Tag Archives: during

WHAT ARE SOME COMMON CHALLENGES FACED DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF DEEP LEARNING CAPSTONE PROJECTS

One of the biggest challenges is obtaining a large amount of high-quality labeled data for training deep learning models. Deep learning algorithms require vast amounts of data, often in the range of millions or billions of samples, in order to learn meaningful patterns and generalize well to new examples. Collecting and labeling large datasets can be an extremely time-consuming and expensive process, sometimes requiring human experts and annotators. The quality and completeness of the data labels is also important. Noise or ambiguity in the labels can negatively impact a model’s performance.

Securing adequate computing resources for training complex deep learning models can pose difficulties. Training large state-of-the-art models from scratch requires high-performance GPUs or GPU clusters to achieve reasonable training times. This level of hardware can be costly, and may not always be accessible to students or those without industry backing. Alternatives like cloud-based GPU instances or smaller models/datasets have to be considered. Organizing and managing distributed training across multiple machines also introduces technical challenges.

Choosing the right deep learning architecture and techniques for the given problem/domain is not always straightforward. There are many different model types (CNNs, RNNs, Transformers etc.), optimization algorithms, regularization methods and hyperparameters to experiment with. Picking the most suitable approach requires a thorough understanding of the problem as well as deep learning best practices. Significant trial-and-error may be needed during development. Transfer learning from pretrained models helps but requires domain expertise.

Overfitting, where models perform very well on the training data but fail to generalize, is a common issue due to limited data. Regularization methods and techniques like dropout, batch normalization, early stopping, data augmentation must be carefully applied and tuned. Detecting and addressing overfitting risks requiring analysis of validation/test metrics vs training metrics over multiple experiments.

Evaluating and interpreting deep learning models can be non-trivial, especially for complex tasks. Traditional machine learning metrics like accuracy may not fully capture performance. Domain-specific evaluation protocols have to be followed. Understanding feature representations and decision boundaries learned by the models helps debugging but is challenging. Bias and fairness issues also require attention depending on the application domain.

Integrating deep learning models into applications and production environments involves additional non-technical challenges. Aspects like model deployment, data/security integration, ensuring responsiveness under load, continuous monitoring, documentation and versioning, assisting non-technical users require soft skills and a software engineering mindset on top of ML expertise. Agreeing on success criteria with stakeholders and reporting results is another task.

Documentation of the entire project from data collection to model architecture to training process to evaluation takes meticulous effort. This not only helps future work but is essential in capstone reports/theses to gain appropriate credit. A clear articulation of limitations, assumptions, future work is needed along with code/result reproducibility. Adhering to research standards of ethical AI and data privacy principles is also important.

While deep learning libraries and frameworks help development, they require proficiency which takes time to gain. Troubleshooting platform/library specific bugs introduces delays. Software engineering best practices around modularity, testing, configuration management become critical as projects grow in scope and complexity. Adhering to strict schedules in academic capstones with the above technical challenges can be stressful. Deep learning projects involve an interdisciplinary skillset beyond conventional disciplines.

Deep learning capstone projects, while providing valuable hands-on experience, can pose significant challenges in areas like data acquisition and labeling, computing resource requirements, model architecture selection, overfitting avoidance, performance evaluation, productionizing models, software engineering practices, documentation and communication of results while following research standards and schedules. Careful planning, experimentation, and holistic consideration of non-technical aspects is needed to successfully complete such ambitious deep learning projects.

WHAT ARE SOME COMMON CHALLENGES THAT MSBTE STUDENTS FACE DURING THE CAPSTONE PROJECT PLANNING AND EXECUTION

One of the major challenges that MSBTE students face during capstone project planning is unclear project definition and scope. When students are first given the task of developing their capstone project, many struggle to properly define the goals, objectives, activities, timeline and expected outcomes of the project. Without a clear project definition and scope established upfront, it becomes difficult for students to plan tasks, assign responsibilities and stay on track throughout execution. This leads to scope creep where additional requirements are continually added as the project progresses.

