Tag Archives: analyzed

HOW WILL THE QUALITATIVE FEEDBACK FROM SURVEYS FOCUS GROUPS AND INTERVIEWS BE ANALYZED USING NVIVO

Leave a reply

NVivo is a qualitative data analysis software developed by QSR International to help users organize, analyze, and find insights in unstructured qualitative data like interviews, focus groups, surveys, articles, social media and web content. Some of the key ways it can help analyze feedback from different qualitative sources are:

Organizing the data: The first step in analyzing qualitative feedback is organizing the different data sources in NVivo. Surveys can be imported directly from tools like SurveyMonkey or Google Forms. Interview/focus group transcriptions, notes and audio recordings can also be imported. This allows collating all the feedback in one place to start coding and analyzing.

Attribute coding: Attributes like participant demographics (age, gender etc.), location, question number can be coded against each respondent to facilitate analysis based on these attributes. This helps subgroup and compare feedback based on attributes when analyzing themes.

Open coding: Open or emergent coding involves reading through the data and assigning codes/labels to text, assigning descriptive names to capture meaning and patterns. This allows identifying preliminary themes and topics emerging from feedback directly from words and phrases used.

Coding queries: As more data is open coded, queries can be run to find all responses related to certain themes, keywords, codes etc. This makes it easy to quickly collate feedback linked to particular topics without manually scrolling through everything. Queries are extremely useful for analysis.

Axial coding: This involves grouping open codes together to form higher level categories and hierarchies. Similar codes referring to same/linked topics are grouped under overarching themes. This brings structure and organization to analysis by grouping related topics together at different abstraction levels.

Case coding: Specific cases or respondents that provide particularly insightful perspective can be marked or coded for closer examination. Case nodes help flag meaningful exemplars in the data for deeper contextual understanding during analysis.

Concept mapping: NVivo allows developing visual concept maps that help see interconnections between emergent themes, sub-themes and categories in a graphical non-linear format. These provide a “big picture” conceptual view of relationships between different aspects under examination.

Coding comparison: Coding comparison helps evaluate consistency of coding between different researchers/coders by comparing amount of agreement. This ensures reliability and rigor in analyzing qualitative data by multiple people.

Coded query reports: Detailed reports can be generated based on different types of queries run. These reports allow closer examination of themes, cross-tabulation between codes/attributes, comparison between cases and sources etc. Reports facilitate analysis of segments from different angles.

Modeling and longitudinal analysis: Relationships between codes and themes emerging over time can be modeled using NVivo. Feedback collected at multiple points can be evaluated longitudinally to understand evolution and changes in perspectives.

With NVivo, all sources – transcripts, notes, surveys, images etc. containing qualitative feedback data are stored, coded and linked to an underlying query-able database structure that allows users to leverage the above and many other tools to thoroughly examine emergent patterns, make connections between concepts and generate insights. The software allows methodically organizing unstructured text based data, systematically coding text segments, visualizing relationships and gleaning deep understanding to inform evidence-based decisions. For any organization collecting rich qualitative inputs regularly from stakeholders, NVivo provides a very powerful centralized platform for systematically analyzing suchfeedback.

NVivo is an invaluable tool for analysts and researchers to rigorously analyze and gain valuable intelligence from large volumes of qualitative data sources like surveys, interviews and focus groups. It facilitates a structured, transparent and query-able approach to coding emergent themes, comparing perspectives, relating concepts and ultimately extracting strategic implications and recommendations backed by evidence from verbatim customer/user voices. The software streamlines what would otherwise be an unwieldy manual process, improving efficiency and credibility of insights drawn.

HOW WILL THE FEEDBACK FROM CLINICAL EXPERTS AND PATIENTS BE COLLECTED AND ANALYZED

Leave a reply

Collecting meaningful and useful feedback from clinical experts and patients is crucial for the development of new medical treatments and technologies. A robust feedback process allows researchers and developers to gain valuable insights that can help improve outcomes for patients. Some key aspects of how feedback could be collected and analyzed at various stages of the development process include:

During early research and development stages, focus groups and design thinking workshops with clinicians and patients can help inform what needs exist and how new solutions may help address unmet needs. Audio recordings of these sessions would be transcribed to capture all feedback and ideas. Transcripts would then be analyzed for themes, pain points, and common insights using qualitative data analysis software. This early feedback is formative and helps shape the direction of the project.

Once prototypes are developed, usability testing sessions with clinicians and patients would provide feedback on early user experiences. These sessions would be video recorded with participants’ consent to capture interactions with the prototypes. Recordings would then be reviewed and analyzed to identify any usability issues, things participants struggled with, aspects they found intuitive, and overall impressions. Researchers may use qualitative coding techniques to systematically analyze the recordings for reoccurring themes. Feedback from these sessions helps make refinements and improvements to prototypes before larger pilot studies.

When pilot studies involve real-world use of new technologies or treatments, multiple methods are useful for collecting comprehensive feedback. Clinicians and patients in pilot studies could be asked to complete online questionnaires about their experiences at various time points such as initial use, one week follow up, one month follow up, and study completion. Questions would address impact on clinical workflows, ease of use, patient experience and outcomes, and overall impressions. Questionnaires would be designed using best practices for question wording and response scales to produce high quality quantitative data.

In addition to questionnaires, pilot study participants could optionally participate in 30-60 minute interviews or focus groups. A semi-structured interview guide would be used consistently across all interviews and groups to allow for systematic comparative analysis while still permitting open discussion of experiences. Interviews and groups would be audio recorded with consent for transcription and analysis. Recordings may be transcribed using speech recognition software and transcriptions would then be coded and analyzed thematically. Quantitative questionnaire data and qualitative interview/group data combined provide a comprehensive picture of real-world experiences.

To analyze feedback at scale from large pilot studies or post-market surveillance, Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques may be applied to unstructured text data like questionnaires comments, transcripts, clinical notes, and patient/clinician written reviews. NLP involves using machine learning algorithms to extract semantic meaning from vast amounts of free-form text. It allows for sentiment analysis to understand if feedback is positive or negative, and also topic modeling to surface common themes or concerns that emerge from the data. Combined with techniques like statistical analysis of Likert scale responses, this approach analyzes both qualitative and quantitative feedback at a large scale with a level of rigor not possible through manual coding alone.

All analyzed feedback would be systematically tracked in a searchable database along with key details about when and from whom the feedback was received. Clinicians, researchers and product developers would have access to review feedback themes, Sentiments, and identified issues/enhancements. Regular reports on gathered feedback would also help inform strategic product roadmaps and planning for future research studies. The database allows feedback to have a visible impact and influence on the continuous improvement of solutions over time based on real-world input from intended end users.

Collecting feedback from multiple qualitative and quantitative sources at various stages of development, coupled with robust analytic techniques helps uncover valuable insights that can strengthen new medical solutions to better serve clinicians and improve patient outcomes. A systematic, multifaceted approach to feedback collection and analysis ensures a continuous learning process throughout the lifecycle of developing technologies and treatments.