Tag Archives: assessing

WHAT ARE SOME KEY FACTORS TO CONSIDER WHEN ASSESSING THE FEASIBILITY OF CREATING AN HR SHARED SERVICES CENTER?

Leave a reply

Cost Savings and Economies of Scale

One of the primary goals of establishing an HR shared services center is to reduce costs through economies of scale. By consolidating common HR transactional processes like benefits administration, payroll processing, recruitment, etc. across different business units or legal entities, there are opportunities to reduce overhead costs. A larger centralized team can handle the volume of work more efficiently compared to having these functions spread out in each business unit. Standardizing systems, processes and policies further drives efficiencies. Detailed cost-benefit analysis considering factors like staffing requirements, technology investments required, expected transaction volumes etc. would need to be done to evaluate potential cost savings.

Process Standardization

For a shared services model to be effective, it is important that the HR processes handled by the center are standardized. Key transactional processes should be harmonized with common workflows, documents, approvals etc. across all client groups. This allows the centralized team to handle the work in a streamlined, uniform manner gaining maximum benefits of consolidation. Assessing the level of standardization currently existing across different HR functions, client groups and geographies is important. The effort required to standardize legacy disparate systems, policies etc. should also be considered in feasibility evaluation.

Scope of Services

Defining the appropriate scope of services that would be handled by the HR shared services center is a critical factor. The scope could range from basic transactional services like data entry, time & attendance, payroll processing to more strategic services like HR analytics, talent acquisition etc. Feasibility would depend on factors like the capabilities required in the shared services team, investment needs, expected ROI, impact on the organizations etc. An optimal balance needs to be struck between scope of services and business case.

Client Onboarding and Transition

Transitioning the HR responsibilities and employees (if any) of client groups to the shared services model requires detailed planning. Engaging clients, communicating changes, transitioning data and processes, HR employee relations, training client SPOCs are some aspects to consider. A phased transition approach may be required. Client acceptance, readiness and cooperation are important to the success and sustainability of the shared services model. Resistance to change could impact feasibility.

Technology Enablement

Effective HR shared services is heavily reliant on enabling technologies like ERP systems, workflow automation tools, case management systems, portals, reporting solutions etc. The complexity and cost of implementing and integrating these technologies need to be evaluated. Existing systems landscape across client groups, compatibility, data migration needs are factors in assessing technology requirements and feasibility.

Governance Structure

Developing a robust governance structure which clearly defines roles of the shared services entity vs client groups is important. Aspects like decision rights, SLA frameworks, dispute resolution mechanisms, review mechanisms need clarity upfront. Governance defines accountability which impacts sustainability. Governance design should balance efficiency gains with client experience and control considerations.

Regulatory and Compliance Needs

Shared services center operations need to adhere to various employment, payroll, data privacy, and other applicable compliance regulations across jurisdictions. Performing due diligence on regulatory landscapes for all in-scope geographies and functions becomes important from a feasibility perspective. Addressing compliance needs can impact timelines, efforts and costs significantly.

Resourcing and Talent Availability

A reliable source of requisite skills and capabilities is needed at the shared services location. Factors like availability of labor pools with appropriate HR generalist, domain and technology skills, language abilities, scalability need assessment form part of feasibility evaluation. Attrition risk over the long term also needs consideration while resourcing the shared services center.

Location Strategy

Selecting the right location(s) for establishing shared services center(s) is a strategic decision impacting costs, proximity to clients, access to talent, business continuity etc. A thorough analysis of location options based on primary selection criteria allows data-driven decisions on location strategy and feasibility

Change Management Planning

A robust change management strategy is critical to successful establishment and sustainability of shared services model. Aspects like stakeholder engagement, communications approach, organizational readiness assessment, change impacts on clients and internal teams need detailed planning. Change management implementation timeline, costs are factors in feasibility review.

Carefully evaluating the key factors listed above through a cross-functional, data-driven feasibility study approach allows for an objective assessment of opportunities, risks and overall viability of the HR shared services center concept. A favorable feasibility would set the foundation for a successful shared services transformation initiative.

CAN YOU PROVIDE ANY TIPS FOR EFFECTIVELY ASSESSING THE OVERALL QUALITY OF A CAPSTONE PROJECT?

Leave a reply

When assessing the quality of a capstone project, it is important to consider several key areas. The capstone represents the culmination of a student’s learning during their time in a degree program, so a high-quality capstone should demonstrate comprehensive understanding of the major themes and skills learned.

The first area to assess is the clarity and appropriateness of the project goal. A well-crafted capstone will have a focused goal that is challenging yet attainable. The goal should be aligned with the field of study and address an issue or problem that requires complex synthesis of learning. Check that the student clearly defines the goal upfront and explains how it fits within their discipline.

Next, evaluate the quality of the literature review and background research. A significant portion of the capstone work should involve investigating what subject matter experts and previous research say about the topic. The student needs to find, analyze, summarize, and synthesize relevant literature to establish the importance and context of the project. Assess whether the student displays a command of the key debates, concepts, and methodologies in the literature. The sources cited should be high-quality, current, and come from credible academic journals or publications.

The methodology is another important aspect to examine. For projects involving primary research, ensure the student describes a systematic methodology that is valid, reliable and ethical. The methods chosen should be appropriate for accomplishing the stated goal and answering the research question. Check that procedures are described in enough detail that the project could be replicated by others. For non-research projects, evaluate whether the approach and logic for accomplishing the goal is clearly laid out and thoughtful.

When reviewing the analysis and findings sections, make sure the student demonstrates high-level cognitive skills like critical thinking, creative problem solving, and persuasive communication of ideas. The analysis should go beyond simply summarizing data to include insights, connections to theory, and evidence-backed conclusions. Numeric data should be correctly analyzed using statistics and presented visually through clear charts or graphs. Qualitative analysis requires interpretation skill. The findings must directly relate back to and address the original research question or problem.

Examine the capstone discussion section for demonstration of advanced synthesis skills. An excellent discussion will contextualize the findings within the broader literature, acknowledge limitations and implications, suggest applications, and recommend areas for future research. The student should convey how the project outcomes advance knowledge or understanding within their field of study. The discussion demonstrates the student has progressed beyond simple description to gain deeper insight into issues.

Also consider how well the student communicated their work through structure, writing quality, and appropriate use of formal academic writing conventions. Assess visual components like figures, diagrams, multimedia, or other design elements based on how effectively they enhance understanding. All citations and references should adhere to copyright and adhere to formal style guidelines. The finished presentation should feel polished and cohesive.

Think about whether the project reflects competencies students need for their intended career path or further education. Does it show development into an independent, self-motivated learner? To what extent does the work have value to an external stakeholder, end user or broader community? An excellent capstone project applies what the student has learned to make a meaningful contribution or impact.

A capstone project that meets high standards across all of these key dimensions demonstrates the student has achieved substantial learning through their degree program. The most impressive capstones showcase advanced scholarly skills, demonstrate initiative and creativity, advance knowledge in the field, and have significance beyond academic requirements. With rigorous assessment of capstones against criteria like these, institutions can ensure their degrees confer the intended educational benefits.