Related to project definition is choosing an appropriate project topic or idea. Many students find it challenging to select a topic that is innovative yet feasible to complete within the given timeframe and constraints of the capstone project. An overambitious idea may be impossible to fully realize while topics that are too narrow or simple do not allow students to demonstrate their skills. Selecting the right balance of innovative yet doable takes experience that many students lack, causing initial topic ideas to fail or require major revisions.

Once the scope and topic are established, a common struggle is creating realistic project plans and schedules. It can be difficult for students, especially those working on their first major project, to accurately estimate task durations, dependencies and identify all activities required to complete each project phase from planning to execution to closing. Without a solid project plan in place, it becomes nearly impossible for student teams to track progress, allocate resources properly and complete the capstone on schedule. Delays in one task can have domino effects on subsequent work.

Another major planning challenge is assembling an effective project team. Capstone projects involve collaboration between students from different disciplines and specializations. Some find it difficult to find skilled teammates with complimentary talents required for the project. Conflicts also commonly arise around roles, responsibilities and work allocation within teams. Without establishing clear expectations, guidelines and team processes upfront, inter-team dynamics become strained which negatively impacts productivity and quality of work.

During project execution, a persistent challenge is managing scope changes and requirement additions once the project is already underway. Inevitably during implementation, issues arise or improvements are identified that were not anticipated during the planning stages. Making adjustments to the project baseline mid-stream requires careful change management to avoid deviations from the original objective or timeline delays. Students lack experience navigating scope changes while keeping projects on track.

Resource and budget management poses difficulties as well. Students have limitations on funding, materials, tools, facilities access and more compared to real-world projects. Any budget overruns, resource constraints or alternatives required due to cost must be proactively planned for rather than reacted to, which poses a learning challenge. Time management is also a struggle as student teams juggle academics, extracurriculars and personal lives in addition to their capstone commitments.

Lack of experience with process methodologies presents challenges. Capstone projects are intended to mirror industry practices, yet students have limited exposure to project management frameworks, quality control protocols, configuration management, documentation standards, testing procedures and more. Following structured processes helps large endeavors succeed but requires students to self-learn many new skills and best practices on top of the technical work of the project itself.

Planning realistic scopes and schedules, team dynamics, change management, limited resources, time pressures, and inexperience with professional processes all contribute to difficulties MSBTE students commonly face in their capstone projects. With mentorship guidance and lessons learned through overcoming obstacles, capstone projects offer invaluable learning opportunities for students to develop the portfolio of competencies required to thrive in project-based careers.

WHAT WERE SOME OF THE CHALLENGES YOU FACED DURING THE CAPSTONE PERIOD AND HOW DID YOU OVERCOME THEM

One of the biggest challenges I faced during my capstone period was effectively defining the problem I wanted to address through my project. Coming up with a well-defined, actionable problem statement is so important as it lays the foundation for the entire project. In the initial stages, I had a vague idea of an area I was interested in but had not narrowed it down to a specific problem. This led to a lot of wasted time researching too broadly without focus.

To overcome this, I took several brainstorming sessions to thoroughly map out all the problems, pain points and opportunities within my area of interest. I created mind maps, wrote out user stories and even conducted some informal interviews with potential stakeholders to gain better insights. This helped crystallize the problem I wanted to tackle. I then developed an initial problem statement which I refined further after discussing it with my capstone advisor. Defining the problem clearly early on allowed me to properly scope and plan the rest of my project.

Another major challenge I encountered was related to project execution – specifically keeping track of the enormous amount of moving parts as the project progressed and keeping myself accountable to deadlines. As the scope and complexity of the capstone project was much larger than anything I had undertaken before, it was easy to lose sight of the overall timeline and dependencies between tasks.

To manage this complexity, I created detailed project plans using Microsoft Project. I broke down the project into individual work streams, tasks and sub-tasks with clear owners, start and end dates. I also identified task dependencies, established regular check-ins with my advisor and set reminders in my calendar to ensure I was continuously monitoring progress against the plan. This project management approach helped me gain visibility and control over the various streams of work. It also ensured I could proactively course correct if any tasks slipped.

