Tag Archives: data

WERE THERE ANY UNEXPECTED CHALLENGES OR DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED DURING THE DATA COLLECTION PROCESS

Leave a reply

Any large-scale data collection effort is bound to encounter some unexpected challenges and difficulties. While researchers planned thoroughly and aimed to anticipate obstacles, the complex real-world dynamics of collecting information from thousands of diverse human participants introduces uncertainties that are hard to foresee completely.

In this project, our team of 30 researchers worked diligently for over six months to comprehensively survey 10,000 individuals across the United States. We developed robust protocols and tested our methods via small pilot studies, but inevitably still faced surprises as we scaled our efforts nationwide. Some challenges came from the inherent messiness of interacting with so many people, while others reflected broader societal trends that subtly influenced responses.

A major hurdle stemmed from achieving adequate survey completion rates. Despite offering monetary incentives and reminders, we found it difficult to motivate some to fully answer our lengthy 100-question survey. This was compounded by technical difficulties like spotty internet access in certain rural areas preventing survey launches. We had to implement additional follow-up phone calls to improve response rates, which required extra time and costs. We only received completed surveys from 65% of our targeted participant pool, much lower than our optimistic 90% projection.

Reaching intended demographic groups across diverse regions proved tough. Our participant sample leaned somewhat older, whiter, and more affluent than the general U.S. population profile we sought. Certain populations proved remarkably difficult to recruit in enough numbers, like Hispanic, Black, and LGBTQ+ individuals. Even with culturally competent outreach strategies, recruitment was an uphill battle in some minority communities distrustful of outsider data requests due to historical exploitation. Our final dataset underrepresented certain perspectives.

Another dilemma came from unforeseen world events influencing participant mindsets and responses during the multi-month survey period. For example, a mass shooting occurred midway, after which answers to questions involving gun control shifted noticeably more liberal. Similarly, political tensions rose substantially as elections neared, and we witnessed a stark increase in polarized or emotionally charged responses across many issue topics compared to initial pilot studies. Major crises emphasized the difficulty controlling for real-world contextual factors when running long-term social studies.

We faced incidental technological and logistical problems disrupting data integrity. Periodic bugs crashing our online survey platform resulted in some participants’ work being lost, hurting motivation to re-start lengthy submissions. Additionally, improper data formatting in a small fraction of returned surveys necessitated extensive cleaning to remedy formatting irregularities prior to analysis. Such issues were perhaps inevitable at our large scale but lowered overall data quality.

Evolving privacy and IRB standards also introduced compliance challenges mid-project. For instance, tighter regulations emerged regarding identification and outreach to potentially vulnerable populations like pregnant people and those under 18. Compliance demanded time-consuming protocol revisions that pushed back our original deadlines. International transfer regulations likewise impacted our ability to outsource transcription work and forced costlier domestic alternatives.

Looking back, while our pre-study planning anticipated many methodical issues, the fluid interactions of collecting social data proved messy in practice. No strategy can fully prepare researchers for unpredictable real-world societal dynamics, technical difficulties, and changing standards impacting such massive data collection initiatives involving thousands of diverse human participants. Though our team learned invaluable lessons that will strengthen future work, unexpected challenges highlighted both the difficulty and necessity for nimble, adaptive research designs capable of reacting to surprises while preserving high scientific integrity. The experience demonstrated that even with robust preparation, numerous complexities lie beyond researchers’ complete control when undertaking large-scale empirical study of human populations.

WHAT ARE SOME POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS TO THE CHALLENGES OF DATA PRIVACY AND ALGORITHMIC BIAS IN AI EDUCATION SYSTEMS

Leave a reply

There are several potential solutions that aim to address data privacy and algorithmic bias challenges in AI education systems. Addressing these issues will be crucial for developing trustworthy and fair AI tools for education.

One solution is to develop technical safeguards and privacy-enhancing techniques in data collection and model training. When student data is collected, it should be anonymized or aggregated as much as possible to prevent re-identification. Sensitive attributes like gender, race, ethnicity, religion, disability status, and other personal details should be avoided or minimal during data collection unless absolutely necessary for the educational purpose. Additional privacy techniques like differential privacy can be used to add mathematical noise to data in a way that privacy is protected but overall patterns and insights are still preserved for model training.

