracy provides an overall sense of a model’s performance but has some limitations. A model could be highly accurate overall but poor at certain types of examples.

Precision: Precision measures the ability of a model to not label negative examples as positive. It is calculated as the number of true positives (TP) divided by the number of true positives plus the number of false positives (FP). A high precision means that when the model predicts an example as positive, it is truly positive. Precision is important when misclassifying a negative example as positive has serious consequences. For example, a medical test that incorrectly diagnoses a healthy person as sick.

Recall/Sensitivity: Recall measures the ability of a model to find all positive examples. It is calculated as the number of true positives (TP) divided by the number of true positives plus the number of false negatives (FN). A high recall means the model pulled most of the truly positive examples within the net. Recall is important when you want the model to find as many true positives as possible and not miss any. For example, identifying diseases from medical scans.

F1 Score: The F1 score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall. It combines both precision and recall into a single measure that balances them. F1 score reaches its best value at 1 and worst at 0. The F1 score can be interpreted as a weighted average of the precision and recall, where an F1 score reaches its best value at 1 and worst at 0. The relative contribution of precision and recall to the F1 score are equal. The F1 score is most commonly used evaluation metric when there is an imbalance between positive and negative classes.

Specificity: Specificity measures the ability of a model to correctly predict the absence of a condition (true negative rate). It is calculated as the number of true negatives (TN) divided by the number of true negatives plus the number of false positives (FP). Specificity is important in those cases where correctly identifying negatives is critical, such as disease screening. A high specificity means the model correctly identified most examples that did not have the condition as negative.

AUC ROC Curve: AUC ROC stands for Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic curve. ROC is a probability curve and AUC represents degree or measure of separability of the model. It tells how well the model can distinguish between classes. ROC is a plot of the true positive rate against the false positive rate. AUC can range between 0 and 1, with a higher score representing better performance. Unlike accuracy, AUC is a balanced measure and is unaffected by class imbalance. AUC helps visualize and compare overall performance of models across different thresholds.

Cross Validation: To properly evaluate a machine learning model, it is important to validate it using techniques like k-fold cross validation. In k-fold cross validation, the dataset is divided into k smaller sets or folds. The model is trained k times, each time using k-1 folds for training and the remaining 1 fold for validating the model. This process is repeated k times so that each of the k folds is used exactly once for validation. The k results can then be averaged to get an overall validation accuracy. This method reduces variability and helps get an insight on how the model will generalize to an independent dataset.

A/B Testing: A/B testing involves comparing two versions of a model or system and evaluating them on key metrics against real users. For example, a production model could be A/B tested against a new proposed model to see if the new model actually performs better. A/B testing on real data exactly as it will be used is an excellent way to compare models and select the better one for deployment. Metrics like conversion rate, clicks, purchases etc. can help decide which model provides the optimal user experience.

Model Explainability: For high-stake applications, it is critical that the models are explainable and auditable. We should be able to explain why a model made a particular prediction for an example. Some techniques to evaluate explainability include interpreting individual predictions using methods like LIME, SHAP, integrated gradients etc. Global model explanations using techniques like SHAP plots can help understand feature importance and model behavior. Domain experts can manually analyze the explanations to ensure predictions are made for scientifically valid reasons and not some spurious correlations. Lack of robust explanations could mean the model fails to generalize.

Testing on Blind Data: To convincingly evaluate the real effectiveness of a model, it must be rigorously tested on completely new blind data that was not used during any part of model building. This includes data selection, feature engineering, model tuning, parameter optimization etc. Only then can we say with confidence how well the model would generalize to new real world data after deployment. Testing on truly blind data helps avoid issues like overfitting to the dev/test datasets. Key metrics should match or exceed performance on the initial dev/test data to claim generalizability.

WHAT ARE SOME OF THE SPECIFIC TECHNOLOGIES THAT CAPSTONE WILL BE TESTING DURING ITS MISSION

Leave a reply

The Capstone mission is designed to test and validate new navigation technologies and a prototype spacecraft will be the first to fly Google’s experimental “cubesat sized” spacecraft design to the Moon. Testing smallsat technologies at the Moon is an important step for establishing a sustainable lunar presence.

One of the key technologies being tested is called Cislunar Autonomous Positioning System or CAPS. CAPS uses radio occultation techniques and advanced autonomous navigation to determine spacecraf location without relying on GPS or networks of tracking stations. Radio occultation works by measuring the change in frequency of radio signals from satellites as they pass behind the moon and enter the moon’s shadow. This will enable precise navigation near and on the far side of the moon without line of sight to Earth. Precise navigation data is crucial for future missions involving constellations of satellites in cislunar space and landings on the lunar surface.

Another important innovation is that Capstone will be the first spacecraft to demonstrate a halo-like orbit around the moon called a Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit or NRHO. This elliptical orbit has the potential to keep a spacecraft in the vicinity of the moon’s far side continuously with just slight orbital adjustments required due to perturbation forces. Maintaining continuous line of sight to both Earth and the entire lunar far side is a major enabler for future science activities and a sustainable human presence. Capstone will thoroughly characterize orbit stability, dynamics and radio-frequency environment to validate NRHO as a destination for Gateway and other long-term presence architectures.

The smallsat form factor and structure is a new technology area that Capstone aims to prove. At just under 25 kilograms, Capstone utilizes a 6U cubesat chassis that folds open like origami to deploy its solar panels. This incredibly small and lightweight design enables the rapid fabrication, assembly and low-cost launch afforded by the small launcher market. Testing this design for long-term operation at the moon will validate it can adequately withstand the harsh space environment and demonstrate smallsats are a viable platform for deeper space exploration.

