Tag Archives: challenges

WHAT ARE SOME COMMON CHALLENGES THAT STUDENTS FACE WHEN COMPLETING THEIR DNP CAPSTONE PROJECTS

One of the biggest challenges is identifying an appropriate topic or project idea. Coming up with a novel and innovative quality improvement, program evaluation, or other evidence-based practice project that is meaningful and can be realistically completed within the program timelines can be difficult. Students have to find a topic that is significant enough to meet the capstone requirements, but also feasible given any limitations at their clinical site or organization. This requires thinking creatively about how to address an issue that matters, while also working within real-world constraints.

Once a topic is identified, the proposal and IRB application process can also pose challenges. Developing a clear, well-written proposal that thoroughly justifies the need for and significance of the project takes effort. The proposal must demonstrate a strong understanding of the topic and include a comprehensive literature review and detailed methodology. Gaining approval from an Institutional Review Board for projects involving human subjects can take additional time and require revisions. This means students need to start the proposal and IRB process early to allow sufficient time for potential delays or needed changes.

Often a major hurdle is implementation of the actual project. DNP students have to balance the demands of the capstone with other responsibilities like coursework, clinical hours, and work or family obligations. Recruiting participants, collecting and analyzing data, implementing interventions or programs, etc. within the planned timeframe while juggling other priorities can be difficult. Unexpected issues also frequently arise that impact timelines, such as difficulties engaging stakeholders, challenges enrolling enough participants, adjusting methods midstream, and ongoing covid related disruptions. Flexibility and contingency planning is important.

Communication and navigating organizational bureaucracy can pose additional barriers. Collaborating with stakeholders like practitioners, administrators, and staff at various levels of an organization is necessary for many capstone projects but requires diplomacy, persistence, and relationship building. Gaining access to needed resources, data, and full cooperation from busy individuals and departments isn’t always straightforward. Political realities and resistance to change may arise that students have to work tirelessly to overcome. Strong communication, creating buy-in, and addressing concerns is paramount for success.

Data management and analysis skills also present hurdles for some students, especially those from non-research intensive backgrounds. Working with large datasets, performing more advanced quantitative or qualitative analytic techniques, using statistical software programs, and ensuring data integrity can prove intimidating or difficult to learn independently within tight time constraints. Accessing consultation support from statistical experts, learning specialists, and faculty methodologists is important but not always readily available. Rigor and quality must not be sacrificed despite these analytic challenges.

Drafting the lengthy capstone manuscript and presentation of findings to meet university format standards is a labor intensive task that many find quite stressful. Effectively synthesizing everything into a polished, well-structured written document or oral defense takes significant effort and attention to detail. Incorporating feedback from multiple committee reviews in a timely manner while still meeting deadlines demands strong project management, writing, and time management abilities close to graduation.

While the capstone experience aims to allow DNP students to demonstrate enhanced competencies in advanced clinical, leadership, advocacy, and scholarship roles, it also inevitably presents numerous obstacles. From topic selection to implementation to evaluation and reporting of results, developing, conducting and documenting the project within program timeframes despite other responsibilities and hindrances requires the highest levels of independence, resilience, and problem-solving from students. With diligent planning, open communication, support access, and flexibility, they can certainly overcome these considerable challenges of the DNP capstone.

WHAT ARE SOME COMMON CHALLENGES THAT STUDENTS FACE WHEN DEVELOPING A CAPSTONE PROJECT

Time management is one of the biggest hurdles that capstone students have to contend with. A capstone project is meant to be a substantial culminating work that demonstrates a student’s skills and knowledge gained throughout their entire program. Capstone projects tend to have long timelines spanning several months. This gives students ample time to complete thorough research, develop their project methodology, gather and analyze data, write comprehensive reports/papers, and prepare final presentations. The extended timeline also means students have to balance their capstone work along with other courses, extracurricular activities, jobs, and personal commitments. Poor time management can jeopardize a capstone project. Students need to set clear short-term and long-term deadlines, create detailed schedules, and stick to them religiously. It also helps to block out dedicated time for capstone work every week without distractions.