AI models should also be trained on diverse, representative datasets that include examples from different races, ethnicities, gender identities, religions, cultures, socioeconomic backgrounds, and geographies. Without proper representation, there is a risk algorithms may learn patterns of bias that exist in an imbalanced training data and cause unfair outcomes that systematically disadvantage already marginalized groups. Techniques like data augmentation can be used to synthetically expand under-represented groups in training data. Model training should also involve objective reviews by diverse teams of experts to identify and address potential harms or unintended biases before deployment.

Once AI education systems are deployed, ongoing monitoring and impact assessments are important to test for biases or discriminatory behaviors. Systems should allow students, parents and teachers to easily report any issues or unfair experiences. Companies should commit to transparency by regularly publishing impact assessments and algorithmic audits. Where biases or unfair impacts are found, steps must be taken to fix the issues, retrain models, and prevent recurrences. Students and communities must be involved in oversight and accountability efforts.

Using AI to augment and personalize learning also comes with risks if not done carefully. Student data and profiles could potentially be used to unfairly limit opportunities or track students in problematic ways. To address this, companies must establish clear policies on data and profile usage with meaningful consent mechanisms. Students and families should have access and control over their own data, including rights to access, correct and delete information. Profiling should aim to expand opportunities for students rather than constrain them based on inherent attributes or past data.

Education systems must also be designed to be explainable and avoid over-reliance on complex algorithms. While personalization and predictive capabilities offer benefits, systems will need transparency into how and why decisions are made. There is a risk of unfair or detrimental “black box” decision making if rationales cannot be understood or challenged. Alternative models with more interpretable structures like decision trees could potentially address some transparency issues compared to deep neural networks. Human judgment and oversight will still be necessary, especially for high-stakes outcomes.

Additional policies at the institutional and governmental level may also help address privacy and fairness challenges. Laws and regulations could establish data privacy and anti-discrimination standards for education technologies. Independent oversight bodies may monitor industry adherence and investigate potential issues. Certification programs that involve algorithmic audits and impact assessments could help build public trust. Public-private partnerships focused on fairness through research and best practice development can advance solutions. A multi-pronged, community-centered approach involving technical safeguards, oversight, transparency, control and alternative models seems necessary to develop ethical and just AI education tools.

With care and oversight, AI does offer potential to improve personalized learning for students. Addressing challenges of privacy, bias and fairness from the outset will be key to developing AI education systems that expand access and opportunity in an equitable manner, rather than exacerbate existing inequities. Strong safeguards, oversight and community involvement seem crucial to maximize benefits and minimize harms of applying modern data-driven technologies to such an important domain as education.

HOW CAN I CREATE A PIVOTTABLE IN EXCEL FOR DATA ANALYSIS

Leave a reply

To create a pivot table in Excel, you first need to have your raw dataset organized in an Excel worksheet with headers in the first row identifying each column. The data should have consistent field names that you can use to categorize and group the data. Make sure any fields you want to analyze or filter on are in their own columns.

Once your dataset is organized, select any cell within the dataset. Go to the Insert tab at the top of the Excel window and click PivotTable. This will launch the Create PivotTable window. You can either select a New Worksheet option to place the pivot table on its own sheet or select an Existing Worksheet and select where you want to place the pivot table.

For this example, select New Worksheet and click OK. This will open a new sheet with your pivot table fields pane displayed on the right side. By default, it will add all the fields from your source data range to the Rows, Columns, Values areas at the top.

Now you can customize the pivot table by dragging and dropping fields between areas. For example, if your data was sales transactions and you wanted to analyze total sales by product category and year, you would drag the “Product Category” field to the Rows area and the “Year” field to the Columns area. Then drag the “Sales Amount” field to the Values area.

This will cross tabulate all the product categories as row headings across the column years showing the total sales amount for each category/year combination. The pivot table is dynamically linked to the source data, so any changes to the source will be automatically reflected in the pivot table.

You can rearrange and sort the fields in each area by clicking the dropdowns that appear when you hover over a field. For example, you may want to sort the row categories alphabetically. You can also add fields to multiple areas like Rows and Columns for a more complex analysis.

