RMIT University implements a rigorous capstone project assessment process to ensure students demonstrate the full scope of their learning across their degree program. Capstone projects allow students to undertake a substantial piece of independent work related to their field of study, integrating and applying the theoretical and practical skills they have developed.

Assessment of capstone projects at RMIT involves both formative and summative components. Formatively, students receive ongoing feedback and guidance from their capstone supervisor throughout the project duration. Supervisors meet regularly with students to discuss progress, provide advice, and help them refine their project direction or approach as needed. Students are expected to demonstrate active engagement with the feedback and guidance received.

Summative assessment occurs at the project completion stage. All capstone projects under supervison undergo a formal evaluation process. Projects are assessed against a detailed marking rubric that covers criteria such as research rigor, problem-solving skills, communication ability, self-directed learning, and demonstration of disciplinary knowledge. The specific criteria and their weightings vary slightly between different schools and departments depending on the nature and requirements of each field of study.

For written projects such as research dissertations or reports, assessment involves at least two markers – the student’s capstone supervisor and another academic from their school who was not involved in supervision of the project. Both markers independently assess the project using the standard rubric and provide a numeric grade. Their grades are moderated and an agreed final grade determined. If there is a discrepancy of more than 10% between the two grades, the project is reviewed by a third assessor to determine the final grade.

For non-written projects such as designs, performances or exhibitions, slightly different assessment processes are followed. The student’s supervisor leads assessment but is joined by at least one other specialist academic in the relevant field. Multiple formative and summative assessments may occur throughout the project, with continual feedback provided to students. Professional peers or individuals from industry may also be involved in assessment panels depending on the project type and disciplinary conventions.

All students undergo an oral examination of their capstone project, regardless of whether it results in a written document. Oral examinations are conducted by a panel consisting of at least two academics, usually including the student’s supervisor. The examination assesses students’ ability to discuss, explain and defend their work, as well as respond knowledgeably to questions that probe the depth and scope of learning demonstrated throughout their degree program.

Once grading is finalised, capstone supervisors provide comprehensive feedback reports for students outlining their strengths and areas for future development. These, along with the agreed final grade, are formally recorded. Students must achieve a pass or higher in order to fulfil the requirements for their degree. While rare, failures can occur if projects fall well below standard or where academic misconduct such as plagiarism is identified. In such cases, students may be asked to re-submit or completely re-do their capstone work.

Each semester, RMIT conducts rigorous moderation of assessment practices and outcomes across all disciplines to ensure consistency, fairness and academic standards. Supervisors and examiners are regularly reviewed to maintain quality. Capstone projects play a vital role in demonstrating the proficiency of RMIT graduates. This comprehensive, multicriteria assessment process allows for robust evaluation of student learning and preparedness for professional practice.

RMIT takes a rigorous yet supportive approach to capstone project assessment that engages multiple assessors, incorporates formative and summative stages, examines work through various lenses as appropriate to different disciplines, provides detailed individualized feedback, and undergoes institution-wide moderation to assure academic quality and consistency of outcomes. The process is designed to deliver in-depth evaluation of each student’s knowledge, skills and attributes developed through their degree.