Tag Archives: there


There were a few notable challenges my team and I faced during this project.

The first was securing buy-in across various stakeholder groups. As you can imagine, a project of this scope touched on nearly every department within the organization. We needed participation, collaboration, and compromise from people who didn’t initially see the value of this investment or understand how it would impact their day-to-day work. Gaining support took patience, empathy, and more than a few long meetings to discuss priorities, trade-offs, and potential benefits.

Another hurdle was managing expectations as requirements and timelines inevitably shifted. When working with new technologies, integrating complex systems, and coordinating among large teams, things rarely go exactly as planned. We had to balance the need for transparency when issues arose with preventing delays from spiraling out of control. Over-promising risked damaging credibility, but too many missed deadlines threatened support. Communications was key, as was accountability in putting fixes in place.

Data migration presented unique problems as well. Extracting, transforming, and transferring huge volumes of information from legacy databases while minimizing disruption to operations was a massive technical and logistical feat. We discovered numerous cases of corrupt, incomplete, or incorrectly structured records that required extensive preprocessing work. The amount of testing and retesting before “flipping the switch” on the new system was immense. Even with contingency plans, unplanned maintenance windows and bug fixes post-launch were to be expected.

Organizing and leading a distributed team across different regions and time zones also posed its own coordination difficulties. While cloud collaboration tools helped facilitate communication and project management, the lack of in-person interaction meant certain discussions were harder and delays more likely. Keeping everyone on the same page as tasks were handed off between locations took extra effort. Cultural differences in working styles and communication norms had to be understood and accommodated for productivity and morale.

Ensuring the reliability, performance, and cybersecurity of cloud services and infrastructure exceeded our expectations and industry standards was of paramount importance. We had stringent standards to meet, and anything less than perfect at go-live carried risks of a major credibility blow. Extensive load testing under real-world usage scenarios, third-party security audits, regular penetration testing, and simulated disaster recovery scenarios were all required. Even with diligent preparation, we knew post-launch support would need to be very robust.

Change management across boundaries, expectation management, successful data migration at scale, distributed team alignment, and guaranteed platform quality assurance were the primary challenges we had to solve iteratively throughout the project. It required meticulous planning, communication, testing, and the full commitment of every team member to get through each hurdle and progress towards our goals. With the right approaches and continued diligence, I believe we were able to overcome significant barriers and deliver value to the business in a secure, scalable way.


While social media use among youth has also been associated with some negative impacts such as increased risks of cyberbullying, social comparison and reducedsleep, researchers have also found many potential benefits of social media use for youth:

Social media allows youth to connect with peers and maintain existing friendships: One of the biggest benefits of social media is that it makes it easy for youth to stay connected with their friends even when they are physically separated. Various studies have found that social media helps strengthen both close friendships and larger online social networks of youth. It allows them to share updates about their daily lives, inside jokes, thoughts and feelings with their peer group. This ongoing social connectedness through social platforms is positively correlated with youth’s well-being and life satisfaction scores.

Social media expands social networks of youth: Beyond existing friends, social media platforms also give youth an opportunity to interact with a much larger network of peers who share their interests or are part of the same community through groups, pages and followings. This expanded social network exposes youth to a variety of perspectives and experiences which can help them learn social skills while connecting with like-minded individuals. For example, research shows that youth who are part of fandoms and interest-based communities on social media report higher self-esteem.

Social media boosts civic and political engagement of youth: Various studies have found positive links between social media use and youth’s civic and political engagement. For instance, researchers have found that youth who actively discuss social and political issues on social media are more likely to participate in online and offline political activities such as signing petitions, contacting representatives and even participating in protests or marches in the future. Social platforms give youth a chance to easily stay informed about issues in their community and voice support for causes they care about.

Social media supports identity exploration and development: Adolescence is a period when youth deeply explore and solidify their identities. Researchers have found that social media platforms allow youth to experiment with identities, explore their interests and reflect on ‘who they are’ through profiles, bios, pictures, opinions shared, groups joined and pages followed. This identity work benefits their psychosocial development. One study found that youth who engaged more in identity expression on social media had higher self-esteem and life satisfaction scores on average. Expression of authentic identities is important for youth well-being.