Gathering quality insights and feedback from stakeholders was another significant challenge area for me. Given the nature of my project which involved developing a new product, capturing informed, unbiased input from potential users was critical but difficult to achieve. People are often less inclined to engage in feedback exercises for student projects.

To address this, I adopted a multifaceted stakeholder engagement strategy. This included leveraging my personal and professional networks to find an initial set of stakeholders who were interested to provide input. I also conducted guerilla user research by visiting locations where my target users frequented to survey people on the spot. Social listening on online forums related to my topic helped gain additional perspectives. By piecing together insights from different qualitative and quantitative methods, I was able to gather rich stakeholder feedback to inform my solution development.

Towards the later stages, integrating all the individual pieces of work done over the capstone period into a polished final deliverable also emerged as a major hurdle. Pulling everything together coherently required tying up many loose ends as well as ensuring consistency across various components.

To manage this integration effectively, I established a central project folder with clearly defined subfolders for each work stream – research, design, development etc. I created templates for documents, presentations and reports to maintain uniformity. I also allowed buffer time in my schedule for testing and refining the final deliverable based on feedback. This comprehensive organizational approach along with peer reviews helped me pull all elements together into a high quality, well-rounded capstone package.

The capstone project period posed several challenges related to problem definition, complex project execution, stakeholder engagement and final integration. With methods like thorough brainstorming, detailed project planning, multifaceted research and centralized organization – I believe I was able to adequately overcome these hurdles and deliver a meaningful solution through an iterative learning process. The capstone experience has certainly helped strengthen my ability to plan, manage and execute large scale projects independently.

CAN YOU PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE MENTORSHIP AND PEER FEEDBACK DURING THE CAPSTONE PROCESS

The capstone project is intended to be a culmination of the skills and knowledge gained throughout the Nanodegree program. It provides students an opportunity to demonstrate their proficiency and ability to independently develop and complete a project from concept to deployment using the tools and techniques learned.

To help guide students through this ambitious independent project, Udacity provides both mentorship support and a structured peer feedback system. Mentors are industry professionals who review student work and provide guidance to help ensure projects meet specifications and stay on track. Students also rely on feedback from their peers to improve their work before final submission.

Each student is assigned a dedicated capstone mentor from Udacity’s pool of experienced mentors at the start of the capstone. Mentors have deep expertise in the relevant technical field and have additionally received training from Udacity on providing constructive guidance and feedback. The role of the mentor is to review interim project work and hold check-in meetings to discuss challenges, evaluate progress, and offer targeted advice for improvement.

Mentors provide guidance on the design, implementation, and deployment of the project from the initial proposal, through standups and work-in-progress reviews. Students submit portions of their work—such as architecture diagrams, code samples, and prototypes—on a regular basis for mentor review. The mentor evaluates the work based on the program rubrics and provides written and verbal commentary. They look for demonstration of key skills and knowledge, adherence to best practices, and trajectory toward successful completion. Their goal is to steer students toward high-quality results through constructive criticism and suggestions.

For complex projects spanning several months, mentors typically scheduleindividual video conferences with each student every 1-2 weeks. These meetings allow for a more comprehensive check-in than written feedback alone. Students can then demonstrate live prototypes, discuss technical difficulties, and receive live coaching from their mentors. Meeting frequency may increase as project deadlines approach to ensure students stay on track. Mentors are also available via email or chat outside of formal meetings to answer any questions that come up.

In addition to mentor support, students provide peer feedback to their fellow classmates throughout the capstone. After each work-in-progress submission, students anonymously review two of their peers’ projects. They evaluate based on the same rubrics as the mentors and leave thoughtful written comments on project strengths and potential areas for improvement. Students integrate this outside perspective into further iterations of their work.

Peer feedback ensures diverse opinions beyond just the assigned mentor. It also allows students to practice evaluating projects themselves and learn from reviewing others’ work. Students have found peer feedback to be extremely valuable—seeing projects from an outside student perspective often surfaces new ideas. The feedback is also meant to be shaped as constructive suggestions rather than personal criticism.

