Tag Archives: were

WHAT WERE THE SPECIFIC NUTRITION EDUCATION AND PARENTING SKILLS TAUGHT DURING THE INTERVENTION

Leave a reply

The intervention aimed to help families adopt healthy eating and physical activity habits through 16 core sessions conducted over 6-9 months. The sessions were led by registered dietitians and covered topics such as:

Nutrition fundamentals: The basics of healthy eating were discussed based on the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s MyPlate guidelines. Families learned about proper portion sizes, reading food labels, understanding calories and nutrients, making smart substitutions, and planning meals/snacks around the major food groups. Emphasis was placed on choosing whole, minimally processed foods.

Meal planning: Skills were taught for budget-friendly weekly meal planning that incorporates more fruits/veggies, lean proteins, whole grains and dairy. Families practiced weekly meal planning as a group activity.

Progressive goal setting: Families set small, graduated goals to work on between sessions, such as adding a fruit or vegetable to one meal per day or incorporating 30 minutes of activity 3 times per week. Goals focused on behavior changes rather than weight or appearance to reduce pressure.

Behavior modification techniques: Cognitive restructuring, stimulus control, problem solving, contingency management/reinforcement, and relapse prevention strategies were discussed. Families learned how habits form and practical techniques to modify eating/activity behaviors.

Parenting skills: Parents learned responsive feeding techniques based on child hunger/fullness cues instead of pressuring children to eat. Strategies included child involvement in shopping/preparation, modeling of behaviors, positive reinforcement of eating fruits/veggies or playing outside. Authoritative discipline techniques emphasizing healthy limits and choices were discussed.

Portion sizes: Interactive exercises using plates, boxes and photos taught accurate portion sizes for grains, proteins and especially energy-dense/added sugar foods. Portion distortion was addressed.

Dining out: Skills to make healthier choices when eating away from home at restaurants, fast food or social events were covered. Modifying common recipes, asking for sauces/dressings on the side and budget-friendly restaurant swaps were discussed.

Physical activity: Following evidenced-based recommendations, families learned about the health benefits of reducing small screen time activities like TV/video games and replacing them with fun interactive games and sports anytime activities. Walking programs were started.

Stress and emotional eating: Stress management techniques like deep breathing, journaling and relaxation were taught. Coping strategies other than eating were discussed to manage emotions. The difference between physical and emotional hunger was highlighted.

Support systems and community resources: Strategies empowered families to utilize social support systems through pairing with other participant families. Food access and physical activity resources in their community were identified to encourage long-term sustainability.

Weekly grocery store tours: Led by a registered dietitian, families experienced grocery stores together to locate lower calorie options and healthier alternatives to frequent buys. Sales flyers were evaluated through a nutrition lens.

Cooking demonstrations: Professionally-led cooking classes introduced families to quick, low-cost and delicious recipes meeting intervention guidelines. Tastings encouraged trying new fruits/veggies/seasonings.

Goal setting review: Progress towards individualized behavior change goals set in early sessions were evaluated at each class through group discussion. Additional strategies to address barriers provided individualized troubleshooting. Supportive accountability to work towards lifestyle changes as a family unit was cultivated.

The multi-component intervention focused on intensive behavior modification through nutrition education, parenting skills and hands-on activities to equip families with sustainable skills and community resources to adopt healthier lifestyles long-term. Evaluation showed this comprehensive approach was significantly more effective at producing behavior changes and weight outcomes compared to standard recommendations alone.

WHAT WERE SOME OF THE CHALLENGES FACED DURING THE SYSTEM ROLLOUT AND HOW WERE THEY ADDRESSED?

Leave a reply

Any large-scale system rollout involves significant planning and preparation to ensure a smooth transition, but challenges are inevitable given the complexity of major technology deployments across a large organization. During our recent ERP system rollout, we encountered several challenges that required adaptive solutions to remedy during implementation.

The first major challenge was user training and adoption. Transitioning 10,000 employees worldwide to an entirely new system is a massive undertaking, and it was difficult to ensure all users felt sufficiently prepared to use the new system from day one in their daily workflows. To address this, we implemented a multi-pronged training approach. First, we rolled out self-paced online training modules covering the core features in the two months leading up to go-live. Next, we held in-person classroom training sessions at each major office location in the final month to allow for hands-on practice and Q&A with trainers. We designated “super users” at each office who completed advanced training to support colleagues during the first few weeks.

While training helped set users up for success, unexpected issues inevitably arose once the new ERP system went live globally. One such challenge was a higher than anticipated call volume to the central IT help desk for user login and navigation problems. To quickly resolve this, we implemented a temporary distributed help desk model. For the first two weeks post go-live, the super users spent half their time roaming their offices to be on-hand for immediate assistance, rather than returning to regular duties. This localized support was crucial in reducing wait times for help and frustration among end users.