Social media enhances creativity of youth: Besides identity exploration, various researchers argue that active participation on social platforms significantly boosts youth’s creativity. For instance, youth produce user-generated content such as memes, digital artwork, videos, blogs, podcasts etc. that require creativity. Learning new digital skills to produce such content is positively associated with creative skills development and growth mindset in youth. Researchers also find that youth who share their creative works on social media report confidence in their abilities and interests in creative pursuits. Creativity fosters several emotional and intellectual benefits in youth.

Social media makes learning more engaging and collaborative: Education experts also argue that when used properly under guidance, social media enhances engagement, collaboration and motivation in formal learning among youth. For instance, classroom pages and groups on Facebook or projects involving media production encourage co-creation and peer learning. Hashtag challenges are positively linked to improved topic understanding. Online discussions allow shy students to participate more. Such collaborative learning experienced on social media carry over to classrooms and support youth development of 21st century skills such as critical thinking, communication and digital literacy.

Though social media use also comes with risks that should not be understated, research evidence increasingly highlights the significant benefits it provides youth in terms of social connectedness, identity exploration, information access, civic participation, creativity and collaborative learning when used judiciously under guidance. These positive effects aid crucial areas of youth development like well-being, self-esteem, communication abilities and future success. Sensible social media habits from a young age can set youth on a path of reaping maximum benefits while minimizing risks from such platforms.


Any large-scale data collection effort is bound to encounter some unexpected challenges and difficulties. While researchers planned thoroughly and aimed to anticipate obstacles, the complex real-world dynamics of collecting information from thousands of diverse human participants introduces uncertainties that are hard to foresee completely.

In this project, our team of 30 researchers worked diligently for over six months to comprehensively survey 10,000 individuals across the United States. We developed robust protocols and tested our methods via small pilot studies, but inevitably still faced surprises as we scaled our efforts nationwide. Some challenges came from the inherent messiness of interacting with so many people, while others reflected broader societal trends that subtly influenced responses.

A major hurdle stemmed from achieving adequate survey completion rates. Despite offering monetary incentives and reminders, we found it difficult to motivate some to fully answer our lengthy 100-question survey. This was compounded by technical difficulties like spotty internet access in certain rural areas preventing survey launches. We had to implement additional follow-up phone calls to improve response rates, which required extra time and costs. We only received completed surveys from 65% of our targeted participant pool, much lower than our optimistic 90% projection.

Reaching intended demographic groups across diverse regions proved tough. Our participant sample leaned somewhat older, whiter, and more affluent than the general U.S. population profile we sought. Certain populations proved remarkably difficult to recruit in enough numbers, like Hispanic, Black, and LGBTQ+ individuals. Even with culturally competent outreach strategies, recruitment was an uphill battle in some minority communities distrustful of outsider data requests due to historical exploitation. Our final dataset underrepresented certain perspectives.

Another dilemma came from unforeseen world events influencing participant mindsets and responses during the multi-month survey period. For example, a mass shooting occurred midway, after which answers to questions involving gun control shifted noticeably more liberal. Similarly, political tensions rose substantially as elections neared, and we witnessed a stark increase in polarized or emotionally charged responses across many issue topics compared to initial pilot studies. Major crises emphasized the difficulty controlling for real-world contextual factors when running long-term social studies.

We faced incidental technological and logistical problems disrupting data integrity. Periodic bugs crashing our online survey platform resulted in some participants’ work being lost, hurting motivation to re-start lengthy submissions. Additionally, improper data formatting in a small fraction of returned surveys necessitated extensive cleaning to remedy formatting irregularities prior to analysis. Such issues were perhaps inevitable at our large scale but lowered overall data quality.

Evolving privacy and IRB standards also introduced compliance challenges mid-project. For instance, tighter regulations emerged regarding identification and outreach to potentially vulnerable populations like pregnant people and those under 18. Compliance demanded time-consuming protocol revisions that pushed back our original deadlines. International transfer regulations likewise impacted our ability to outsource transcription work and forced costlier domestic alternatives.

