Author Archives: Evelina Rosser

HOW CAN TRANSPORTATION AGENCIES EFFECTIVELY COORDINATE WITH URBAN PLANNING TO ACCOMMODATE THE INTEGRATION OF CAVS

Leave a reply

Transportation agencies and urban planners will need to work closely together to ensure infrastructure and land use policies are adapted for the introduction of CAVs on public roads. Some of the key areas of coordination will include transportation network design, infrastructure upgrades, curb space management, parking requirements, and data sharing.

When it comes to transportation network design, agencies will need to consider how CAVs may impact traffic flow and congestion. As CAVs become more common, some lanes on roads may need to be redesigned for exclusive use by autonomous vehicles to optimize traffic flow. This could involve designating certain lanes for shared or priority use by CAVs, buses and high-occupancy vehicles. Planners will also need to model how changes to road and intersection design can take advantage of the improved safety and traffic management capabilities of connected vehicles. For example, reducing standard lane widths to add turning lanes or extend sidewalks.

In terms of infrastructure upgrades, transportation agencies will have to work closely with cities to prioritize upgrades to road signaling, lane markings and signs to support basic vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communication. This will allow CAVs to safely navigate intersections and adapt their speed based on real-time traffic conditions transmitted from infrastructure like traffic lights. Agencies will need to map out a plan for incrementally upgrading critical transportation corridors first based on traffic volume and congestion levels. Investments may also be needed in weather sensors along roadways to transmit data on precipitation or visibility to CAVs.

When it comes to curb space and parking requirements, cities will need to re-examine guidelines for on- and off-street parking, loading and pick-up/drop-off zones. With the advent of shared, autonomous and electric vehicles, demand for private parking is expected to decline over time. Curb space will still be needed for pickup/drop-off of people and deliveries. Cities may convert some spaces to quick-loading zones or dedicate certain curbs to autonomous shuttles and transportation network vehicles. Minimum parking requirements for new developments may also need to be reduced accordingly. This will require parking studies as well as coordination between transportation, planning and public works departments.

To effectively plan for CAV integration, transportation agencies also need access to relevant real-time city and vehicle data. This includes traffic volumes, congestion hotspots, vehicular trip origins/destinations and curb space activities. At the same time, cities need data from transportation agencies and CAV operators on fleet sizes, routing plans, dropping-off/picking up zones. Formal data sharing agreements and committees involving public agencies, private firms and research institutions can help establish protocols for sharing pertinent transportation data to support pilot programs and long-term CAV deployment strategies.

On the planning and policy side, transportation agencies and urban planners must ensure CAV integration supports broader community goals like sustainability, equity and livability. Tools like general plans, specific area plans and design guidelines will need amendments promoting transit-oriented development around shared CAV hubs. This could encourage a shift towards more compact, walkable development patterns less dependent on private vehicles. Planning departments may also develop strategies to deploy shared CAV services in an equitable manner. For example, ensuring underserved communities are prioritized for first-mile last-mile connection to fixed transit routes.

A cooperative and comprehensive approach between transportation agencies and urban planners is essential to responsibly guide the transition to an era of connectivity and automation. Regular collaboration through committees, public working groups and joint studies can help synchronize policies, coordinate multi-agency projects and ensure transportation infrastructure adapts to maximize the societal benefits of CAVs while mitigating any negative externalities. Continuous cooperation between stakeholders from government, academia and industry will also be important for future scenario assessment and deployment of other advanced technologies like drones and hyperloop systems in an integrated manner alongside CAVs. With proactive coordination, transportation agencies and cities can help ensure connected and autonomous vehicles are deployed strategically to create safer, more sustainable and accessible communities for all.

Transportation agencies must work closely with urban planners on issues ranging from road designs and infrastructure upgrades to parking reform and data sharing procedures. A collaborative governance framework recognizes CAVs both impact and are impacted by the larger built environment. Coordinated efforts can leverage coming autonomous technology to positively shape patterns of where and how we develop land along with how people and goods move throughout cities. By aligning CAV integration with broader city goals, transportation planners and agencies can facilitate well-planned deployment supporting livability, equity and sustainability.

