Tag Archives: affect

WHAT ARE SOME OTHER FACTORS THAT CAN AFFECT LIFE INSURANCE COSTS

Health – Your current and past health is one of the biggest determinants of life insurance rates. Insurance companies will assess your health risks based on information provided during the medical screening and application process. Things like your medical history, any pre-existing conditions, your weight, tobacco use, and participation in hazardous activities can all influence rates. Generally speaking, the healthier your lifestyle choices, the lower your rates will likely be.

Age – Life insurance premiums tend to be cheaper when purchased at a younger age. As you get older, the risks of death increase statistically each year, so rates will rise accordingly. Being older often means higher rates since there is less time left for the insurance company to earn profits from your policy before having a greater chance of paying out the death benefit.

Policy Amount – Not surprisingly, the greater the death benefit amount you request, the more expensive your premiums will tend to be. A $500,000 policy will cost significantly more than a $100,000 policy, for example, since there is more financial liability for the insurance company if they have to pay out a $500,000 death benefit.

Policy Term Length – Term life insurance, which provides coverage for a pre-determined period of time like 10-30 years, usually has lower premiums than permanent or whole life insurance that covers you for your entire life. Within these categories, longer term lengths will usually carry higher rates than shorter terms. For a 20-year term policy, a 50-year-old client will pay less than for a 30-year term, as their policy would expire before reaching an advanced older age.

Marital Status – Married people may qualify for lower rates than singles for life insurance since married individuals tend to have greater financial obligations and dependency upon their income that life insurance helps protect, like a spouse and children. Significant health or risk factor differences between spouses could diminish this benefit.

Gender – Women tend to have lower life insurance premiums than men of the same age since female mortality rates are statistically lower. This gender rating difference has narrowed in recent decades as gender life expectancies have converged some but does still affect pricing to a degree.

Occupation – Dangerous occupations that carry materially higher accident or mortality risks can lead to higher rates. Examples include certain jobs in construction, firefighting, mining, police or military work, commercial aviation, and more hands-on roles in manufacturing or industrial settings where serious workplace injuries are more prevalent. Sedentary white-collar jobs do not come with as high of an occupational risk premium.

Driving Record – A history of speeding tickets, accidents, or license suspensions from drunk/reckless driving may cause a small increase in premiums compared to clients with clean driving records. This shows a willingness to take on greater risks with safety. The impact is minor for life insurance versus larger impacts on auto insurance rates.

Income – High-income individuals may pay more for life insurance since the death benefit amounts needed to adequately replace their substantial earnings are larger and pose greater financial liability for the insurer. This can affect pricing somewhat. Health is still the primary underwriting consideration regardless of income level.

Optional Riders – Any additional benefit riders selected with a policy like chronic illness or long-term care riders can increase the premium cost above what a standard policy alone would be. These add additional coverage and risks that insurers price accordingly.

Underwriting Class – Through medical evaluations, blood tests, medical exams, and other screening tools, insurers will place applicants into standardized risk classes that significantly dictate rates. Lower-risk preferred classes have lower rates while higher-risk classes, including those with health issues that place them in a pari-mutuel or rated class, pay higher premiums commensurate with their increased risks.

State of Residence – Life insurance rates can vary somewhat between states based on regional economic indicators, state insurance regulations, and available competition among carriers in each local market. Ultra-competitive markets like California often see lower average rates than less competitive state environments. The application of certain state-specific laws may impact rates too.

Carrier Selected – Each life insurer has its own proprietary underwriting guidelines and pricing models. Two identical applications could receive different rates from various carriers based on how they each independently assess and price the associated risks. Comparing quotes across multiple top-rated insurers identifies the most competitive options.

This covers some of the important financial and health-related rating factors that life insurance companies use to develop customized premiums based on an individual applicant’s unique circumstances and risk profile. Favorable characteristics in these areas can potentially provide opportunities for lower rates and premium savings. Obtaining quotes and applying through licensed advisors helps navigate the process optimally.

HOW CAN THE TRANSITION TO ELECTRIC VEHICLES AFFECT ENERGY GENERATION AND GRID MODERNIZATION?

The widespread adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) has the potential to significantly impact the electricity generation and distribution systems due to the additional loads that charging these vehicles will place on the power grid. As more consumers switch from gasoline-powered cars to EVs, the cumulative effect of EV charging could overwhelm the grid if utilities are not prepared. This transition provides both challenges and opportunities when it comes to energy generation and modernizing electrical infrastructure.

One of the main challenges is ensuring there is sufficient generating capacity to meet the increased demand from EVs, which will likely occur in the evening as vehicle owners return home from work and school and plug in their vehicles. Utilities will need to carefully monitor electricity demand patterns and load forecasts as EV adoption increases to identify if and when new power plants may need to be built to avoid brownouts or blackouts during peak charging periods. Building new generation is a huge undertaking that requires years of planning, permitting, and construction.

Integrating more renewable energy sources like solar and wind power could help address this increased demand, but their intermittent nature presents integration challenges that will require modernizing grid technologies. More battery storage systems will likely be needed to capture and redistribute solar and wind power to align with demand cycles. This will necessitate upgrading transmission infrastructure to transport energy from remote renewable resourcerich areas to population centers. More sophisticated control systems and smart inverters can also help distribute and balance intermittent renewable energy across the grid more seamlessly with EV charging loads.

In addition to ensuring sufficient generation capacity to meet higher peak loads, utilities must prepare the distribution grid for the two-way power flows that managed charging of EVs will create. Widespread EV adoption could turn drivers’ vehicles into distributed energy resources (DERs) that supply power back to the grid during periods of oversupply from renewables. Leveraging vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology would require modernizing lower-voltage distribution systems with bidirectional supply capabilities, advanced metering infrastructure (AMI), and other control mechanisms to dispatch and distribute energy efficiently from EVs. Communications networks tying these grid edge resources together would need to be expanded as well.

The additional loads from EV charging also present opportunities for utilities to implement more sophisticated demand response and managed charging programs. These programs could be encouraged through innovative time-varying pricing tariffs and could reduce peak loads and infrastructure upgrade costs if drivers’ charging is aligned intelligently with periods of low demand and high renewable output. Coordinating charging equipment, vehicle batteries, smart appliances, distributed generation, and electric utility operations through networked smart charging stations creates major possibilities for load shaping across all sectors to better integrate high shares of renewables cost effectively.

Utilities may also benefit financially from new revenue streams created by EV adoption, such as offering charging as a service tofleets and workplaces. There is potential for utility ownership of public charging assets and billing for electricity sales at those locations. Third-party electric vehicle service equipment (EVSE) providers are entering this emerging smart charging marketplace as well. Utility investment in and coordination with these third parties will be important for modernizing distribution systems and charging infrastructure simultaneously in a way that provides reliable service.

The transition to electric vehicles presents both challenges and opportunities when it comes to power generation, grid infrastructure, utility business models, and rate structures. Prudent planning and preparation through generation capacity increases, renewable integration technologies, distribution grid modernization, demand response programs, utility-third party coordination, and forward-looking regulation and policy can help utilities efficiently meet increased electricity demands from EVs while facilitating the electrification of the transportation sector and decarburization of energy systems overall. With proper management, EVs could become integrated grid resources that support more reliable and affordable operation of the electric utility system with high renewable energy adoption.