Tag Archives: texas

WHAT ARE SOME EXAMPLES OF CROSS DISCIPLINARY CAPSTONE PROJECTS AT TEXAS A M UNIVERSITY

Texas A&M University places a strong emphasis on cross-disciplinary capstone projects that allow students to integrate knowledge and skills from multiple fields to solve real-world problems. These types of projects provide invaluable experience for students as they prepare to enter a workforce that increasingly demands collaboration and innovative thinking.

One example of a large cross-disciplinary capstone project undertaken by Texas A&M students in recent years was developing accessible technology solutions for people with disabilities. A team of students from computer science, engineering, industrial distribution, and spatial sciences came together to design and prototype new assistive devices. They conducted user research, developed prototypes using 3D printing and other methods, and tested their solutions with people who have disabilities. The project addressed real needs and pushed the students to think beyond their individual disciplines.

Another notable project involved designing off-grid renewable energy solutions for rural communities in developing nations that lack access to traditional electricity infrastructure. Students from fields like mechanical engineering, construction science, agriculture, and geospatial science worked as an interdisciplinary team. They proposed customized energy systems combining solar, wind, biomass, and battery technologies that could provide power for vital community services like schools and medical clinics. Part of their work involved researching the technical specifications needed as well as evaluating socioeconomic and environmental sustainability factors.

Texas A&M students have also taken on ambitious global health challenges through cross-disciplinary collaboration. One capstone project brought together students from fields such as biomedical engineering, architecture, nutrition, and health promotion. They partnered with a non-profit organization helping rural communities in sub-Saharan Africa. The goal was to develop an integrated approach for addressing multiple health issues like waterborne diseases, malnutrition, and limited access to medical care. Their proposed solutions included designing inexpensive water filtration systems, educational programs on hygiene and nutrition, and preliminary plans for a multi-purpose health clinic. Getting input from local community members was also a key part of their work.

Yet another example of an impactful cross-disciplinary project involved developing flood prevention and response strategies for parts of India that regularly suffer damages from seasonal monsoon rains and river flooding. An international team of civil engineering, geoscience, hydrology, agricultural, and public policy students worked on this challenge. They created sophisticated hydrological and risk modeling to map flood-prone areas and help with evacuation planning. The group also proposed more permanent solutions such as improved drainage systems, flood walls, raising homes on stilts, and implementing agricultural best practices to reduce erosion during heavy rains. Coordinating with local governments was a significant aspect of validating their recommendations.

Staying within the state of Texas, one capstone brought together students from disciplines like construction science, landscape architecture, urban planning, and business administration. They partnered with the city of Bryan to develop a strategic revitalization plan for its downtown area aimed at improving economic, social and environmental sustainability. Proposals included renovating historic buildings, introducing mixed-use redevelopment projects, upgrading parks and public spaces, developing the arts district, enhancing walkability and bicycle infrastructure, recruiting targeted businesses and entrepreneurs, and capitalizing on events and cultural amenities to drive visitation to the area. Careful financial modeling and buy-in from key local stakeholder groups were crucial dimensions of the project.

Moving to a more technology-focused example, computer science and electrical engineering students teamed up with kinesiology and sports management majors on a project centered around developing new performance analytics and training tools for athletes. They designed smartphone apps, wearable sensors, and data visualization dashboards to help quantify physical metrics like speed, distances covered, jumps completed, heart rate variability, and more during games and practice. Machine learning algorithms were also applied to identify patterns and optimally target areas for improvement. Coaches and athletes testing the prototypes found them highly useful for gaining new data-driven insights into physical performance, injury prevention and developing personalized training regimens.

This covers just a sampling of the extensive cross-disciplinary work undertaken in capstone projects at Texas A&M University. As this overview illustrates, bringing together diverse areas of expertise to address complex challenges mirrors real-world problems that do not fall neatly into single disciplines. These collaborative experiences provide immense value in preparing Aggie graduates to be innovative leaders capable of driving meaningful change.

HOW ARE CAPSTONE PROJECTS EVALUATED AT TEXAS A M UNIVERSITY

Capstone projects at Texas A&M University provide students the opportunity to integrate and apply what they have learned throughout their academic program by completing a substantial project. Capstone projects are meant to demonstrate a student’s mastery of their field of study before graduation. At Texas A&M, capstones are evaluated through a rigorous process to ensure projects meet high standards.

Each academic department or program that requires a capstone establishes an evaluation methodology tailored to their specific field but incorporating common elements. Generally, projects are assessed based on a rubric or grading scheme that examines several key dimensions of the work. Common areas that are evaluated include:

Scope: Evaluators assess whether the project is appropriately substantial and ambitious given the student’s level of training. Capstones should push the boundaries of a student’s knowledge and challenge them to work at the next level. The scope is examined to ensure the project is neither too narrow and inconsequential or too broad to realistically complete.

Design/Methodology: The proposal, approach, research design, methodology or process used to conduct the project work is thoroughly reviewed. Evaluators examine whether the design is well thought out, appropriate to achieve the stated goals or answer the research question, utilizes best practices in the field, and was properly followed and documented. Any limitations or weaknesses in the methodology are identified.

Critical Analysis: For research projects, evaluators assess the depth and rigor of analysis. They examine whether conclusions were logically drawn from the evidence, alternative perspectives were considered, and limitations were acknowledged. For other types of projects, evaluators assess the quality of critical thinking demonstrated and insights that went into designing, developing or improving the deliverable.

Solution/Outcomes: The final outcome, product, findings or solution developed through the project work is carefully evaluated. Assessors examine its originality, creativity, practical utility, value added given the scope, as well as technical merit. For research, they determine if conclusions were supported and questions answered. Other measurable outcomes are also assessed against the stated goals.

Communication: Both written documentation (reports, papers, etc.) and oral presentation of the project work are evaluated. Assessors examine clarity, organization, quality of writing/speaking, effectiveness of visual aids, and ability to convey technical information to a range of audiences, including specialists and laypeople.

Professional Development: Evaluators assess the extent to which the student demonstrated independent work, project management skills, application of their disciplinary knowledge, and growth over the course of their academic career through capstone work. Maturation of skills such as critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and leadership are examined.

The department may elect to incorporate rubric criteria targeted towards program student learning outcomes, such as multimedia/design skills, teamwork abilities, or ethics/social responsibility. Industry professionals are often recruited to serve as external evaluators and provide valuable workplace perspective.

At Texas A&M, each capstone project is assessed by a committee composed of at minimum the student’s primary faculty advisor as well as one additional faculty member from within the department and in some cases external reviewers. Committee members thoroughly review all documentation and observe presentations to holistically score projects according to the grading rubric. Scores are discussed and a consensus final evaluation is determined.

Students must achieve a passing grade on their capstone, typically a B or higher, to fulfill degree requirements. Those that fall short of expectations are provided detailed feedback and may be asked to improve substandard elements or in rare cases repeat the project. Successful capstones are archived in department and university libraries as examples of exemplary work. The rigorous evaluation process helps ensure Texas A&M capstones cultivate graduates that are workplace and research ready.

Capstone projects at Texas A&M University are evaluated through a comprehensive, multi-dimensional rubric approach by expert faculty committees to grade scope, design, analysis, outcomes, communication skills and professional development. This thorough assessment model validates capstones as a true culminating experience demonstrating each student’s mastery of their chosen field before graduation.