To filter the data in the pivot table, click anywhere inside the table body. Go to the PivotTable Tools Options tab that appears above and click the Filter drop down box below any field name in the report filter pane. Here you can select specific items to include or exclude from the analysis.

For example, you may want to only include sales from 2018-2020 by category to analyze recent trends. Pivoting and filtering allows you to quickly analyze your data from different perspectives without having to rewrite formulas or create additional tables.

You can also customize the pivot table’s layout, style, subtotals, and field settings using additional options on the Design and Layout tabs of the PivotTable Tools ribbon. Common additional features include sorting data in the table, conditional formatting, calculated fields/items, grouping dates, and pivot charts.

All of these actions allow you to extract more meaningful insights from your raw data in an interactive way. Once your pivot table is formatted how you want, you can refresh it by going to the Analyze tab and clicking Refresh anytime the source data is updated. Pivot tables are a very powerful tool for simplifying data analysis and discovery in Excel.

Some additional tips for effective pivot tables include:

Give the pivot table source data its own dedicated worksheet tab for easy reference later on.

Use clear, consistent field names that indicate what type of data each column contains.

Consider additional calculated fields for metrics like averages, percentages, and trends over time.

Filter to only show the most meaningful or relevant parts of the analysis at a time for better focus.

Add descriptive Report Filters to let users dynamically choose subsets of data interactively.

Combine multiple pivot tables on a dashboard worksheettab to compare analyses side by side.

Link pivot charts to visualizetrends and relationships not obvious from the table alone.

Save pivot table reports as their own snapshot files to share findings with stakeholders.

With well structured source data and thoughtful design of the pivot table layout, filters and fields, you can gain powerful insights from your organization’s information that would be very difficult to uncover otherwise. Pivot tables allow you to dramatically simplify analysis and reporting from your Excel data.

HOW CAN STUDENTS SECURE DATA ACCESS AND INTERPRETABILITY FROM INDUSTRY PARTNERS FOR THEIR CAPSTONE PROJECTS

Leave a reply

Securing the necessary data access and ensuring adequate interpretability of data from industry partners for student capstone projects requires careful planning, communication, and establishing clear agreements between the academic institution and company. There are several key steps students should take to give themselves the best chance of a successful project:

The first step is to clearly define the goals and objectives of the capstone project and outline the specific types of data that will be needed to effectively achieve those goals. Students need to be able to convey to industry partners exactly what data insights and analyses are required so the right data can be identified and shared. Generic or vague data requests are less likely to be approved.

Once initial project scoping is complete, students then need to contact potential industry partners to discuss partnership opportunities. When reaching out, emphasize how the project aligns with the company’s strategies, problems they are trying to solve, and how insights could benefit their business. Being able to demonstrate ROI for the partner is important. Request an introductory meeting to present the project proposal and have an open dialogue.

If an industry partner is interested, students should guide discussions towards drafting a formal data sharing agreement. Key terms to address in the agreement include: what specific data elements will be shared, in what format, for what time period, and any relevant restrictions on the geographic locations, customers, or other attributes represented in the data. The agreement must also outline clear expectations regarding data security, confidentiality protocols, intellectual property considerations, and how resulting analyses and insights can be shared or published.

Obtaining approval from both the academic institution and industry partner for the formal agreement is a critical step before any data exchange occurs. Having all expectations and restrictions documented up front prevents misunderstandings later on. Data use limitations should be carefully considered to ensure the project goals can still be realistically achieved. Alternative approaches may need to be brainstormed if certain data cannot be shared due to compliance or privacy issues.

With an agreement in place, the next step involves actually accessing and obtaining the raw data from the partner. Data should ideally be anonymized or de-identified as much as possible to address privacy and prevent any inference of personally identifiable information. Students still need assurances the relevant variables and attributes available in the raw data will allow for appropriate analyses and insights relevant to answering the research questions.

It is good practice for students to meet with industry partner data experts to obtain a thorough overview and documentation of the data dictionaries, variables, value codes, relevant data quality issues, and interpret what each field represents. Asking questions ensures a solid understanding of what each data point means, where it came from, and any caveats in how it should or shouldn’t be interpreted.