CAN YOU PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON HOW TO CONDUCT A PAIN ASSESSMENT STUDY ON A MEDICAL SURGICAL UNIT

Leave a reply

The goal of conducting a pain assessment study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the unit’s current pain assessment and management practices. This will help identify opportunities to better meet patients’ needs and improve outcomes. When planning such a study, here are the key steps to follow:

First, define the objectives of the study clearly. The overarching goal would be to evaluate current pain assessment and management practices and identify areas for improvement. More specific objectives may include assessing the frequency and thoroughness of pain assessments, timeliness of analgesia administration, adequacy of pain control, documentation of pain evaluations, and patient satisfaction with pain management.

Second, design the study methodology. This pain assessment study would utilize a retrospective medical record review as well as a prospective patient interview component. For the medical record review, a sample of patient records from the past 6 months would need to be selected randomly. Criteria for inclusion may be adult patients who were hospitalized for 3 or more days and had documented pain. Data to abstract from the records would include demographic details, nursing documentation of pain assessments, PRN analgesia administration records, patient reported pain scores over time, and discharge summaries.

For the prospective component, a convenience sample of current patients expected to stay 3 or more days who report pain would be asked to participate. After obtaining informed consent, these patients would be interviewed using a standardized questionnaire to assess their perceptions and satisfaction with the unit’s pain management approach. It would also be valuable to interview nurses and physicians to understand current practices from their perspective.

Third, develop the appropriate data collection tools needed for the study. For the medical record review, an abstraction form would need to be created to systematically extract the required data points from each selected record in a uniform manner. The patient and staff interview questionnaires would also need to be developed, with mostly closed-ended questions to facilitate quantification and analysis of responses. All tools must be pre-tested on a small sample to ensure they can reliably collect the intended data.

Fourth, obtain the necessary approvals from the hospital’s Institutional Review Board to conduct the study involving human subjects. The study protocol, purpose, methodology, potential risks/benefits, privacy and data security measures would need to be reviewed and approved. Recruitment materials like flyers and consent forms for patients and staff would also require IRB approval.

Fifth, implement the study by recruiting participants and collecting the data as planned. This would involve screening medical records randomly based on the selection criteria, identifying eligible patients on the unit, explaining the study and obtaining consent, conducting interviews at patients’ bedsides while minimizing disruption, and extracting data from medical records using the abstraction tool. Frontline nurses and physicians providing direct care would also need to be recruited to participate in brief interviews during non-busy times.

Sixth, analyze the collected data through quantitative and qualitative methods as applicable. Descriptive and inferential statistics would be used to analyze extracted medical record data and summarize responses from the structured interview questionnaires. Qualitative thematic analysis of open-text interview responses may reveal further insights. Bringing both medical record review findings and interview perceptions together would provide a robust understanding of current practices and opportunities.

Seventh, develop recommendations based on the study results. Areas identified through data analysis as significantly impacting quality of pain assessment and management would be prioritized. Targeted strategies to address gaps, such as additional staff education, clinical workflow changes, use of pain assessment tools, enhancing interdisciplinary communication, and engaging patients as partners could be suggested. Implementation of recommendations would then need to be planned and evaluated for effectiveness over time through periodic re-auditing.

Disseminating the results would help spread learning to others within the hospital and field. Opportunities such as presenting at conferences, publishing in journals, sharing at grand rounds, developing educational resources, and implementing system changes organization-wide based on findings could optimize outcomes for many more patients dealing with pain. Conducting a robust pain assessment study using mixed methods as outlined here can provide valuable insights to advance care.

Carefully planning the objectives, methodology, tool development, approvals, implementation, analysis, recommendations, and dissemination is crucial for a comprehensive study to evaluate current pain practices and identify strategies to better support patients experiencing pain. Following this approach would generate reliable, meaningful evidence to guide enhancements with the goal of improving quality and outcomes for those in need of effective pain relief.