Data migration from multiple legacy systems also posed problems. We discovered inaccurate customer records had been migrated due to faulty mapping between the old and new systems. Resolving these took additional time spent validating and correcting records which risked delaying billing, payments and fulfillment. To remedy this, managers were given transparent data quality reports and empowered our customer service teams to prioritize fixing major errors while leaving minor discrepancies to be addressed later.

Perhaps the biggest rollout challenge came from integrating the new ERP system with dozens of other business applications through custom APIs and interfaces. During testing and validation, our IT engineers uncovered stability issues, latency problems and occasional data mismatches between systems. To systematically address this, we established a ongoing integration task force with representation from each major team. They met weekly to prioritize and resolve interface issues based on business impact. They developed automated testing scripts to continuously monitor integrations for regressions moving forward.

Additional hiccups included slower than expected performance on mobile devices which impacted our field sales and service workers, as well as customized workflows not porting over correctly to the new system in some departments like manufacturing. In both cases, we assembled cross-functional process redesign teams to re-architect mobile apps and tailored workflows from the ground up to better align with the capabilities of the new platform.

While no major deployment will unfold without issues, taking a collaborative, transparent and adaptive approach helped us steadily resolve challenges as they arose. Six months since go-live, the system has now been smoothly adopted by our entire global workforce. By learning from early stumbles, we’ve established best practices and governance structures that will benefit future platform migrations and upgrades. The effort improved our technology landscape for years to come despite initial rollout speedbumps.

Thorough preparation, empowered local support teams, ongoing optimization through multidisciplinary task forces, and flexibility to redesign around platform limitations were key to addressing the diverse challenges faced during our large ERP system rollout. Continuous issue identification and prioritized resolutions kept stakeholder impact minimal as we navigated this massive technology transition.

WHAT WERE THE KEY FINDINGS FROM THE FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS

Leave a reply

A failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) is a systematic process for evaluating potential failure modes within a system or design and assessing the relative impact of those failures. By conducting a thorough FMEA, engineers can gain valuable insights into ways the system may fail and assess how to minimize risk and the effects of any potential failures that do occur. Some key findings that could emerge from a comprehensive FMEA may include:

The FMEA would carefully examine each component, subsystem and interface within the overall system or design. Engineers would evaluate potential ways that each part could fail to perform its intended function, considering factors such as material defects, wear and tear, excessive stresses, improper assembly, incorrect operational parameters, etc. Through this process, certain components may be identified as having higher failure potential due to their complexity, number of failure modes, operating stresses or other risk factors. For example, some parts that interface with users or are exposed to harsh environmental conditions could emerge as particular risk areas based on potential failure modes.

Upon determining all potential failure modes, the team would then assess the impact or severity of each failure on system performance, safety and other critical attributes. Some failure modes, even if relatively unlikely, may carry catastrophic or critical consequences like injury, system damage or inability to complete a primary function. Other failures may only cause minor quality issues or inconveniences. This severity analysis helps identify where design or process changes could help minimize overall risk. Certain component failures or failure combinations ranked with high severity may warrant immediate design focus or additional controls.

An important consideration would be the likelihood or probability of each specific failure mode occurring. Factors like history of similar parts, design maturity, manufacturing processes and component stresses are evaluated. Failures seen as very likely due to high risks require special attention versus others seen as only remotely possible. Combining severity and occurrence evaluations into an overall risk priority number, the FMEA can objectively pinpoint the highest priority issues to address proactively through design or process improvements.

Patterns may emerge implicating certain suppliers, manufacturing steps, environmental conditions or other root causes as contributing factors in multiple failure modes. For example, if many failures can be traced to variations in a critical material property, material certification and testing processes may need review. Such systematic insights help prioritize the most valuable corrective and preventive actions to take.

Recommended actions are formulated to reduce occurrence and/or minimize impact of the highest risk failures. These may include design changes like adding features to reinforce weaknesses, improve inspection points, or adding redundancies. Process recommendations could involve tightening controls, adding process validation checks, supplying staff training and so on. An effective FMEA drives continuous improvement by prioritizing actions supported by objective analysis.

Once improvements are made, the FMEA should be recalculated or revisited periodically over the system’s life cycle to verify effectiveness and consider additional learning from field data. New potential failure modes may emerge as designs or usage profiles evolve too. Periodic review ensures the analysis stays aligned with current conditions.

A robust FMEA process involves cross-functional perspectives in the analysis and uses its findings to help develop comprehensive reliability test plans as well as maintenance and inspection protocols. The end goal is achieving an optimal balance of high reliability, safety and cost-effectiveness throughout the system’s lifecycle. When consistently applied and maintained, FMEA can significantly reduce development and operational risks.

A thorough failure modes and effects analysis provides a rigorous, evidence-based process for identifying and prioritizing reliability and safety concerns within a system or design. Its key findings light the path for targeted improvements to minimize overall risks and their impacts on performance, schedule and budgets. Used effectively, FMEA drives powerful gains that resonate throughout the development, production and field support phases of any product or operation.