The University of Calgary utilizes a rigorous capstone project evaluation process to assess student learning outcomes and ensure quality of academic work. Capstone projects allow students to demonstrate synthesis and application of their entire program of study in a real-world oriented project. Given the significance of the capstone experience, the university emphasizes a comprehensive evaluation approach.
Each faculty or department that includes a capstone project component has developed a dedicated capstone course with clear learning objectives and evaluation criteria. Instructors for these courses are typically faculty members with expertise in the discipline and experience supervising complex student projects. The specific evaluation approach may vary slightly between programs but always incorporates multiple assessment aspects.
A key part of evaluation is the project proposal. Early in the capstone course, students must submit a detailed proposal outlining their project idea, objectives, methods, expected outcomes or deliverables, timeline, and any other required components. Instructors provide feedback to help shape and refine the proposal before students begin substantive work. Proposals are assessed based on the clarity and feasibility of the project scope as well as demonstration that it aligns with course and program learning goals. Only fully developed proposals are approved to move forward.
Throughout the capstone work period, instructors conduct regular check-ins with each student to monitor progress, discuss any issues or roadblocks, and ensure projects stay on track. Students must submit interim written updates documenting developments and addressing any feedback received previously. Instructors use these updates, in conjunction with in-person meetings, to continuously evaluate whether projects are progressing according to the approved proposal and determine if any revisions are needed.
The quality of the final capstone product or deliverable is a major factor in the overall evaluation. Products take varied forms depending on the discipline, such as technical reports, research papers, needs assessments, designs/prototypes, databases, etc. Instructors assess final products using rubrics that consider parameters including organization, quality of content, adherence to standards, innovation, and demonstration of learning at an advanced level. Products undergoing external review receive additional scrutiny. Feedback is provided to help students improve competencies.
In addition to project proposals and deliverables, evaluation incorporates various other components. An oral presentation showcasing the capstone work to instructors and other stakeholders allows for questioning and demonstration of presentation skills. Self-assessment and reflection assignments measure students’ ability to self-critique and recognize the value of the experience. Peer reviews have students evaluate colleagues’ work to develop feedback abilities.
The capstone course grade is calculated using a predetermined weighting of the various assessment pieces. Instructors consider the rubric/evaluation results from all components and may make adjustments to the initial algorithmic grade based on a more holistic understanding of each student’s performance and learning over the full capstone period. Capstone work deemed exceptionally strong could merit special recognition.
To maintain high academic standards, the University of Calgary regularly reviews capstone courses and programs. Feedback from external reviewers, students, alumni and employers informs ongoing improvements. When fully implemented, the robust evaluation process ensures capstone projects achieve their purpose of allowing students to apply comprehensive knowledge at an advanced level, thereby certifying qualified graduates ready for professional or research roles. The rigorous approach aligns with the university’s commitment to excellence in teaching and learning.
Through a comprehensive evaluation system leveraging multiple aligned assessments, the University of Calgary is able to appropriately gauge student performance in capstone experiences and confirm demonstrated attainment of high-level program outcomes. The detailed approach also supports continuous enhancement of capstone project design and instruction to maintain relevance and quality.