Tag Archives: methods

WHAT ARE SOME COMMON RESEARCH METHODS USED IN NURSING CAPSTONE PROJECTS

Leave a reply

Nursing capstone projects allow nursing students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills attained throughout their nursing program. These projects involve conducting an original nursing research study on a topic of relevance to nursing practice, education, administration or theory. There are a variety of research methods that can be utilized in nursing capstone projects, with the appropriate method depending on the nature and purpose of the research study. Some of the most common research methods used include:

Quantitative Research Methods:

Descriptive research designs: These aim to objectively describe phenomena through collecting numerical data. They do not involve manipulating variables. Common descriptive designs include survey research, observational studies, case studies, and record reviews. Survey research involving questionnaires or structured interviews is very common in nursing capstone projects to collect data on topics such as patient/staff experiences, attitudes, beliefs and behaviors.

Correlational research designs: These aim to discover relationships between variables through statistical analysis without manipulating variables. They may examine how two variables such as patient characteristics and health outcomes are related. Correlation does not imply causation.

Experimental research designs: These aim to determine cause-and-effect relationships through manipulating an independent variable and measuring its effect on a dependent variable. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized control group pre-test/post-test designs are examples. Experimental designs are less common in capstone projects due to ethical and feasibility issues related to intentionally manipulating patient care.

Statistical analysis: Quantitative data collected through descriptive, correlational or experimental designs is typically analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistical tests using software like SPSS. Common analytic strategies include frequencies, measures of central tendency, hypothesis testing through t-tests, ANOVA, chi-square, correlation, and regression.

Qualitative Research Methods:

Phenomenological research: Aims to describe the essence of a lived experience around a phenomenon for several individuals. Often involves in-depth interviews to collect detailed descriptions which are then analyzed for themes. Focuses on understanding subjective experience rather than objective measurement.

Grounded theory research: Focuses on building theory through constant comparative analysis of qualitative data as it relates to categories and their properties. The goal is to generate a conceptual framework or theory to explain processes related to the topic. Data collection may involve interviews and observations coded and analyzed for emerging categories.

Ethnographic research: Focuses on understanding cultural behaviors, beliefs and interactions of a whole group who share some common trait, typically studied through extensive fieldwork over time using observation, interviewing and immersion. Less common in capstone due to time and resource demands.

Narrative research: Aims to explore life experiences through stories told by individuals in interviews or documents. Data analysis involves restorying the narrative to investigate the meaning individuals ascribe to their experience. Stories are interpreted for the researcher’s understanding rather than presenting an objective facts.

Content analysis: A research method for analyzing textual data through objective coding and categorizing patterns or themes within the content. Can be used to systematically evaluate written, electronic or visual communication data. Both qualitative and quantitative content analysis approaches exist.

Mixed Methods Research:

Convergent parallel mixed methods design: Collects quantitative and qualitative data simultaneously, analyzes separately, then mixes by comparing and contrasting results. Allows for a more comprehensive understanding through triangulation of findings.

Explanatory sequential mixed methods design: Collects quantitative data first, analyzes, then builds on results with in-depth qualitative follow up to help explain initial results. Gives voice to numeric outcomes.

Embedded mixed methods design: Collects both types of data within a predominant quantitative or qualitative design. Quantitative data used to support qualitative themes or vice versa for completeness.

Multi-phase mixed methods design: Involves collecting multiple forms of data using different designs over an extended timeframe in distinct phases, such as pilot and intervention/outcome testing.

To summarise, nursing students have a variety of robust research approaches and analytical techniques available to conduct rigorous nursing capstone research projects exploring topics relevant to evidence-based practice. Both quantitative and qualitative methods are commonly used, often in mixed designs, depending on the best fits with the research question, objectives, resources and intended outcomes of the study. Choosing the right method is vital for high quality nursing research.

CAN YOU PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE EVALUATION METHODS USED IN CAPSTONE PROJECTS

Leave a reply

Capstone projects are meant to demonstrate a student’s mastery of their field of study before graduating. Given this high-stakes purpose, it is important that capstone work is rigorously evaluated. There are several primary methods used to evaluate capstone projects:

rubric-based evaluation, faculty evaluation, peer evaluation, self-evaluation, and end-user evaluation. Often a combination of these methods is used to provide a well-rounded assessment.

Rubric-based evaluation involves using a detailed rubric or grading scheme to assess the capstone work. A strong rubric will outline the specific criteria being evaluated and the standards or levels of performance expected. Common rubric criteria for capstone projects include areas like problem definition, research and literature review, methodology, analysis, presentation of findings, and conclusion. The rubric allows for an objective evaluation of how well the student addressed each criterion. Sample language in a rubric may state that an “A” level response provided a clear and comprehensive problem definition while a “C” level response only partially defined the problem. Rubrics help ensure evaluations are consistent, transparent and aligned to learning objectives.

Faculty evaluation involves the capstone advisor or committee directly assessing the student’s work. Faculty are well-positioned to evaluate based on their expertise in the field and deep understanding of the capstone guidelines and expectations. They can assess elements that may be harder to capture in a rubric like the sophistication of analysis, originality of work, or integration of knowledge across the discipline. Faculty evaluations require detailed notes and justification to fully explain the assessment and be as objective as possible. Students also have the opportunity to receive personalized feedback to help future work.

Peer evaluation involves having other students in the same program or classmates who worked on related capstones review and provide input on capstone work. Peer reviewers can provide an additional perspective beyond just faculty and help evaluate elements like clarity of communication, organization, or approachability of the work for other students. Peers may lack the full depth of subject matter expertise that faculty provide. To address this, training is often given to peer evaluators on the evaluation process and criteria.

Self-evaluation requires students to critically reflect on and assess their own capstone work. This helps develop important self-assessment skills and can provide additional context for evaluators beyond just the end product. Self-evaluations on their own may lack objectivity since students have personal stake in the outcome. They are generally combined with external evaluations.

If the capstone project has an end user such as a client, external stakeholders can also provide valuable evaluation. For applied projects, end users are well-placed to assess elements like the project’s satisfaction of needs, usability, feasibility of solutions, usefulness of recommendations, and overall value. End users may lack understanding of academic expectations and standards.

Ideally, capstone evaluations incorporate a balanced combination of quantitative rubric scores alongside qualitative commentary from multiple perspectives – faculty, peers, and end users where applicable. Triangulating assessments in this way helps gain a comprehensive picture of student learning and performance that a single method could miss. It also reinforces the rigors expected at the culminating experience of a degree program. With transparent criteria and calibration across evaluators, this multi-method approach supports meaningful and consistent evaluation of capstone work.

Capstone evaluations commonly leverage rubric-based scoring, faculty evaluations, peer review, self-assessment, and end-user input to achieve comprehensive and objective assessment. Combining quantitative and qualitative data from internal and external stakeholders provides rich evaluation of student mastery at the conclusion of their academic journey. The rigor and multi-method nature of capstone evaluations aligns with their high-stakes role of verifying competency for program completion.