Tag Archives: messaging

HOW CAN SOCIAL MEDIA BE EFFECTIVELY UTILIZED TO SPREAD POSITIVE MESSAGING ABOUT VACCINATIONS

Social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram provide an immense opportunity to spread positive messages about vaccinations in a strategic and informed manner. Countering anti-vaccination misinformation requires a thoughtful, evidence-based approach focused on sharing facts to increase understanding rather than accusing others. Some effective tactics include:

Targeting influential medical experts, public health organizations and celebrities with large followings to share clear, credible information from reputable sources like the CDC and WHO. Third party experts are often viewed as more trustworthy than directly from pharmaceutical companies or government. Videos and graphics that simply and accessibly explain how vaccines work and their benefits are ideal for spreading on platforms with primarily visual content like Instagram and YouTube. Leveraging “mommy bloggers” and parenting influencers to share honest personal experiences with vaccinating their own children can be impactful for reaching parents. Emphasizing that herd immunity protects the most vulnerable like newborns and immunocompromised individuals taps into people’s empathy and sense of community responsibility.

Partnering with search engines and social media companies to optimize for credible vaccination content in search results and newsfeeds would help direct users to facts over fiction. Platforms could consider labeling or “deboosting” provably false anti-vaccine claims to reduce their visibility and spread. At the same time, censorship risks further polarizing debates and driving views underground so should only target clear misinformation, not dissenting opinions.

Sharing personal stories from those affected by vaccine-preventable diseases can help illustrate the serious, life-threatening realities of these illnesses to counter perceptions they are not dangerous in developed nations. An overly fear-based approach risks defensiveness so stories should emphasize survivors’ resilience and gratitude for vaccines rather than instilling panic. Focusing on community spirit by highlighting how vaccination protects everyone’s health allows counteracting the individualist “my body, my choice” narratives used by some anti-vaccination groups.

Grassroots groups and local parenting organizations are well positioned to share science-based information face-to-face at community events and on neighborhood social networks. Their trusted members have influence and credibility that national campaigns lack. Providing them with easy-to-understand resources tailored for different audiences allows disseminating facts where vaccination questions arise organically. Local healthcare clinics and professionals can engage parents during routine pediatric appointments by honestly addressing commonly expressed concerns and directing them to additional online information for further learning.

Promoting vaccination not just as a health issue but also an economic and security issue resonates with different audiences. Facts about costs to society of vaccine-preventable outbreaks and risks to vulnerable supply chains or military readiness from resurgent diseases cross ideological divides. Emphasizing vaccination as everyone’s collective responsibility to public health, community well-being and future global stability builds wider support for it as a societal priority. The strategy must be to make facts easy to access, share reassuring personal experiences, build community support networks and optimize social platforms to highlight science-based information from authorities in a thoughtful, solution-oriented manner.

While some individuals remain impervious to facts due to preexisting ideological biases, most are open to hearing evidence presented respectfully without accusation. An approach focused on enabling education over confrontation, building understanding rather than conflict is most likely to increase vaccine confidence where it has eroded. Frameworks emphasizing community cohesion and responsibility as both a regional and global citizen can appeal across political and socio-economic divides. With credible experts and influencers sharing clear evidence at local grassroots levels augmented by optimization of algorithms to reduce the spread of blatant misinformation, social media’s powerful networking effects can help tilt the public discourse back towards facts and community wellness regarding vaccines.

HOW DOES TELEGRAM’S MONETIZATION STRATEGY COMPARE TO OTHER MESSAGING PLATFORMS

Telegram has taken a unique approach to monetization compared to other popular messaging platforms such as WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, WeChat, and LINE. While many messaging apps have adopted paid subscription models or in-app advertising and promotions, Telegram has so far avoided these monetization tactics in favor of other innovative strategies.

Telegram is considered a “freemium” service as users can enjoy the basic features for free, but paid subscriptions are available to unlock additional premium features. Unlike other messaging platforms, Telegram does not place ads or in-app promotions and has stated they never will due to concerns over how ads could impact user privacy and experience. Instead, Telegram relies mainly on optional donations from its large existing user base to fund ongoing development and server costs. Telegram is able to offer these services without ads currently because founder Pavel Durov has pledged around $200 million from his personal fortune to support the app.

Telegram launched “Telegram Premium” in June 2022, introducing a paid subscription for the first time. Premium subscribers can receive a larger maximum number of contacts, folders, pins, and more. Premium also increases file upload limits and introduces exclusive animated emoji and reactions. Telegram Premium costs $4.99 per month but the company claims this optional subscription will be enough for Telegram to fully support itself without any future need for alternative monetization methods like ads.

In contrast, WhatsApp employs no monetization at all presently since it is owned by Facebook parent company Meta. WhatsApp did have plans to introduce optional business-focused paid services and in-app purchases, but that was delayed indefinitely after a user backlash over privacy concerns. WhatsApp has over 2 billion users but generates no direct revenue, relying solely on Meta’s other business revenues to fund development.

Meta’s other messaging platforms like Facebook Messenger and Instagram Direct have prominent in-app advertising including product and service recommendations. Businesses can promote their Messenger profiles, chats, stories, and online stores through ads. Messenger also offers subscription plans for businesses’ customer service capabilities through tools like Messenger API bots.

WeChat in China has become a powerful super app with a wide array of services completely integrated within the messaging experience. WeChat monetizes through digital payments services, gaming integrations, and a thriving mini program ecosystem similar to mobile apps where businesses can promote and sell digital goods/services. WeChat takes a cut of revenues from these integrations that has made it immensely profitable for parent company Tencent without any ads within the core chat functions.

Japanese messaging platform LINE also emphasizes services beyond communication including games, commerce, and digital content integrated directly into the app experience. LINE generates major revenues through its games including Puzzle & Dragons, sales of LINE-based stickers and digital goods, advertising, and a payments platform called LINE Pay similar to WeChat Pay. LINE has also explored optional premium LINE TV and phone plan subscriptions.

Korean messaging giant Kakao follows a South Korean model emphasizing built-in mini games accessible via chat profiles which generate abundant in-game purchases. KakaoTalk also earns income from a music streaming service, loyalty points program, commerce platform, and its digital wallet service Kakao Pay.

In summary – while most messaging platforms depend heavily on in-app ads, e-commerce integrations or paid subscriptions – Telegram has resisted this approach so far through Pavel Durov’s initial funding and the recent premium subscription option. WeChat, LINE, Kakao and Messenger align more with the super app model fully integrating overlays services alongside communication. But Telegram seeks to keep a tighter separation of chat functionality from additional monetized overlays and services. Only time will tell if Telegram Premium generates enough ongoing revenue or if alternative strategies may eventually be explored.