CAN YOU EXPLAIN MORE ABOUT THE PROOF OF WORK CONSENSUS MECHANISM USED IN BLOCKCHAIN

Leave a reply

Proof-of-work is the decentralized consensus mechanism that underpins public blockchain networks like Bitcoin and Ethereum. It allows for all participants in the network to agree on the validity of transactions and maintain an immutable record of those transactions without relying on a centralized authority.

The core idea behind proof-of-work is that participants in the network, called miners, must expend computing power to find a solution to a complex cryptographic puzzle. This puzzle requires miners to vary a piece of data called a “nonce” until the cryptographic hash of the block header results in a value lower than the current network difficulty target. Finding this proof-of-work requires a massive amount of computing power and attempts. Only when a miner finds a valid solution can they propose the next block to be added to the blockchain and claim the block reward.

By requiring miners to expend resources (electricity and specialized computer hardware) to participate in consensus, proof-of-work achieves several important properties. First, it prevents Sybil attacks where a single malicious actor could take over the network by creating multiple fake nodes. Obtaining a 51% hashrate on a proof-of-work blockchain requires an enormous amount of specialized mining equipment, making these attacks prohibitively expensive.

Second, it provides a decentralized and random mechanism for selecting which miner gets to propose the next block. Whoever finds the proof-of-work first gets to build the next block and claim rewards. This randomness helps ensure no single entity can control block production. Third, it allows nodes in the network to easily verify the proof-of-work without needing to do the complex calculation themselves. Verifying a block only requires checking the hash is below the target.

The amount of computing power needed to find a proof-of-work and add a new block to the blockchain translates directly to security for the network. As more mining power (known as hashrate) is directed at a blockchain, it becomes exponentially more difficult and expensive to conduct a 51% attack. Both the Bitcoin and Ethereum networks now have more computing power directed at them than most supercomputers, providing immense security through their accumulated proof-of-work.

For a blockchain following the proof-of-work mechanism, the rate at which new blocks can be added is limited by the difficulty adjustment algorithm. This algorithm aims to keep the average block generation time around a target value (e.g. 10 minutes for Bitcoin) by adjusting the difficulty up or down based on the hashrate present on the network. If too much new mining power joins and blocks are being found too quickly, the difficulty will increase to slow block times back to the target rate.

Likewise, if older mining hardware is removed from the network causing block times to slow, the difficulty is decreased to regain the target block time. This dynamic difficulty adjustment helps a proof-of-work blockchain maintain decentralized consensus even as exponential amounts of computing power are directed towards mining over time. It ensures the block generation rate remains stable despite massive changes in overall hashrate.

While proof-of-work secures blockchains through resource expenditure, it is also criticized for its massive energy consumption as the total hashrate dedicated to chains like Bitcoin and Ethereum continues to grow. Estimates suggest the Bitcoin network alone now consumes around 91 terawatt-hours of electricity per year, more than some medium-sized countries. This environmental impact has led researchers and other blockchain communities to explore alternative consensus mechanisms that aim to achieve security without high computational resource usage like proof-of-stake.

Nonetheless, proof-of-work has remained the primary choice for securing public blockchains since it was introduced in the original Bitcoin whitepaper. Over a decade since Bitcoin’s inception, no blockchain at scale has been proven secure without either proof-of-work or a hybrid consensus model. The combinations of randomness, difficulty adjustment, and resource expenditure provide an effective, if energy-intensive, method for distributed ledgers to reach consensus in an open and decentralized manner without a centralized operator. For many, the trade-offs in security and decentralization are worthwhile given present technological limitations.

Proof-of-work leverages economic incentives and massive resource expenditure to randomly select miners to propose and verify new blocks in a public blockchain. By requiring miners to find solutions to complex cryptographic puzzles, it provides crucial security properties for open networks like resistance to Sybil attacks and a random/decentralized consensus mechanism. This comes at the cost of high energy usage, but no superior alternative has been proven at scale yet for public, permissionless blockchains. For its groundbreaking introduction of a working decentralized consensus algorithm, proof-of-work remains the preeminent choice today despite improvements being explored.