Narrowing down the project topic and scope is another routine struggle. With so many potential topics and directions within their field of study, students tend to get overwhelmed selecting what to focus their capstone on. They may be tempted to choose something too broad or vague. An overly ambitious scope is difficult to complete within the timeframe and can result in superficial findings. It’s important to start the topic selection process early by brainstorming ideas, researching what has already been done, discussing with advisors, and narrowing it down to something meaningful yet feasible. Clearly defining the objectives, research questions, hypotheses to be tested, etc. helps create proper boundaries and focus.

Gathering quality research materials and resources is a consistent challenge. Students need in-depth subject knowledge, theories, methodologies, case studies, data sources, etc. for a high-caliber capstone. Too much information online makes it difficult to filter out unreliable sources from credible ones. students may waste a lot of time sifting through irrelevant material. They should utilize specialized library databases, scholarly journals, and verifiable websites. It’s also helpful to leverage the university librarians and subject matter experts for literature recommendations. establishing criteria to evaluate sources goes a long way in streamlining the research process.

Developing an appropriate methodology plan poses issues as well. While past theoretical frameworks and methods can inspire, directly copying them isn’t necessarily a good idea. Students need to customize study methodologies based on their specific project objectives, research questions, scope, resources and time constraints. Qualitative or quantitative, primary or secondary data – selecting the most optimal research design requires careful planning, deliberation and sometimes pilot testing. Getting inputs from advisors experienced in research methodologies strengthens the methodology design process.

Analysis and interpretation of collected data can prove difficult too. Making sense of large datasets, identifying trends, drawing logical inferences, and presenting unbiased conclusions takes nuanced analytical skills. Students may face challenges with lack of prior experience analyzing certain types of complex data. Consulting statistical analysis or qualitative data analysis guides, workshops, and subject matter experts helps in overcoming these hurdles. Using appropriate analysis tools, keeping records of the steps taken also eases the data analysis phase.

Organization and timeliness of written documentation presents frequent issues. Long-form research papers, executive summaries, process documentation, etc. require stringent formatting, structuring, editing and proofreading. Some struggle with writing cohesively on technical topics within word limits. Presentation slides also need careful planning. Self- imposed procrastination makes meeting deadlines stressful. Students must practice written communication skills, give themselves enough buffer time and get reviews from advisors to address these organizational challenges effectively.

With careful planning, topic selection, resource management, methodology design, analysis skills development, written documentation practices and time management – students can overcome most common capstone project hurdles. Reaching out for guidance from advisors, librarians, professors and subject experts also helps tackle issues and strengthen final project outputs.

WHAT ARE SOME COMMON CHALLENGES IN COORDINATING ELICITATION EFFORTS WITH STAKEHOLDERS

One of the biggest challenges is scheduling availability and finding times when key stakeholders are available to participate in elicitation sessions. Stakeholders often have very busy schedules with competing priorities and demands on their time. As a result, it can be difficult to schedule elicitation activities when all important stakeholders are present. There are a few things that can help address this challenge. First, elicitation activities need to be planned out well in advance so stakeholders have as much notice as possible to allocate time. It also helps to understand stakeholders’ schedules and find times that are relatively less busy if full availability is not possible. Another option is to conduct elicitation in shorter iterative sessions if multi-hour sessions are not feasible.

Ensuring participation from the full range of important stakeholders can also be difficult. Not all stakeholders view requirements engineering as a top priority and some may be reluctant to participate. Senior management support for the elicitation process is important to secure involvement from those who may not see direct value. It also helps to socialize the elicitation approach across stakeholder groups in advance and explain how their input will be used and how the final system may impact their work or needs. Making the process as inclusive as possible and valuing all perspectives can encourage participation. One-on-one interviews may be needed in some cases to elicit relevant information from reluctant stakeholders.

Gaining a shared understanding of problems, potential solutions, and key requirements among diverse stakeholder groups can also pose coordination challenges. Stakeholders often have very different backgrounds, domain expertise, priorities, and opinions that must be reconciled. During elicitation, facilitation is important to ensure all views are heard and understood and to guide the discussion toward consensus where possible. Mapping how different requirements interact and impact one another can help stakeholders develop a system-level perspective. Iterative elicitation allows refining understanding over time as viewpoints evolve. Having stakeholders from different backgrounds jointly analyze case studies or user scenarios can foster collaboration.