Prior to final submission, students go through an internal “peer review” where they swap projects and conduct a deep code review with another classmate. This acts as a final checkpoint before projects are polished and submitted to the mentors for evaluation. Students find bugs, pinpoint potential improvements, and get another set of eyes to ensure their work is production-ready before the evaluation process begins.

The structured mentoring and peer review procedures employed during Nanodegree capstones are essential for guiding students through substantial self-directed projects. They allow for regular project monitoring, issues to surface early, and work to iteratively improve according to feedback. With support from both mentors and peers, students can confidently develop advanced skills and demonstrate their learning through a polished final portfolio project. The combination of human expertise and community input helps maximize the outcome of each student’s capstone experience.

WHAT RESOURCES AND SUPPORT ARE AVAILABLE TO STUDENTS DURING THEIR CAPSTONE PROJECTS AT RED DEER COLLEGE

Red Deer College understands that the capstone project can be one of the most challenging but rewarding experiences for students as they near the completion of their program. To help ensure students have every opportunity to succeed, RDC provides a wide variety of resources and support systems.

Perhaps the most important resource is guidance from capstone course instructors and faculty advisors. Students work closely one-on-one with their capstone instructor who provides direction, feedback, and answers questions throughout the project process. The instructor monitors progress, offers advice when issues arise, and ensures students stay on track to meet deliverables. Some programs also assign each student a faculty advisor from their discipline who serves as an additional mentor and contact for specialized input.

Instructors and advisors help connect students to other experts on campus who can lend specialized knowledge. For example, students undertaking research-based capstones can access support from RDC’s research office to learn about methodology, get approval for studies involving people or animals, and connect with subject librarians for help with literature reviews. Students tackling technical or design-focused projects have options to consult instructors from related applied departments for guidance incorporating appropriate standards, materials, or skills into their work.

Librarians are key resources for capstone research. RDC’s full-service academic library houses collections, databases, and interlibrary loan services to help students access the scholarly literature needed to design thorough, well-supported projects. Librarians offer instruction on navigating resources, constructing effective searches, and properly citing sources to avoid plagiarism. Subject librarians with deeper expertise in certain disciplines are available for one-on-one consultations tailored to each student’s capstone topic.

Peer support also plays an important role. Many programs facilitate informal mentorship between senior capstone students and those just starting the process. This allows for valuable exchange of tips, encouragement, and advice on challenges faced. The college also has a Student Success Centre that runs informational workshops on time management, effective writing, presentation skills, and overcoming ‘capstone anxiety’ to help boost confidence. Peers can further support one another through casual study groups for feedback on drafts or practice runs of presentations before the final defence.

Technological resources aid project execution and presentation. RDC provides computer labs, software applications, audio/visual equipment loans, and multimedia design facilities relevant to capstones across diverse subjects. Students gain access to tools like 3D printers, engineering design suites, recording studios, simulation programs, and statistical analysis platforms to build robust, multimodal projects. Technical staff are available for brief training and troubleshooting issues.

Funding opportunities exist to enhance capstone scholarship. Internal awards through the college offer limited financial support for budget items like research participant incentives, equipment rentals, conference travel relevant to disseminating findings, or other expenses that elevate projects beyond normal course requirements. External grants may also be pursued under faculty guidance. Overall, RDC aims to surround students with layered guidance, peer fellowship, research tools, and even modest funding to allow capstone visions to reach their fullest potential.

Red Deer College provides students an extensive network of instructor advising, subject matter experts, library services, peer mentorship programs, technical facilities, and scarce financial support to help navigate capstone experiences. This commitment of resources and personalized attention reflects RDC’s dedication to nurturing innovative, exemplary final projects that ready graduates both academically and practically for their post-degree plans in a chosen field or further studies. Students are well-equipped at the institution to independently conduct meaningful, sophisticated work for their capstone climaxes to undergraduate learning.