WHAT ARE SOME POTENTIAL CHALLENGES THAT STUDENTS MIGHT FACE WHEN IMPLEMENTING CAPSTONE PROJECTS IN THE OR

Leave a reply

One of the major challenges students may encounter is coordinating their capstone project with surgical schedules and procedures. Operating rooms have very tight schedules to maximize efficiency and see as many patients as possible. Surgical teams are focused on providing care to patients and do not have extra time available. Students would need to work closely with surgeons, administrators, and schedulers to find opportunities to observe procedures and gather needed data or materials for their projects without disrupting clinical care. Additional scheduling challenges could occur if a student’s project requires observing multiple similar procedures over time to track outcomes or collect enough samples for quantitative analysis. Organizing many return trips to the operating room may be difficult to coordinate with surgeons’ schedules.

Related to scheduling challenges is the issue of surgical delays. Any delays or unexpected extensions to a surgical case could impact a student’s ability to complete what they need to for their capstone project during that planned procedure. Operating rooms need to keep to schedule to avoid downstream delays and maintain throughput of patients. Students would have to understand that their projects cannot be allowed to cause delays, even minor ones, and may need alternate plans depending on how cases proceed. Having redundancy planned or an understanding that scheduling multiple observation opportunities may be needed is important. Communication with teams about expectations around delays is important to address this challenge.

Another key challenge involves ensuring projects do not compromise sterility or disrupt the flow of the surgical environment. Operating rooms have strict protocols around maintaining sterility and established workflows that everyone in the OR must follow. A student’s project data collection, equipment needs, or activities could potentially breach sterility or disrupt the work if not carefully planned. Students may find it difficult to gather some types of data or materials without impacting the sterile field. Capstone projects would need to be designed carefully with input from clinical experts to identify what can be reasonably collected or implemented given sterility and workflow constraints. Students would also need education on OR sterile technique and policies to conduct themselves appropriately.

A further complication could arise from the need to obtain informed consent from surgical patients or providers to be involved in students’ research projects. Patients rightly expect their care to be handled by licensed clinical experts, not trainees. Ensuring patient safety and comfort, obtaining valid consent, and avoiding any perception that projects might influence medical decision making are important complex challenges. Capacity constraints may also impact how many patients can reasonably be recruited within a student’s timeline. Navigating ethical approval processes and addressing concerns about added workload or liability for clinical teams could prove difficult. Strong faculty oversight may be needed to address human subjects challenges.

Medical equipment availability could pose another hurdle. Operating rooms are equipped for surgery, not necessarily student projects. If projects require specialized equipment, instrumentation, or technologies beyond standard OR setups, obtaining access and ensuring proper training for use may be an obstacle. Equipment may need to be procured, sterilized, and stored appropriately which takes extra resources. Storage space is also limited, and equipment cannot interfere with the sterile field. Finding ways to incorporate student project needs within existing OR constraints and resources requires creative planning.

Students themselves may have steep learning curves when it comes to the clinical environment, timescale expectations, and navigating healthcare systems. Students are not familiar with the realities of fast-paced clinical practice and may underestimate the level of coordination and collaboration required with busy surgical teams. Academic timelines may not align well with realities of project recruitment, data collection periods, or dissemination expectations in healthcare. Learning hospital procedures like OR access, patient privacy and consent rules, IRB processes, and interacting with staff, administrators and providers takes time and support. Ensuring realistic scope, strong guidance, feedback and troubleshooting help for students is important to address challenges of the healthcare climate they are less familiar with.

There are meaningful logistical, ethical, and systems-based challenges students may encounter when taking capstone work into the operating room. With meticulous planning, oversight, clear contingencies, additional guidance as needed and flexibility on all sides, many of these barriers can be navigated. Early coordination and understanding of OR constraints is key. With the right preparation and support structure, surgical environments could provide rich opportunities for valuable translational student work despite inherent complexities.