Eliciting an appropriate level of detail without over-specifying certain requirements or leaving others too vague also requires careful coordination. Doing too much detailed analysis too soon may overlook important high-level needs, but insufficient detail leaves room for misinterpretation later on. An incremental, iterative approach helps address this by first focusing on core needs before delving into specifics. Allowing flexibility to revisit requirements as understanding improves is also important. Soliciting examples and metrics where applicable helps add precision without being overly constraining prematurely. Continued involvement of stakeholders throughout the project will also aid balancing levels of detail as needs evolve.

Perspectives often change over time as various project-related uncertainties are resolved and new insights emerge. Maintaining current, traceable requirements becomes an ongoing coordination effort. Updating stakeholders on project progress helps ensure their needs and priorities are still accurately reflected in requirements. Periodic review and refinement sessions with key stakeholders can help validate requirements remain relevant and complete any gaps. Changes in organizational strategy or the introduction of new technologies may also necessitate revisiting certain requirements. Having processes for change requests, version control, and impact analysis supports coordinating an evolving set of requirements aligned with changing needs.

Successfully coordinating elicitation efforts requires addressing challenges related to scheduling, participation, reconciling diverse views, balancing levels of detail and ensuring requirements stay up-to-date. With careful planning, open communication, an iterative approach and ongoing involvement of stakeholders, these challenges can be overcome to develop a shared understanding of user needs and a comprehensive set of well-coordinated requirements. Continual coordination throughout the project helps validate requirements maintain strategic alignment as projects evolve.

WHAT ARE SOME COMMON CHALLENGES THAT STUDENTS FACE WHEN SELECTING A CAPSTONE PROJECT TOPIC

Selecting a topic for a capstone project can be one of the most challenging parts of completing a college degree program. As capstone projects are meant to showcase a student’s cumulative knowledge and skills from their entire course of study, it is important to choose a topic carefully. There are many obstacles students may encounter when trying to settle on the right topic.

One of the biggest issues is simply coming up with an original idea. With so many capstone projects having been completed before across different programs and universities, it can be difficult to think of something that has not already been extensively researched and written about. Students want their work to stand out and make a unique contribution, but struggle to find a niche that has not already been explored. Coming up with truly novel topics takes significant brainstorming and research to identify gaps in existing literature.

Narrowing down options is another major challenge. Once some potential areas of interest have been identified through initial research, students are then faced with determining which one to pursue among the options. Factors like feasibility within time constraints, available resources and data, faculty expertise, and personal passion all must be weighed. It can be unclear how to evaluate and compare different topics against each other based on these variables. Making a final selection from the options may delay getting started on the project.

Related to the previous issue, assessing feasibility is difficult. Even if students are passionate about an idea, they need to realistically evaluate if the scope can be adequately addressed with the standards expected of a capstone within given parameters. Ambitious topics risk becoming too broad to be thoroughly researched and analyzed within a single semester or academic year. Topics that seem too narrow may lack depth. Balancing feasibility with academic rigor takes experience to judge properly.

Finding an engaged faculty advisor can pose problems as well. Having a mentor invested in the topic is invaluable for guidance, but it may not always be clear which instructors share interests that align with potential topics. Faculty members also have limited time and bandwidth, so projects outside their expertise could be difficult for them to adequately support and evaluate. Students have to consider an advisor’s background and availability during selection. Mismatched interests can derail a project.

Accessing needed resources, data or case studies for research can be an obstacle too depending on the topic. Certain areas simply have fewer published materials available as prior scholarship compared to more established domains. Primary data collection may be proposed but comes with logistical and timeline challenges. If sources are largely restricted within an organization, external topics are riskier. Data availability shapes topic boundaries.

Students also experience difficulty tying topics directly back to their degree program or intended career path, a requirement of most capstone assignments. More interdisciplinary subjects appeal more but connecting them to the major can require creativity. Topics too far removed from the academic focus area may not meet advisor or departmental approval either. Balancing personal interest against program relevance factors into selection.