Looking back, while our pre-study planning anticipated many methodical issues, the fluid interactions of collecting social data proved messy in practice. No strategy can fully prepare researchers for unpredictable real-world societal dynamics, technical difficulties, and changing standards impacting such massive data collection initiatives involving thousands of diverse human participants. Though our team learned invaluable lessons that will strengthen future work, unexpected challenges highlighted both the difficulty and necessity for nimble, adaptive research designs capable of reacting to surprises while preserving high scientific integrity. The experience demonstrated that even with robust preparation, numerous complexities lie beyond researchers’ complete control when undertaking large-scale empirical study of human populations.


Proper module naming and structuring:

Module names should be descriptive yet concise to indicate its purpose at a glance. Avoid generic names like “Module1”.
Group related modules together in a logical folder structure for easy navigation. Common structures include grouping by functionality, data types, projects etc.
Each module should focus on performing a single well-defined task. Splitting large modules into smaller focused ones improves management.

Use consistent code formatting:

Adopt a consistent indentation and whitespace usage to improve readability. Maintain a blank line between sections for visual separation.
Follow a logical consistent order to define and call subroutines, functions and variables. Common orders are alphabetical, chronological or functional grouping.
Add comments liberally to explain the purpose, inputs, outputs, limitations of sections of code. Well commented code is easier for others to grasp.

Avoid direct workbook/worksheet dependencies:

Hardcoding worksheet or workbook references should be avoided as it reduces reusability of the module across workbooks.
Use variables to refer to worksheets, cells or ranges to make the module portable. Provide parameters or functions to initialize these variables.

Parameterize inputs and outputs:

Define and pass required and optional parameters to subroutines/functions rather than using hardcoded values within them. This improves reusability and testing.
Return values using parameters passed by reference rather than directly modifying sheet cells or ranges from within the module.
Provide parameter validation and error handling for incorrect or missing parameters.

Implement error handling:

Anticipate potential errors and add On Error statements with descriptive error messages. Use error codes rather than generic “error” messages.
Handle common runtime errors gracefully rather than halting code execution. Log errors and continue processing where possible.
For non-critical background macros, enable error handling and resume next rather than stopping processing on errors.

Encapsulate logic in reusable functions:

Identify blocks of repeated logic and extract them out into well-named reusable functions with related parameters.
Functions should perform one logically related task and return a value rather than modifying sheets.
Functions make code modular, readable and easier to debug, modify and test in isolation.

Use constants and naming:

Declare constants for fixed values used in multiple places like column numbers, error codes etc to avoid hardcoding them repeatedly. Self-documenting names are used.
Give variables, cells and ranges meaningful names describing purpose/content rather than generic names like myVar, CellA1 etc. Use camelCase, underscores or PascalCase as per conventions.

Follow best practices for VBA coding:

Implement standard OOP principles like encapsulation, loose coupling, inheritance where relevant for object-oriented modules.
Add relevant help documentation for public interfaces using syntax like “VB_Header” and “VB_Help”. Inbuilt IntelliSense can then surface this.
For shared use, digitally sign and compile modules as add-ins for distribution. Provide uninstallation support.
Consider using optional structures for configuration that can be initialized based on workbook/user specific needs.
Follow standard code formatting, commenting and design principles as per industry best practices.

Implement testing:

Gradually build a comprehensive testing suite to validate functionality, catch regressions as code evolves.
parameterize tests using constants or shared variables for flexible maintenance.
Automate execution of full test suite on regular basis as part of continuous integration/deployment workflow.
Test boundary conditions, exceptional cases, performance in addition to regular validation scenarios.

Document the API/user guide:

Along with code comments, provide an overall technical documentation for module listing purpose, prerequisites, public interfaces, examples, limitations, frequently asked questions.
Consider online documentation or help files in add-in for end users in addition to in-code comments targeted for other developers.

Adopting these best practices while structuring Excel VBA modules helps create well-designed, organized, readable and maintainable code base which is more resilient to changes, easier to understand, extend and reuse in future. Proper planning and modularization pays off especially for large, complex and mission-critical deployments involving a team.