WHAT WERE SOME OF THE CHALLENGES FACED DURING THE DEVELOPMENT AND LAUNCH OF THE VOLUNTEER LINK APP

Leave a reply

One of the biggest challenges faced during the development of the Volunteer Link app was ensuring the app was designed and built to be accessible, intuitive, and easy to use for all potential volunteer users. The app needed to appeal to and be easily navigated by volunteers of all ages, technical ability levels, and backgrounds. Getting the user experience and user interface right required extensive user testing during the development process to identify and address any usability issues. Small tweaks to things like button placement, menu structures, onboarding flows, and onboarding tutorials could make a huge difference in whether volunteers found the app engaging and valuable or confusing and difficult to use.

Another major challenge was developing the backend infrastructure and connecting all the necessary databases and APIs for the core functions of the app to work properly. The app needed to pull volunteer opportunities from various nonprofit databases, maintain user profiles and volunteer history records, communicate with nonprofit systems to accept and track volunteer registrations, and more. Developing stable and secure connections between all these different systems posed technical difficulties. There was a risk of bugs, glitches, or downtime if the architecture and database structures were not planned and built carefully. Extensive testing was required to ensure everything worked seamlessly behind the scenes.

On a similar note, security and privacy were big concerns that required a lot of focus during development. Things like user authentication, payment systems (if donations were involved), personally identifiable volunteer data, and nonprofit organizational data all needed robust protection. Hackers may have tried to access or exploit volunteer or nonprofit information stored on the backend systems. The development team had to implement strong security measures, data encryption, access controls, and ongoing security monitoring to keep users’ information and the overall app infrastructure safe from threats. Even a single security breach could severely damage trust in the Volunteer Link brand and service.

User acquisition and retention were also major challenges, especially for the initial launch phase. Getting the word out about the new app and encouraging both volunteers and nonprofits to download it and start actively using the platform required a well-thought-out and well-funded marketing strategy. Traditional outreach methods like press releases, emails, social media, and events needed coordinating. The app also likely required compelling value propositions and engagement features to encourage volunteers to keep the app installed and continue returning to find new opportunities. Without critical mass adoption on both sides, the network effects would not kick in to truly make the app useful for matching volunteers to opportunities.

Developing partnerships with major nonprofits in the local community to list opportunities on the app from day one was important for launch success. But convincing large, established nonprofits accustomed to their usual methods to try a new volunteer matching tech solution posed its own challenges. The Volunteer Link team had to demonstrate clear benefits the app provided over existing methods and address any concerns nonprofits had about switching to a digital system. Pilot testing with select nonprofit partners beforehand could have helped gain those initial organizational adoptions.

There was also the challenge of long-term sustainability. Like most startups, revenue models, ongoing business development strategies, and plans for product growth/expansion would need vetting. Questions around monetization strategies like potential premium services, advertising, nonprofit fees, and maintaining competitiveness in the market had to be addressed from the start to ensure long term viability. Launching an MVP to prove traction, then raising venture capital money were likely critical milestones. Raising sizable funding rounds presents fundraising challenges of its own for startup projects.

Ever-changing technology could pose risks. Things like shifting mobile design trends, new Volunteerism tech competitors entering the space, platform changes from companies like Apple or Google, and more meant the Volunteer Link technology and business model may need regular re-evaluations and improvements post-launch. Staying on top of industry shifts required dedicated planning, monitoring, and resources for continuous product upgrades and innovations over time. Failures to modernize could threaten relevance and market share down the road.

Developing an impactful new volunteer matching mobile app like Volunteer Link faced substantial challenges across many dimensions – from user experience design, to technical infrastructure build out, to nonprofit partnerships, marketing execution, revenue models, long term growth, and adaptability to market changes. Thoroughly addressing each challenge area required extensive cross-functional coordination across product, engineering, partnerships, operations, marketing and other teams from initial planning through ongoing evolution. Strong project management skills were essential to navigate these complicated development and launch phases successfully.