Changing interests over time pose a dilemma. As research gets underway, natural shifts occur in perspectives, knowledge and passions. Initial spark ideas may lose their luster as realities become clearer. Radical changes partway through risk delaying or complicating a planned timeline. Sticking too rigidly to a topic that no longer truly excites risks compromising motivation as well. Maintaining focus yet allowing natural evolution balances the dynamic nature of discovery with academic deadlines.

Capstone topic selection poses considerable obstacles for students to thoughtfully surmount. Careful consideration of originality, feasibility, advising support, resources, program relevance and evolving interests all weigh heavily in identifying the right path. With persistence through research and creativity, each challenge can be overcome to lay the groundwork for a successful culminating project. Support from mentors helps smooth the process.

WHAT ARE SOME COMMON CHALLENGES THAT STUDENTS FACE WHEN WORKING ON CLOUD COMPUTING CAPSTONE PROJECTS

One of the biggest challenges that students face is properly scoping the project. Cloud computing is a very broad field that touches on areas like infrastructure as a service, platform as a service, software as a service, and more. Students need to carefully identify the specific problem or application they want to focus on early in the process. Otherwise, there is a risk of the project becoming too broad or ambiguous in scope.

Related to project scoping is effectively managing expectations. Since this is a capstone project, there are expectations that it will demonstrate a high level of technical skills and knowledge. It’s also an academic exercise for students who are still learning. Setting realistic goals and delivering incremental work is important. It’s better to complete a well-designed smaller project than to bite off more than can reasonably be achieved.

Deadlines are also a major challenge. Capstone projects have strict deadline requirements to accommodate things like grading periods or project defenses. Cloud projects often involve Stand-up and configuring new infrastructure, which can be time consuming. Unanticipated complexities or delays accessing resources can cause schedule problems. Students need to plan schedules conservatively and communicate issues promptly.

Finding and accessing appropriate cloud resources within budget constraints can be difficult. Common cloud platforms have free tiers but expensive beyond that. Students need to right-size resources, estimate costs early, and may need to consider alternative free platform options. This requires research and planning that some students underestimate.

Designing for cloud-native principles like scalability, reliability, availability and maintainability is a steep learning curve for many. Students have to think differently than traditional applications, but may lack experience. Iterative development is needed plus guidance on best practices like microservices, immutable infrastructure, devops processes, monitoring etc.

Documentation and non-functional requirements are often given insufficient attention by students new to professional development. Things like security, logging, error handling, testing, deployment pipelines etc. are critical but take effort to implement properly for the cloud. Not fully addressing these can negatively affect grades.

Collaboration in teams can pose coordination and social challenges, especially if working virtually. Some students are not used to Agile methodologies and may struggle with tasks like estimating work, standups, managing dependencies and integrating each member’s work into a cohesive whole. Effective project management is needed.

Accessing cloud platform documentation and support resources varies greatly depending on the particular provider. Navigating and troubleshooting issues with an unfamiliar platform under time pressures is daunting. Important to leverage TAs, professors and user groups for help where possible.

Effective communication and establishing processes for managing expectations, scope, schedules and risks are important for student success. Iterative delivery, focusing on learning objectives over scope, and guidance from experienced faculty are also crucial for overcoming these common challenges. With proper support and realistic goal-setting, cloud capstone projects can still serve as an excellent learning experience despite inherent difficulties. Regular course corrections and adapting to challenges are part of the learning experience too.

While cloud computing capstone projects present exciting learning opportunities for students, they also commonly involve substantial difficulties related to project scoping and management, infrastructure setup, architectural design tradeoffs, collaboration, documentation and accessing support resources – all within the constraints of strict deadlines. With experience, students can overcome many challenges through disciplined processes, effective communication, and support from faculty and cloud providers. But it requires realistic expectations and focusing on incremental progress rather than perfection. With a well-designed plan and openness to course corrections, cloud capstones can succeed despite facing hurdles that are typical for student projects tackling new technologies.