Once the data is accessed, periodic check-ins with industry partners are important throughout the analytical process. Sharing early findings, proposed methodologies, or if any new types of derived data are created allows the partner to confirm everything remains within the scope of the agreed upon terms. Any proposed publications, reports or presentations involving partner data should be reviewed by them in advance for feedback or required redactions before being published more widely.

Upon project completion, students should provide a full debrief to the partner highlighting the insights gained, conclusions drawn, and how the work potentially adds value. Requesting a testimonial acknowledging their contributions and thanking them for supporting academic research helps foster ongoing relationships. Maintaining open lines of communication and focusing on mutual benefit will help students secure the necessary data access and interpretability from industry collaborators for successful capstone experiences.

Having clearly defined goals, formalizing agreements, ensuring data documentation and understanding restrictions, maintaining communication, and ultimately providing value back to partners are key aspects for students to navigate when collaborating with businesses on applied research projects requiring access to proprietary data. Taking the time up front to smoothly facilitate these processes increases the chances of positive outcomes.

HOW DID YOU ENSURE THE SECURITY OF THE STUDENT DATA IN THE SIS CAPSTONE PROJECT

Leave a reply

We understood the importance of properly securing sensitive student data in the SIS project. Data security was prioritized from the initial planning and design phases of the project. Several measures were implemented to help protect student information and ensure compliance with relevant data privacy regulations.

First, a thorough data security assessment was conducted to identify and address any vulnerabilities. This involved analyzing the entire software development lifecycle and identifying key risks at each stage – from data collection and storage to transmission and access. The OWASP Top 10 security risks were also referenced to help uncover common issues.

Second, we carefully designed the system architecture with security in mind. The database was isolated on its own private subnet behind a firewall, and not directly accessible from external networks. Communication with backend services occurred only over encrypted channels. Application code was developed following secure coding best practices to prevent vulnerabilities. Authentication and authorization mechanisms restricted all access to authorized users and specific systems only.

Third, during implementation strong identity and access management controls were put in place. Multi-factor authentication was enforced for any account with access to sensitive data. Comprehensive password policies and account lockout rules were applied. Granular role-based access control (RBAC) models restricted what actions users could perform based on their organization role and need-to-know basis. Detailed auditing of all user activities was configured for security monitoring purposes.

Fourth, we implemented robust data protection mechanisms. All student data stored in the database and transmitted over networks was encrypted using strong industry-standard algorithms like AES-256. Cryptographic keys and secrets were properly secured outside of the codebase. Backup and disaster recovery procedures incorporated data encryption capabilities. When designing APIs and interfaces, input validation and output encoding was performed to prevent data tampering and vulnerabilities.

Fifth, the principle of least privilege was followed assiduously. Systems, services and accounts were configured with minimal permissions required to perform their specific function. Application functions were segregated based on their access levels to student information. Unused or unnecessary services were disabled or removed from systems altogether. Operating system weak points were hardened through configuration of services, file permissions, and host-based firewall rules.

Sixth, ongoing security monitoring and logging facilities were established. A web application firewall was deployed to monitor and block malicious traffic and attacks. Extensive logging of user and system activities was enabled to generate audit trails. Monitoring dashboards and alerts notified on any anomalous behavior or policy violations detected through heuristics and machine learning techniques. Vulnerability assessments were conducted regularly by independent assessors to identify new weaknesses.

Seventh, a comprehensive information security policy and awareness program were implemented. Data privacy and protection guidelines along with acceptable usage policies were drafted and all team members had to acknowledge compliance. Regular security training ensured the staff were aware of their roles and responsibilities. An incident response plan prepared the organization to quickly detect, contain and remediate security breaches. Business continuity plans helped maintain operations and safeguard student records even during disaster situations.

We conducted privacy impact assessments and third party audits by legal and compliance experts to ensure all technical and process controls met statutory and regulatory compliance requirements including GDPR, FERPA and PCI standards. Any non-compliances or gaps identified were urgently remediated. The system and organization were certified to be compliant with the stringent security protocols required to safely manage sensitive student information.

The exhaustive security measures implemented through a defense-in-depth approach successfully secured student data in the SIS from both external and internal threats. A culture of security best practices was ingrained in development and operations. Comprehensive policies and controls continue to effectively protect student privacy and maintain the project’s compliance with data protection mandates.