To communicate with Earth, Capstone employs an innovative software-defined radio and multiple high gain antennas in a configuration optimized for cislunar communications. Lunar missions often rely on deep space networks with large parabolic antenna that aren’t always available for small spacecraft. Capstone aims to demonstrate robust communications is achievable using smallsat radars and aggressive coding & networking techniques over the hundreds of thousands of miles between Earth and moon.

Solar electric propulsion (SEP) is a key technology that enables the Capstone spacecraft tour of cislunar space. By employing electric ion engines powered by body-mounted solar panels, Capstone can achieve significant delta-V capability within the constraints of a small satellite form factor. Testing SEP performance and lifetime during long-duration operation to the moon provides crucial data to prove out SEP as a transfer mechanism and orbital maneuvering tool for future exploration. Characteristics like ion thruster plume interactions, propellant consumption rates and spacecraft power generation will be carefully evaluated.

Once at the moon, Capstone also aims to test new lunar landed technologies. A small tracking unit will be placed on the lunar surface by the spacecraft’s impact to gather precision navigational data during the NRHO demonstration. This “suitcase-sized” lander will evaluate communications and tracking performance from the moon’s surface to help validate technologies needed by future science landers and outposts. In addition, Capstone will characterize the new orbit’s thermal, dust, plasma and radiation environment to provide assessment of impacts on smallsat technologies.

The Capstone mission provides a critical opportunity to test and prove many innovations needed for a sustainable return to the moon through advanced navigation, communications, small spacecraft development, electric propulsion and lunar surface operations – all while demonstrating a breakthrough cislunar orbit. The flight validation of these technologies in the challenging cislunar environment is fundamentally enabling for the Artemis program’s vision of long-term exploration and commercial activities at the moon through utilization of smaller, more affordable spacecraft. The mission aims to reduce risks for future deep space smallsats and help accelerate development of powerful new capabilities to explore space.

The Capstone mission presents a unique opportunity for NASA to test many new technologies simultaneously at the moon in a pathfinding small satellite. Successful completion would significantly de-risk future exploration goals while also helping to drive adoption of advanced smallsat approaches into the mainstream of deep space operations. Together, these technology demonstrations have the potential to substantially support NASA and commercial objectives for establishing a long term infrastructure in cislunar space to enable sustained robotic and crewed human exploration to the lunar surface and beyond.

HOW WILL THE EVENT ORGANIZERS ACCESS THE REGISTERED ATTENDEE DATA FOR COMMUNICATION PURPOSES

Leave a reply

When attendees register for an event on the event management platform, their registration data is stored securely in the platform’s database. This database contains tables with information on attendees, their registration details, payment info if applicable, and any additional data captured through the registration forms.

The event organizers setting up the event on the platform are given a user account that allows them to log into the administration interface for their event space. In this interface, there are several reporting and dashboard features that surface key registration metrics and allow drilling down into attendee data.

Some of the main areas event organizers can access registered attendee data are:

Registration Reports – Detailed reports can be generated that list out all registered attendees with their relevant profile fields like name, email, company, job title etc. These reports also indicate their registration status, any tickets/seats purchased, and payment status. Organizers can view, print or export these reports in Excel/CSV formats for easy communication needs.

Attendee Directory – A searchable attendee directory allows organizers to look up individual attendees by name or other fields and view their full profile. This acts as a centralized contact database of all registered delegates. Some platforms also allow basic messaging features within the directory.

Custom Fields & Metadata – If organizers have added any custom fields to the registration form, the values entered by attendees for those fields are also accessible in reports and profiles. This could include fields like dietary requirements, interests, attendee types etc.

Name Badge Templates – Name badge designs can be created/edited by organizers in the admin side. When printing name badges close to the event date, attendee data like name, organization automatically populates onto the template for printing.

Mailing Lists – The platform allows creating segmented mailing lists of attendees using dynamic criteria like source they registered from, their location, package purchased etc. These lists can then be used to send targeted emails.

Event/Session Attendees – If tracking session/activity registrations, organizers can see which registered attendees have signed up for specific sessions, events, activities planned.

Contact Syncing – Many platforms allow syncing the attendee data with the organizers’ external CRM/mailing list so it’s available across channels for follow up. Data like names, profile details, session sign ups is synced in real time.

Reporting APIs – Advanced users can access the attendee data through APIs and pull reports, contacts in formats like CSV to import into their own databases for more flexible use. Dynamic API filters allow pulling subsets of data.

Dashboard Insights – Interactive dashboards on the admin interface provide organizers with key registration metrics over time like number of registrations, countries represented, most popular sessions selected etc. at an event level.

The event registration data accessibility allows organizers to effectively manage communication with attendees before, during and after the event through proper channels. For example, organizers can:

Send pre-event promotional emails about the agenda, speakers etc to drive onsite engagement

Provide tips/instructions about logistics, travel in a pre-arrival guide

Announce schedule changes, special activities through onsite messaging apps

Conduct post-event surveys to understand attendee experience and gather feedback

Share event recaps, photos, stories with those who couldn’t make it

Promote or thank sponsors through targeted mailings to attendees

Nurture leads by sharing related content, invites to future events

Thank all attendees for participation with a short checklist email post event

Analyze registration and sales insights to plan future events better

So By having access to centralized and well-organized attendee data on the event management platform, organizers can devise integrated multichannel communication strategies to maximise value for all event stakeholders before, during and after the live event. This data access ensures smooth planning and execution of the event as well as effective engagement with attendees across various touchpoints of their journey.